Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #597459 > unrolled thread

"Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid

Started byRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
First post2021-10-31 23:16 +0000
Last post2021-11-04 06:33 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 97 — 20 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2021-10-31 23:16 +0000
    Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-10-31 23:22 +0000
      Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2021-10-31 23:33 +0000
        Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-31 19:44 -0600
          Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid Dustin who does stuff with miceless computers <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-31 21:46 -0700
          Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2021-11-01 09:39 +0000
          Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-01 08:41 -0400
            Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2021-11-01 15:24 +0000
              Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-01 12:00 -0400
                Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2021-11-01 16:09 +0000
                  Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-01 12:59 -0400
                    Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-11-01 21:03 -0600
                      Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-02 08:43 -0400
                        Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-11-02 07:58 -0600
                        An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-02 10:42 -0700
                          Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-02 16:15 -0400
                            Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-11-02 19:54 -0600
                              Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2021-11-03 04:18 -0700
                              Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-11-03 06:36 -0500
                                Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-11-03 07:55 -0600
                                  Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. Dustin who does stuff with miceless computers <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-11-03 08:09 -0700
                                  Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2021-11-03 09:31 -0700
                                  Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-11-03 12:38 -0500
                                    Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. Stephen Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 05:26 -0700
                              Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-03 08:51 -0400
                                Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. coffee.drinker <coffee.drinker@invalid.com> - 2021-11-04 06:33 +0000
                                  Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-04 08:11 -0400
                                    Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 15:35 +0000
                                      Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-04 11:44 -0400
                                        Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 15:54 +0000
                                          Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. coffee.drinker <coffee.drinker@invalid.com> - 2021-11-04 16:11 +0000
                                        Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-11-04 11:32 -0500
                                        For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-06 15:33 -0700
                                          Re: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-06 21:19 -0700
                                            Starmaker, How is Windows 95 working out for you ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-07 02:32 -0800
                                              Re: Starmaker, How is Windows 95 working out for you ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 10:32 -0800
                                                Why Windows 95 ?  Why python ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-07 14:22 -0800
                                                  Re: Why Windows 95 ? Why python ? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-07 17:00 -0600
                                                  Re: Why Windows 95 ?  Why python ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 15:57 -0800
                                                    Re: Why Windows 95 ? Why python ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-11-07 18:47 -0700
                                                      Re: Why Windows 95 ? Why python ? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 20:34 -0800
                                                      Re: Why Windows 95 ? Why python ? Dusty Crook <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 02:25 -0800
                                            Re: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-07 08:15 -0500
                                              Re: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-11-07 10:39 -0800
                                                Re: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-07 14:50 -0500
                                                  Re: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-07 13:54 -0600
                                          Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-09 14:45 -0800
                                            Re: Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-11-09 16:59 -0600
                                              Re: Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa. Dick_Holder <dick_holder@man.invalid> - 2021-11-09 23:09 +0000
                                                Re: Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa. Dick_Holder <dick_holder@man.invalid> - 2021-11-09 23:12 +0000
                                              Re: Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa. Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2021-11-09 15:14 -0800
                                            Christianity refined prior religions. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-10 17:59 -0800
                                              Re: Christianity refined prior religions. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-10 20:26 -0600
                                                ClutterFreak worships a narcissistic deadbeat ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-10 18:47 -0800
                                                  Re: ClutterFreak worships a narcissistic deadbeat ?! Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-10 21:22 -0600
                                                    English please, ClutterFreak, we don't speak random. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-10 19:36 -0800
                                                      Asians are (literally) hit the hardest. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-11-10 23:19 -0800
                                                        Re: Asians are (literally) hit the hardest. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-11-12 10:52 -0600
                                      Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. coffee.drinker <coffee.drinker@invalid.com> - 2021-11-04 16:11 +0000
                                        Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-04 12:17 -0400
                                          Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 16:47 +0000
                                            Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-11-04 11:57 -0500
                                            Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2021-11-04 12:18 -0700
                                      Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-11-04 11:18 -0500
                                        Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-04 12:26 -0400
                                          Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 16:55 +0000
                                            Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-11-04 11:58 -0500
                                            Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-04 13:32 -0400
                                              Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-11-04 12:40 -0500
                                              Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. coffee.drinker <coffee.drinker@invalid.com> - 2021-11-05 03:01 +0000
                                                Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-05 07:48 -0400
                                                  Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. coffee.drinker <coffee.drinker@invalid.com> - 2021-11-05 14:03 +0000
                                    Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. coffee.drinker <coffee.drinker@invalid.com> - 2021-11-04 16:11 +0000
                                      Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-04 12:16 -0400
                                        Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-11-04 21:08 +0000
                                          Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-11-04 17:03 -0500
                                          Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-04 18:38 -0400
                                            Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. Snit Michael Glasser <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 16:53 -0700
                                            Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59. coffee.drinker <coffee.drinker@invalid.com> - 2021-11-05 03:01 +0000
              Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2021-11-01 10:09 -0700
        Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2021-11-01 08:41 -0700
          Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-01 12:08 -0400
            Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2021-11-01 10:30 -0700
              Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-11-01 12:40 -0500
          Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-01 12:57 -0400
          Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-11-01 12:00 -0500
            Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-01 16:22 -0400
              Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid Dusty Cook <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-11-01 15:42 -0700
              Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2021-11-01 15:52 -0700
              Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2021-11-02 00:59 +0000
                Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-11-01 21:56 -0400
        Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid coffee.drinker <coffee.drinker@invalid.com> - 2021-11-04 06:33 +0000
          Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid Stephen Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-11-04 03:19 -0700
    Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-11-01 08:45 -0500
      Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-11-02 03:27 +0000
        Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid Dusty Kook <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-11-02 11:05 -0700
        Re: "Fully vaccinated" Jen Psaki has Covid coffee.drinker <coffee.drinker@invalid.com> - 2021-11-04 06:33 +0000

Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →


#597951 — Re: Why Windows 95 ? Why python ?

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-11-07 20:34 -0800
SubjectRe: Why Windows 95 ? Why python ?
Message-ID<6188A8CD.468B@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#597942
rbowman wrote:
> 
> On 11/07/2021 04:57 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Jeff-Relf.Me, @. wrote:
> >>
> >> Why Windows 95 ?  Why python ?
> >
> > The program worked before in win95..and stopped working.
> >
> > So it needs to be rewritten to work again.
> >
> > Fastforward, using python may work around what stopped it from working
> > in win95.
> >
> > Using python,
> > a GUI application in tkinter. nntplib...
> >
> >
> > I'm breaking new ground.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Python 2.7 or Python 3.x?

3.8
-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#597955 — Re: Why Windows 95 ? Why python ?

FromDusty Crook <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2021-11-08 02:25 -0800
SubjectRe: Why Windows 95 ? Why python ?
Message-ID<b6dd9b7f-7f63-4ff5-bf28-0dd657746383n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#597942
On Sunday, November 7, 2021 at 6:47:49 PM UTC-7, rbowman wrote:
> On 11/07/2021 04:57 PM, The Starmaker wrote: 
> > Jeff-Relf.Me, @. wrote: 
> >> 
> >> Why Windows 95 ? Why python ? 
> > 
> > The program worked before in win95..and stopped working. 
> > 
> > So it needs to be rewritten to work again. 
> > 
> > Fastforward, using python may work around what stopped it from working 
> > in win95. 
> > 
> > Using python, 
> > a GUI application in tkinter. nntplib... 
> > 
> > 
> > I'm breaking new ground. 
> > 
> > 
> >
> Python 2.7 or Python 3.x?


But Wolffan feels the need to please the herd. I see you are choosing to 
flounder in Wolffan's circle of sock puppets and false flag ops over a consideration 
that would have been a bit more 'compelling'. There are ever reducing reasons 
to come to Google Groups and boring crap like this puts a spotlight on why 
that's true. 

The entire buffoonery is brimming of ridiculous holes and leans heavily 
on Wolffan's 'psych degree' horseplay. 

All that he cares about is that Wolffan gets to broadcast his robocall and 
then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that David is an involuntary target 
on the other end of the phone is the game. 

- 
What Every Entrepreneur Must Know!!
https://redd.it/6sfkup
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=%22functional%20illiterate%20fraud%22
Dustin Cook the Fraud

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#597900 — Re: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature.

FromRabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar>
Date2021-11-07 08:15 -0500
SubjectRe: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature.
Message-ID<xjQhJ.43639$SR4.34045@fx43.iad>
In reply to#597893
On 2021-11-07 12:19 a.m., The Starmaker wrote:
> Jeff-Relf.Me, @. wrote:
>>
>> You (Rabid) replied ( to RonB ):
>>>> [ Prove God doesn't exist, MrRussian ]
>>>
>>> [ He'll argue that a true God wouldn't allow evil ]
>>
>> Few agree on who/what "God" might be.
>>
>> For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature;
>> others would (violently) disagree, of course.
> 
> God is a short word for Good, and you cannot have the good without the
> bad.
> 
> you cannot have a positive without a negative
> 
> or a right without a left
> 
> right or wrong
> 
> light or dark
> 
> etc, etc, ect.

Neo without Agent Smith.


-- 
@RabidHussar
Proudly cable-free

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#597918 — Re: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature.

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2021-11-07 10:39 -0800
SubjectRe: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature.
Message-ID<61881D55.5E65@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#597900
RabidHussar wrote:
> 
> On 2021-11-07 12:19 a.m., The Starmaker wrote:
> > Jeff-Relf.Me, @. wrote:
> >>
> >> You (Rabid) replied ( to RonB ):
> >>>> [ Prove God doesn't exist, MrRussian ]
> >>>
> >>> [ He'll argue that a true God wouldn't allow evil ]
> >>
> >> Few agree on who/what "God" might be.
> >>
> >> For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature;
> >> others would (violently) disagree, of course.
> >
> > God is a short word for Good, and you cannot have the good without the
> > bad.
> >
> > you cannot have a positive without a negative
> >
> > or a right without a left
> >
> > right or wrong
> >
> > light or dark
> >
> > etc, etc, ect.
> 
> Neo without Agent Smith.
> 
> --
> @RabidHussar
> Proudly cable-free

wat does the ar in huss.ar stand for? Arkansas??   


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#597922 — Re: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature.

FromRabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar>
Date2021-11-07 14:50 -0500
SubjectRe: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature.
Message-ID<j6WhJ.20586$7D4.12233@fx37.iad>
In reply to#597918
On 2021-11-07 1:39 p.m., The Starmaker wrote:
> RabidHussar wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-11-07 12:19 a.m., The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Jeff-Relf.Me, @. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You (Rabid) replied ( to RonB ):
>>>>>> [ Prove God doesn't exist, MrRussian ]
>>>>>
>>>>> [ He'll argue that a true God wouldn't allow evil ]
>>>>
>>>> Few agree on who/what "God" might be.
>>>>
>>>> For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature;
>>>> others would (violently) disagree, of course.
>>>
>>> God is a short word for Good, and you cannot have the good without the
>>> bad.
>>>
>>> you cannot have a positive without a negative
>>>
>>> or a right without a left
>>>
>>> right or wrong
>>>
>>> light or dark
>>>
>>> etc, etc, ect.
>>
>> Neo without Agent Smith.
>>
>> --
>> @RabidHussar
>> Proudly cable-free
> 
> wat does the ar in huss.ar stand for? Arkansas??

Arsehole.


-- 
@RabidHussar
Proudly cable-free

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#597923 — Re: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature.

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2021-11-07 13:54 -0600
SubjectRe: For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature.
Message-ID<iuqp6qFkjnlU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#597922
On 11/7/2021 1:50 PM, RabidHussar wrote:
> On 2021-11-07 1:39 p.m., The Starmaker wrote:
>> RabidHussar wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2021-11-07 12:19 a.m., The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> Jeff-Relf.Me, @. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You (Rabid) replied ( to RonB ):
>>>>>>> [ Prove God doesn't exist, MrRussian ]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ He'll argue that a true God wouldn't allow evil ]
>>>>>
>>>>> Few agree on who/what "God" might be.
>>>>>
>>>>> For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature;
>>>>> others would (violently) disagree, of course.
>>>>
>>>> God is a short word for Good, and you cannot have the good without the
>>>> bad.
>>>>
>>>> you cannot have a positive without a negative
>>>>
>>>> or a right without a left
>>>>
>>>> right or wrong
>>>>
>>>> light or dark
>>>>
>>>> etc, etc, ect.
>>>
>>> Neo without Agent Smith.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> @RabidHussar
>>> Proudly cable-free
>>
>> wat does the ar in huss.ar stand for? Arkansas??
> 
> Arsehole.

