Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #32407 > unrolled thread
| Started by | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-06-12 17:09 -0400 |
| Last post | 2011-06-13 05:47 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 170 — 29 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-12 17:09 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-12 17:59 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-12 18:01 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 05:48 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 08:27 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 10:34 +0100
[Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 06:37 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-06-13 06:50 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 12:18 +0100
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 13:41 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:41 +0100
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 10:18 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 12:29 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-13 18:09 +0000
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 15:40 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 14:54 -0500
Re: [Troll] "chrisv" and liarmutt leg humping each other. one reach around away from a happy ending. "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 15:59 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:27 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-14 17:00 -0700
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 12:33 +0100
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:20 -0500
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 09:42 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 16:18 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 13:07 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 13:18 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 19:23 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 20:17 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 15:41 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-13 12:47 -0700
Re: Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 12:53 -0700
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 14:50 -0500
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 15:51 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 23:50 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 19:24 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-13 15:02 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 12:39 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:04 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:24 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:42 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:57 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 15:01 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 14:12 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:30 -0500
Re: Time To flush the stupid turd "chrisv".. Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 09:44 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 06:20 -0700
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 16:01 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 13:02 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 23:45 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 23:22 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 01:29 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 02:45 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-14 06:50 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:13 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 11:08 +0200
[Troll] Imbecility and dishonesty incarnate Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 06:31 -0400
Re: [Troll] Imbecility and dishonesty incarnate William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 11:50 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 07:23 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 09:18 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 17:03 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 13:26 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 13:11 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 20:43 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:20 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-14 20:45 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 03:31 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-14 21:45 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-06-15 05:57 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-15 07:31 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 10:57 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 06:14 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:16 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 06:09 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 07:34 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:24 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 09:45 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 10:47 -0400
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:54 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 10:11 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 11:15 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:23 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:02 +0200
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-14 18:06 +0100
Re: Time To flush useless turd "Hadron" down the toilet. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:11 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turd "Hadron" down the toilet. "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 13:16 -0400
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 20:29 +0200
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:14 +0200
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 13:21 -0400
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 20:10 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 15:54 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 04:30 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 10:27 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-14 16:12 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:09 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 00:12 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:05 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:01 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:14 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:23 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:26 -0500
Re: Time To flush the "chrisv" turd... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 13:38 -0400
Re: Time To flush the "chrisv" turd... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:48 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:19 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:34 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:53 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 20:14 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 12:33 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 17:13 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 11:59 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 20:33 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:37 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 00:04 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 18:11 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-16 00:12 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:32 -0700
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-16 09:07 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 10:27 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-16 11:21 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-16 17:54 +0200
[Troll] A dope with a rope Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-16 12:55 -0400
Re: [Chris Ahlstrom] A pussy with no balls "Barb Dwyer" <barb@invalid.com> - 2011-06-16 13:09 -0400
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-06-16 13:18 -0400
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 18:20 +0100
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-16 12:40 -0500
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope "Barb Dwyer" <barb@invalid.com> - 2011-06-16 14:02 -0400
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 19:56 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-16 14:30 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-17 07:26 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 01:33 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Bjørn Steensrud <bjornst+usenet@skogkatt.homelinux.org> - 2011-06-17 11:16 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 10:31 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-16 15:43 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-17 09:35 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 10:36 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-17 16:47 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 12:50 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-18 02:15 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-18 10:21 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-18 13:10 +0200
Time for some scripting! Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-18 06:59 -0400
Re: Time for some scripting! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-18 10:40 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:20 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 16:11 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:13 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 04:10 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 10:28 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 07:40 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Rick O'Shea" <rick@invalid.com> - 2011-06-15 09:22 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 15:29 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hardon <hardon.quirk@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 13:39 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 09:56 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 18:25 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-15 10:54 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 11:17 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-15 11:47 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:17 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:48 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 17:56 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:26 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:40 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 19:16 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:36 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:02 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:57 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:15 -0500
Re: Time To flush the useless asshole "chrisv"... Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 10:17 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:22 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turds like "chrisv"... Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 10:48 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 12:19 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:16 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 05:47 +0200
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 19:02 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. |
| Message-ID | <gcfwnccpml.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #32870 |
"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> writes: > "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> wrote in message > news:it7s9o$l7g$1@speranza.aioe.org... >> >> fscking asshole "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> news:9usev6tirnalpk1mem5mfbh6fc9tl25enr@4ax.com... >>> Ezekiel wrote: >>> >>>>By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will >>>>force a >>>>filesystem check periodically. >>> >>> Who claimed otherwise, fsckwit? >>> >>> Surely, you don't believe a claim by the shameless liar "Hadron"... >>> >> >> >> another fine "advocacy" post from the 100% userless piece of shit turd. >> >> "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit. >> > > The frothing turd really is a STUPID piece of shit. Seems that even basic > reading is too difficult for an idiot like him. > >>>>By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will >>>>force a filesystem check periodically. >>> >>> Who claimed otherwise, fsckwit? > > Hmmmm.... maybe it was *this* claim you stupid piece of shit. > > <quote> > ... fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will *ONLY* trigger an > actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. > </quote> > > It does not ONLY check if it's marked dirty because it will also check the > filesystem after N-many days have elapsed. > > Go back to grilling burgers turd - even the most basic reading and computer > concepts are too fscking difficult for idiots like you. Amazing isnt it? You would think even the turd would have learnt by now. What a catch : Turd, TomB, sMarti, Dumb Willy and co all in the same net. All wrong. And TomB claims to use Debian and he didnt KNOW THIS? Once more : Hadron 1 - 0 "Advocates" ROTFLM!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 18:06 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. |
| Message-ID | <eyMJp.3136$Ll1.1328@newsfe24.ams2> |
| In reply to | #32902 |