Or is it arswhole?


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598077 — Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2021-11-09 14:45 -0800
SubjectHitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.9--2.45pm.Seattle.2021>
In reply to#597880
You (Dhruv) replied ( to me ): 
> > For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature; 
> > others would (violently) disagree, of course.
> 
> 'Adolf Hitler was a pantheist who believed
>  nature was the only true “God.”'

For some, pantheism is empowering, not unifying;
Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.

> I am not sure what to believe.  
> Some people think forests are sentient.

Forests are sentient, in my (worthless) opinion.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598079 — Re: Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.

Fromwhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Date2021-11-09 16:59 -0600
SubjectRe: Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.
Message-ID<iv0cpsFn16gU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#598077
On 11/9/2021 4:45 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> You (Dhruv) replied ( to me ):
>>> For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature;
>>> others would (violently) disagree, of course.
>>
>> 'Adolf Hitler was a pantheist who believed
>>   nature was the only true “God.”'
> 
> For some, pantheism is empowering, not unifying;
> Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.
> 
>> I am not sure what to believe.
>> Some people think forests are sentient.
> 
> Forests are sentient, in my (worthless) opinion.

Does that make an individual tree semi-sentient, or what?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598080 — Re: Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.

FromDick_Holder <dick_holder@man.invalid>
Date2021-11-09 23:09 +0000
SubjectRe: Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.
Message-ID<smev32$pf3$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598079
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 16:59:07 -0600, whodat, typed
> On 11/9/2021 4:45 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> You (Dhruv) replied ( to me ):
>>>> For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature;
>>>> others would (violently) disagree, of course.
>>>
>>> 'Adolf Hitler was a pantheist who believed
>>>   nature was the only true “God.”'
>> 
>> For some, pantheism is empowering, not unifying;
>> Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.
>> 
>>> I am not sure what to believe.
>>> Some people think forests are sentient.
>> 
>> Forests are sentient, in my (worthless) opinion.
>
> Does that make an individual tree semi-sentient, or what?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pando_(tree)

-- 
End of buffer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598081 — Re: Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.

FromDick_Holder <dick_holder@man.invalid>
Date2021-11-09 23:12 +0000
SubjectRe: Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.
Message-ID<smev80$pf3$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#598080
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 23:09:22 -0000 (UTC), Dick_Holder, typed
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 16:59:07 -0600, whodat, typed
>> On 11/9/2021 4:45 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>> You (Dhruv) replied ( to me ):
>>>>> For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature;
>>>>> others would (violently) disagree, of course.
>>>>
>>>> 'Adolf Hitler was a pantheist who believed
>>>>   nature was the only true “God.”'
>>> 
>>> For some, pantheism is empowering, not unifying;
>>> Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.
>>> 
>>>> I am not sure what to believe.
>>>> Some people think forests are sentient.
>>> 
>>> Forests are sentient, in my (worthless) opinion.
>>
>> Does that make an individual tree semi-sentient, or what?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pando_(tree)
>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pando_ (tree)

_( fuck up that link

-- 
End of buffer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598083 — Re: Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.

FromJim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Date2021-11-09 15:14 -0800
SubjectRe: Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.
Message-ID<b0cr5i-fru.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
In reply to#598079
In sci.physics whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote:
> On 11/9/2021 4:45 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> You (Dhruv) replied ( to me ):
>>>> For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature;
>>>> others would (violently) disagree, of course.
>>>
>>> 'Adolf Hitler was a pantheist who believed
>>>   nature was the only true “God.”'
>> 
>> For some, pantheism is empowering, not unifying;
>> Hitler wanted to kill Einstein & vice versa.
>> 
>>> I am not sure what to believe.
>>> Some people think forests are sentient.
>> 
>> Forests are sentient, in my (worthless) opinion.
> 
> Does that make an individual tree semi-sentient, or what?