On 14/06/11 18:02, Hadron wrote: > "Ezekiel"<zeke@nosuchmail.com> writes: > >> "Feudo Maccari"<feudo@invalid.com> wrote in message >> news:it7s9o$l7g$1@speranza.aioe.org... >>> >>> fscking asshole "chrisv"<chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:9usev6tirnalpk1mem5mfbh6fc9tl25enr@4ax.com... >>>> Ezekiel wrote: >>>> >>>>> By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will >>>>> force a >>>>> filesystem check periodically. >>>> >>>> Who claimed otherwise, fsckwit? >>>> >>>> Surely, you don't believe a claim by the shameless liar "Hadron"... >>>> >>> >>> >>> another fine "advocacy" post from the 100% userless piece of shit turd. >>> >>> "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit. >>> >> >> The frothing turd really is a STUPID piece of shit. Seems that even basic >> reading is too difficult for an idiot like him. >> >>>>> By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will >>>>> force a filesystem check periodically. >>>> >>>> Who claimed otherwise, fsckwit? >> >> Hmmmm.... maybe it was *this* claim you stupid piece of shit. >> >> <quote> >> ... fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will *ONLY* trigger an >> actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. >> </quote> >> >> It does not ONLY check if it's marked dirty because it will also check the >> filesystem after N-many days have elapsed. >> >> Go back to grilling burgers turd - even the most basic reading and computer >> concepts are too fscking difficult for idiots like you. > > Amazing isnt it? You would think even the turd would have learnt by > now. What a catch : Turd, TomB, sMarti, Dumb Willy and co all in the > same net. All wrong. And TomB claims to use Debian and he didnt KNOW > THIS? > > Once more : Hadron 1 - 0 "Advocates" > > ROTFLM! Why do you resort to insults if what you say is right? For me the knowledge that I am in the right removes the need to try and insult people with childish remarks. -- Openbytes the Linux/FOSS Blogazine! - http://www.openbytes.tk "Cave quid dicis, quando, et cui." Catch me in #techrights on freenode.net BytesMedia: www.bytesmedia.co.uk Email: bytes4free@googlemail.com Skype: tim.openbytes Twitter: twitter.com/_goblin Identi.ca: identi.ca/openbytes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 12:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Time To flush useless turd "Hadron" down the toilet. |
| Message-ID | <cf5fv6h6koebqi38b2flh65edg4d1flsl7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #32905 |
> Hadron quacked: >> >> What a catch : Turd, TomB, sMarti, Dumb Willy and co all in the >> same net. All wrong. And TomB claims to use Debian and he didnt KNOW >> THIS? Stop lying, Larry. >> Once more : Hadron 1 - 0 "Advocates" If you are counting lies that are not fooling anyone with a brain... -- "nymshifting foul mouthed cretin chrisv" - Hadron Quark, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 13:16 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Time To flush useless turd "Hadron" down the toilet. |
| Message-ID | <it8519$cjj$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #32913 |
"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:cf5fv6h6koebqi38b2flh65edg4d1flsl7@4ax.com... >> Hadron quacked: >>> >>> What a catch : Turd, TomB, sMarti, Dumb Willy and co all in the >>> same net. All wrong. And TomB claims to use Debian and he didnt KNOW >>> THIS? > > Stop lying, Larry. > stop breathing you useless piece of shit. "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 20:29 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. |
| Message-ID | <20110614202656.693@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #32902 |
On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: > > Amazing isnt it? You would think even the turd would have learnt by > now. There's only one person in need of a lesson, and it isn't me. > What a catch : Turd, TomB, sMarti, Dumb Willy and co all in the > same net. All wrong. And TomB claims to use Debian and he didnt KNOW > THIS? What? That the periodic fs checks are configured in /etc/fstab? Again: they aren't. > Once more : Hadron 1 - 0 "Advocates" Yeah, sure. You're not even allowed on the field. > ROTFLM! -- http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be There's no place like 127.0.0.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 19:14 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. |
| Message-ID | <20110614190644.945@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #32870 |
On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Ezekiel: > > Hmmmm.... maybe it was *this* claim you stupid piece of shit. > ><quote> > ... fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will *ONLY* trigger an > actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. ></quote> > > It does not ONLY check if it's marked dirty because it will also > check the filesystem after N-many days have elapsed. WTF, does Hadron's dumbness rubs off or what? The above statement was in reference to the filesystem checks triggered by the settings in /etc/fstab, more specifically the fs_passno field. *Those* filesystem checks happen at *every* boot, but will only result in a full check on dirty filesystems. The *periodic* filesystem checks are a property of the filesystem itself, and are configured with the tune2fs command line tool, and not by /etc/fstab as Hadron thinks. It are two totally different and unrelated mechanisms. Now, for Hadron all hope is gone, but I'm sure you will take this opportunity to learn something. -- http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity. ~ Bullet Tooth Tony
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 13:21 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. |
| Message-ID | <it85ev$9mg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32918 |
TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Ezekiel: > > <snip> > > It are two totally different and unrelated mechanisms. Now, for Hadron > all hope is gone, but I'm sure you will take this opportunity to learn > something. I used to think that. -- A woman physician has made the statement that smoking is neither physically defective nor morally degrading, and that nicotine, even when indulged to in excess, is less harmful than excessive petting." -- Purdue Exponent, Jan 16, 1925
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 20:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. |
| Message-ID | <6aokc8-mb9.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #32918 |
In reply to TomB who posted: > On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Ezekiel: >> >> Hmmmm.... maybe it was *this* claim you stupid piece of shit. >> >><quote> >> ... fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will *ONLY* trigger an >> actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. >></quote> >> >> It does not ONLY check if it's marked dirty because it will also >> check the filesystem after N-many days have elapsed. > > WTF, does Hadron's dumbness rubs off or what? Yup, sure looks that way. They haven't got a clue. > The above statement was > in reference to the filesystem checks triggered by the settings in > /etc/fstab, more specifically the fs_passno field. *Those* filesystem > checks happen at *every* boot, but will only result in a full check on > dirty filesystems. > > The *periodic* filesystem checks are a property of the filesystem > itself, and are configured with the tune2fs command line tool, and not > by /etc/fstab as Hadron thinks. > > It are two totally different and unrelated mechanisms. Now, for Hadron > all hope is gone, but I'm sure you will take this opportunity to learn > something. Nah, the trolling f#ckwit has proved many times that he's too stupid to learn anything. -- XPN :: http://xpn.altervista.org "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 15:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <s99kc8-lrd.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #32865 |
In reply to chrisv who posted: > Ezekiel wrote: > >>By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will force a >>filesystem check periodically. > > Who claimed otherwise, fsckwit? It seems the trolling "Ezekiel" f#ckwit is as mentally challenged in reading & comprehension as his twin M$ zealot Hadron. Or is it a requirement of being a M$ wintroll. > Surely, you don't believe a claim by the shameless liar "Hadron"... Wouldn't surprise me. -- "!sgub evah t'nseod CP sihT ?sgub naem ayaddahW" "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 04:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <it95gf$kjo$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #32865 |
On 14-06-11 16:45, chrisv wrote: > Ezekiel wrote: > >> By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will force a >> filesystem check periodically. The root / system is checked every 30 mounts to be precise. Here is the manpage, which reveals that the interval can be changed: http://linux.die.net/man/8/tune2fs > Who claimed otherwise, fsckwit? Nobody. > Surely, you don't believe a claim by the shameless liar "Hadron"... Excuse me? they are one of a kind. Ezkill is no different from "Hadron". He's nothing but yet another potty mouthed, sneering, lying and insulting Anti-FOSS M$ Paid To Post $hill. Why don't you take any of your own advice and *KILLFILE THE POS* for crying out loud! -- |_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin, alias ML2MST |_|_|0| Registered GNU/Linux user 513040 |0|0|0| http://www.soundclick.com/martivanlin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 10:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ghamc8-qu8.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #33042 |
In reply to Marti Van Lin who posted: > On 14-06-11 16:45, chrisv wrote: > >> Ezekiel wrote: >> >>> By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will force a >>> filesystem check periodically. > > The root / system is checked every 30 mounts to be precise. > > Here is the manpage, which reveals that the interval can be changed: > > http://linux.die.net/man/8/tune2fs > >> Who claimed otherwise, fsckwit? > > Nobody. > >> Surely, you don't believe a claim by the shameless liar "Hadron"... > > Excuse me? they are one of a kind. Ezkill is no different from "Hadron". > He's nothing but yet another potty mouthed, sneering, lying and > insulting Anti-FOSS M$ Paid To Post $hill. They could be twins, they post the same garbage. > Why don't you take any of your own advice and *KILLFILE THE POS* for > crying out loud! +1 -- Windows Breakthrough: It finally booted on the first try. "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 16:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <it819v$juj$1@inf2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| In reply to | #32848 |
Am Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:24:04 -0400 schrieb Ezekiel: > By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will > force a filesystem check periodically. Actually the filesystem occurs after N boots OR N days, whatever happens first. At least the last time I checked.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 13:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <it84jc$6qp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32891 |
"Chris" <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:it819v$juj$1@inf2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de... > Am Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:24:04 -0400 schrieb Ezekiel: > >> By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will >> force a filesystem check periodically. > > Actually the filesystem occurs after N boots OR N days, whatever happens > first. > At least the last time I checked. Correct. It does *not* check the filesystem "only" when if the filesystem is marked dirty.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 00:12 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <it8mkj$1hi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32910 |
Ezekiel wrote: > > "Chris" <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> wrote in message > news:it819v$juj$1@inf2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de... >> Am Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:24:04 -0400 schrieb Ezekiel: >> >>> By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will >>> force a filesystem check periodically. >> >> Actually the filesystem occurs after N boots OR N days, whatever happens >> first. >> At least the last time I checked. > > Correct. It does *not* check the filesystem "only" when if the filesystem > is marked dirty. And, to top it off, you can set it to *only* check if FS is dirty And now?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-15 01:05 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20110615010432.332@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #32910 |
On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Ezekiel: > "Chris" <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> wrote in message > news:it819v$juj$1@inf2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de... >> Am Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:24:04 -0400 schrieb Ezekiel: >> >>> By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) >>> will force a filesystem check periodically. >> >> Actually the filesystem occurs after N boots OR N days, whatever >> happens first. At least the last time I checked. > > Correct. It does *not* check the filesystem "only" when if the > filesystem is marked dirty. Who said that? I know I didn't. -- http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be Mr. Torture brings pain To the housewives in Spain ~ Helloween
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 19:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s2k4cocpp3.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #32848 |