I am Groot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598161 — Christianity refined prior religions.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2021-11-10 17:59 -0800
SubjectChristianity refined prior religions.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.10--5.59pm.Seattle.2021>
In reply to#598077
You (Dhruv) replied ( to me ):
> > > > For me, Einstein & Spinoza, "God" is nature; 
> 
> I am an atheist but wish there were Gods in existence.

Nature is Thee God, not a God.

Nature, the cosmos; nothing more, nothing less.

> After reading Greg Bear's THE VISITATION yesterday I was 
> wondering if the Trinity is a partial return to pantheism?

Christianity refined prior religions.

The best art merely refines prior art.

Joe Biden thinks he's Thee God & we're his subjects;
he preaches _fear_ with great abandon (!)
because every FlyByNight cult needs its Apocalypse.

FlyByNight, fear mongering cult !

Again: The best art refines prior art.
Yet "trust fund babies" ( euphemistically called "communists" )
try their damnedest to _destroy_ prior art.

> > Forests are sentient, in my (worthless) opinion.
> 
> I don't agree your opinion is worthless.

The value of my opinions depends on who you are, obviously.

My opinions are _everything_ ( to me ); 
yet, at the same time, they're _nothing_ ( to others ).

Life everything, yet nothing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598163 — Re: Christianity refined prior religions.

FromClutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com>
Date2021-11-10 20:26 -0600
SubjectRe: Christianity refined prior religions.
Message-ID<smhv03$fa3$1@solani.org>
In reply to#598161
On 11/10/2021 7:59 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> 
> Thee Trump is Thee God, Thee _everything_ ( to me ); not God.
> 

Good for a Jack Mormon for sure :)





-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598165 — ClutterFreak worships a narcissistic deadbeat ?!

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2021-11-10 18:47 -0800
SubjectClutterFreak worships a narcissistic deadbeat ?!
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.10--6.47pm.Seattle.2021>
In reply to#598163
ClutterFreak wrote:
> Thee Trump is Thee God, Thee _everything_ ( to me ); not God.

You worship a narcissistic deadbeat ?!

again:

    Joe Biden thinks he's Thee God & we're his subjects;
    he preaches _fear_ with great abandon (!)
    because every FlyByNight cult needs its Apocalypse.

    FlyByNight, fear mongering cult !

    The best art refines prior art.
    Yet "trust fund babies" ( euphemistically called "communists" )
    try their damnedest to _destroy_ prior art.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598168 — Re: ClutterFreak worships a narcissistic deadbeat ?!

FromClutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com>
Date2021-11-10 21:22 -0600
SubjectRe: ClutterFreak worships a narcissistic deadbeat ?!
Message-ID<smi29d$rh4$1@solani.org>
In reply to#598165
On 11/10/2021 8:47 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> 
> 
> again: Thee Trump is Thee best art refined and I thee "trust fund baby" worship Thee narcissistic 
> Trump like no prior art preaches euphemistically.
> 


Yep. Jack Mormons!

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598170 — English please, ClutterFreak, we don't speak random.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2021-11-10 19:36 -0800
SubjectEnglish please, ClutterFreak, we don't speak random.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.10--7.36pm.Seattle.2021>
In reply to#598168
ClutterFreak wrote:
> again: Thee Trump is Thee best art refined and
> I thee "trust fund baby" worship Thee narcissistic 
> Trump like no prior art preaches euphemistically.  Jack Mormons !

English please, ClutterFreak, we don't speak random.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598182 — Asians are (literally) hit the hardest.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2021-11-10 23:19 -0800
SubjectAsians are (literally) hit the hardest.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.10--11.19pm.Seattle.2021>
In reply to#598170
You (Ayaz_Siddiqi) replied ( to me ):
> You are an enemy combatant who wants to spread 
> disinformation in order to enslave and destroy non white races. 

"My" Seattle actively discriminates against Asians & whites;
Asians are (literally) hit the hardest.

This murder victim is from Ecuador but, 
because he's a (small) landlord, he's an honorary Asian:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aBlMCWcZYI

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#598276 — Re: Asians are (literally) hit the hardest.

FromClutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com>
Date2021-11-12 10:52 -0600
SubjectRe: Asians are (literally) hit the hardest.
Message-ID<smm63q$phd$1@solani.org>
In reply to#598182
On 11/11/2021 1:19 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> 
> 
> I  Jeff  Relf  am  schizophrenic  Seattle actively discriminates against Asians & whites;
> I  am  murder   victim  from  Ecuador  but...  euphemistically honorary  Asian
> 
> 


Either that or your codes've got mixed with your brain language sites. 
At last! :)


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#597721 — Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59.

Fromcoffee.drinker <coffee.drinker@invalid.com>
Date2021-11-04 16:11 +0000
SubjectRe: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59.
Message-ID<sm10nh$cds$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#597707
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2021-11-04, RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> wrote:
>> On 2021-11-04 2:33 a.m., coffee.drinker wrote:
>>> RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> wrote:
>>>> On 2021-11-02 9:54 p.m., rbowman wrote:
>>>>> On 11/02/2021 02:15 PM, RabidHussar wrote:
>>>>>> On 2021-11-02 1:42 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>>>>> Rabid:
>>>>>>>> I'm still at least twelve years away from when I'd like to retire.
>>>>>>>> I'm supposed to do it at 59 but
>>>>>>>> there's a chance that I'll do it at 55.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You'll have an 18-year-old "kid" at age 59.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm aware, homey. Of course, I'll suddenly have tons of time to play
>>>>>> video games with him or practise kicking the ball around. I'm looking
>>>>>> forward to it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> My father was going to retire when I graduated. He died in my senior
>>>>> year. Just saying...
>>>> 
>>>> I have a mostly vegetarian diet and work out. I should be fine. If I'm
>>>> not, I will have spent a good amount of time with my boy anyway and he
>>>> will have good memories of me. Otherwise, I give myself to God.
>>> 
>>> There is no God. Wake the fuck up.
> 
> Prove it. (You're the one making the assertion — sans facts.)
> 
>> I find your lack of belief troubling but not infectious. Enjoy Hell.
> 
> Hopefully not. Hopefully he'll grow a brain before he dies.
> 

Prove there is a God.

-- 
Hot Cappuccino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#597726 — Re: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59.

FromRabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar>
Date2021-11-04 12:17 -0400
SubjectRe: An 18-year-old "kid" at age 59.
Message-ID<GITgJ.5989$xe2.3767@fx16.iad>
In reply to#597721
On 2021-11-04 12:11 p.m., coffee.drinker wrote:
> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2021-11-04, RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> wrote:
>>> On 2021-11-04 2:33 a.m., coffee.drinker wrote:
>>>> RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> wrote:
>>>>> On 2021-11-02 9:54 p.m., rbowman wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/02/2021 02:15 PM, RabidHussar wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2021-11-02 1:42 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rabid:
>>>>>>>>> I'm still at least twelve years away from when I'd like to retire.
>>>>>>>>> I'm supposed to do it at 59 but
>>>>>>>>> there's a chance that I'll do it at 55.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You'll have an 18-year-old "kid" at age 59.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm aware, homey. Of course, I'll suddenly have tons of time to play
>>>>>>> video games with him or practise kicking the ball around. I'm looking
>>>>>>> forward to it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My father was going to retire when I graduated. He died in my senior
>>>>>> year. Just saying...
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a mostly vegetarian diet and work out. I should be fine. If I'm
>>>>> not, I will have spent a good amount of time with my boy anyway and he
>>>>> will have good memories of me. Otherwise, I give myself to God.
>>>>
>>>> There is no God. Wake the fuck up.
>>
>> Prove it. (You're the one making the assertion — sans facts.)
>>
>>> I find your lack of belief troubling but not infectious. Enjoy Hell.
>>
>> Hopefully not. Hopefully he'll grow a brain before he dies.
>>
> 
> Prove there is a God.

He does a much better job than anyone here could: 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjHhtWL_3Og>


-- 
@RabidHussar
Happy to shove that vaccine of yours up your ass.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web