"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> writes: > "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:0q1uywvqam.fsf@news.eternal-september.org... >> Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> writes: >> >>> On 2011-06-14, Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>>>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >> >> Yes they can take ages. You are wrong. Why do you continue to make a >> fool of yourself by making silly claims that are easily disproven? >> >> >>>>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls the >>>>> order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will only >>>>> trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. >> >> What is your point exactly? You clearly dont understnd the issue and are >> making things up to big yourself up again. >> >> My POINT was that the check at sytem start can land you in the shit. >> >> AND you are WRONG. The defaults here are to check every N reboots. >> >> Your cluelessness seems to know no bounds. >> > > Wrong on another count as well. The other day I booted from my Ubuntu HDD > drive. The *default* configuration is such that I saw this message: > > /dev/xxx/yyy has gone <N> days without being checked, check forced. > > By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will force a > filesystem check periodically. I just noticed turd chrisv claiming I am lying... LOL! Once more sMarti ends up with egg on his face me-tooing known morons. I hope the "new Chris" corrects the idiots.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 13:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <it84t2$8pp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32899 |
"Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message news:s2k4cocpp3.fsf@news.eternal-september.org... > "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> writes: > >> "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:0q1uywvqam.fsf@news.eternal-september.org... >>> Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> writes: >>> >>>> On 2011-06-14, Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>>>>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >>> >>> Yes they can take ages. You are wrong. Why do you continue to make a >>> fool of yourself by making silly claims that are easily disproven? >>> >>> >>>>>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls the >>>>>> order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will >>>>>> only >>>>>> trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. >>> >>> What is your point exactly? You clearly dont understnd the issue and are >>> making things up to big yourself up again. >>> >>> My POINT was that the check at sytem start can land you in the shit. >>> >>> AND you are WRONG. The defaults here are to check every N reboots. >>> >>> Your cluelessness seems to know no bounds. >>> >> >> Wrong on another count as well. The other day I booted from my Ubuntu HDD >> drive. The *default* configuration is such that I saw this message: >> >> /dev/xxx/yyy has gone <N> days without being checked, check forced. >> >> By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will >> force a >> filesystem check periodically. > > I just noticed turd chrisv claiming I am lying... LOL! > Don't waste your time with that idiot. Once again he has absolutely nothing of value to add other than leg humping someone who is proven to be factually wrong. The useless turd is too busy frothing and screaming to even comprehend a simple sentence. <quote> ... fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will *ONLY* trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. </quote> > Once more sMarti ends up with egg on his face me-tooing known morons. > > I hope the "new Chris" corrects the idiots. I think he just did. Facts are facts. And the *fact* is that fsck does not run "only" if the filesystem is marked dirty. (you can configure it this way - but it is not the default and the claim is still wrong.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 19:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <4y614xr71.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #32916 |
"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> writes: > "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:s2k4cocpp3.fsf@news.eternal-september.org... >> "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> writes: >> >>> "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:0q1uywvqam.fsf@news.eternal-september.org... >>>> Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> On 2011-06-14, Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>>>>>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >>>> >>>> Yes they can take ages. You are wrong. Why do you continue to make a >>>> fool of yourself by making silly claims that are easily disproven? >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls the >>>>>>> order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will >>>>>>> only >>>>>>> trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. >>>> >>>> What is your point exactly? You clearly dont understnd the issue and are >>>> making things up to big yourself up again. >>>> >>>> My POINT was that the check at sytem start can land you in the shit. >>>> >>>> AND you are WRONG. The defaults here are to check every N reboots. >>>> >>>> Your cluelessness seems to know no bounds. >>>> >>> >>> Wrong on another count as well. The other day I booted from my Ubuntu HDD >>> drive. The *default* configuration is such that I saw this message: >>> >>> /dev/xxx/yyy has gone <N> days without being checked, check forced. >>> >>> By *default* Ubuntu (the most widely used desktop Linux by far) will >>> force a >>> filesystem check periodically. >> >> I just noticed turd chrisv claiming I am lying... LOL! >> > > Don't waste your time with that idiot. Once again he has absolutely nothing > of value to add other than leg humping someone who is proven to be factually > wrong. The useless turd is too busy frothing and screaming to even > comprehend a simple sentence. > > <quote> > ... fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will *ONLY* trigger an > actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. > </quote> > >> Once more sMarti ends up with egg on his face me-tooing known morons. >> >> I hope the "new Chris" corrects the idiots. > > I think he just did. Facts are facts. And the *fact* is that fsck does not > run "only" if the filesystem is marked dirty. (you can configure it this > way - but it is not the default and the claim is still wrong.) In fairness it believe it was TomB who dragged poor sMarti and dumb Willy in. The turd is generally ignored for obvious reasons.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 12:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0a6fv6he306v7029dkndr6bn7qtrbd7fh8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #32916 |
Ezekiel wrote: ><quote> > ... fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will *ONLY* trigger an >actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. > </quote> You took that out of context, fsckwit. TomB explains, here: <20110614190644.945@usenet.drumscum.be> > Facts are facts. And the *fact* is that fsck does not >run "only" if the filesystem is marked dirty. Who has claimed otherwise, fsckwit? Poor "Ezekiel" was giddy with excitement, thinking that, perhaps, he had, for *once*, gotten the better of me. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 13:38 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Time To flush the "chrisv" turd... Hahahahha... |
| Message-ID | <it86b8$ft6$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #32934 |
piece of shit asshole "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:0a6fv6he306v7029dkndr6bn7qtrbd7fh8@4ax.com... go fsck yourself you mentally ill piece of shit stalker. "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web