Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #17893 > unrolled thread

The iPad already used more than Linux computers

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  The iPad already used more than Linux computers Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-04-23 21:07 +0200
    Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-23 21:24 +0200
      Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-23 16:11 -0400
        Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-24 00:59 +0100
          Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-04-23 23:20 +0000
            Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-04-23 23:23 +0000
              Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-24 10:43 +0100
                Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2011-04-24 20:38 +0100
                  Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-24 23:06 +0100
                    Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-24 19:17 -0400
                      Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 20:48 -0400
                        Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-24 21:19 -0400
                          Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-25 08:04 +0000
                            Re: Another lying piece of shit anti-linux troll Zeke froths. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 10:37 +0100
                              Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 07:55 -0400
                                Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 08:37 -0400
                              Re: Another lying piece of shit anti-linux troll Zeke froths. flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 08:28 -0400
                          Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-25 08:05 +0000
                            Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 07:58 -0400
                              Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 08:27 -0400
                                Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:00 -0400
                                  Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-25 09:07 -0500
                                    Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass "caged steel" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:24 -0400
                                    Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass Big Steel <Steel98@steel98.com> - 2011-04-25 11:01 -0400
                    Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2011-04-25 00:28 +0100
                      Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 10:55 +0100
                        Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 09:14 -0400
                    Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2011-04-24 17:36 -0600
                      Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-04-25 22:23 +0200
                    Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 20:32 -0400
                  Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-24 20:48 -0400
                    Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 21:21 -0400
                      Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-04-25 22:37 +0200
                        Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 22:53 -0400
            Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-23 22:13 -0700
              Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 01:21 -0400
      Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-04-23 23:58 +0100
        Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-24 00:58 +0200
          Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-04-24 23:24 +0100
            Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-24 23:40 +0100
        Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-23 22:21 -0400
    Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2011-04-23 22:01 +0100
      Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-23 17:18 -0400
        Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-23 22:05 -0400
    Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-04-23 23:23 +0100
      Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-23 22:17 -0400
        Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-04-24 22:00 +0200
          Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 16:10 -0400
          Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-24 19:40 -0400
            Re: The iPad already used more than Linux computers Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-04-25 12:06 +0200

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#17893 — The iPad already used more than Linux computers

http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/04/20/ipad-used-more-than-linux-computers/

"We noticed an interesting thing the other day that we'd like to share with 
you. However, if you're a Linux enthusiast, you may want to stop reading 
now."

LMFAO

-- 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta in January 2009, Linux
had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
[............]
"Ultimately, Linux is doomed on the desktop because of a critical lack of
content. And that lack of content owes its existence to two key factors: the
fragmentation of the Linux platform, and the fierce ideology of the
open-source community at large."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#17894

"Clog_-_wog (®)" <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> writes:

> http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/04/20/ipad-used-more-than-linux-computers/
>
> "We noticed an interesting thing the other day that we'd like to share with
> you. However, if you're a Linux enthusiast, you may want to stop reading now."
>
> LMFAO


Hmm, I see Linux has dropped to 0.7%. Not good.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17903

On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 21:24:18 +0200, Hadron wrote:

> "Clog_-_wog (®)" <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> writes:
> 
>> http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/04/20/ipad-used-more-than-linux-computers/
>>
>> "We noticed an interesting thing the other day that we'd like to share with
>> you. However, if you're a Linux enthusiast, you may want to stop reading now."
>>
>> LMFAO
> 
> 
> Hmm, I see Linux has dropped to 0.7%. Not good.

Someone should just pull the plug on desktop Linux.
It's an epic fail.

-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17968

On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:11:40 -0400, flatfish+++ chiseled
mfigpb4hxsdk.13omgcrh2qbl3.dlg@40tude.net in stone using Trajan:

> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 21:24:18 +0200, Hadron wrote:
> 
>> "Clog_-_wog (®)" <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> writes:
>> 
>>> http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/04/20/ipad-used-more-than-linux-
computers/
>>>
>>> "We noticed an interesting thing the other day that we'd like to share
>>> with you. However, if you're a Linux enthusiast, you may want to stop
>>> reading now."
>>>
>>> LMFAO
>> 
>> 
>> Hmm, I see Linux has dropped to 0.7%. Not good.
> 
> Someone should just pull the plug on desktop Linux. It's an epic fail.

Nah, as long as it does what I need it to do, I'm ok with it. Even if I 
become the last user of desktop Linux on the planet.

In other news, one of the cells on my 6 cell battery in my netbook seems 
to have failed, as I can only charge up to 87% now. In practical terms, 
I've lost about an hour of use when using the battery: down to a little 
over 4 hours now. I'm trying to decide between buying a new 9-cell battery 
to replace it or buying one of System 76's netbooks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17975

On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 00:59:06 +0100, An Old Friend wrote:

> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:11:40 -0400, flatfish+++ chiseled
> mfigpb4hxsdk.13omgcrh2qbl3.dlg@40tude.net in stone using Trajan:
> 
>> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 21:24:18 +0200, Hadron wrote:
>> 
>>> "Clog_-_wog (®)" <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> writes:
>>> 
>>>> http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/04/20/ipad-used-more-than-linux-
> computers/
>>>>
>>>> "We noticed an interesting thing the other day that we'd like to
>>>> share with you. However, if you're a Linux enthusiast, you may want
>>>> to stop reading now."
>>>>
>>>> LMFAO
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hmm, I see Linux has dropped to 0.7%. Not good.
>> 
>> Someone should just pull the plug on desktop Linux. It's an epic fail.
> 
> Nah, as long as it does what I need it to do, I'm ok with it. Even if I
> become the last user of desktop Linux on the planet.
> 
> In other news, one of the cells on my 6 cell battery in my netbook seems
> to have failed, as I can only charge up to 87% now. In practical terms,
> I've lost about an hour of use when using the battery: down to a little
> over 4 hours now. I'm trying to decide between buying a new 9-cell
> battery to replace it or buying one of System 76's netbooks.

Same old pipe dream for the WinTrolls. They think of "Desktop Linux" as a 
single "product" that has to please stockholders quarter by quarter. 
Unfortunately, for them, Linux distributions are put together by a whole 
lot of volunteers who aren't about to quit releasing new versions of their 
distributions just because some toady for Microsoft writes a negative 
article or two. There's nobody for Gates to buy out or threaten into 
extinction.

Learn to live it, WinTrolls, Desktop Linux isn't going anywhere. Meanwhile 
embedded Linux, Linux on servers and mobile Linux are eating Microsoft's 
lunch. You'll have to learn to live with that also. 

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.6 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#17976

On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:20:55 +0000, RonB wrote:

> Same old pipe dream for the WinTrolls. They think of "Desktop Linux" as
> a single "product" that has to please stockholders quarter by quarter.
> Unfortunately, for them, Linux distributions are put together by a whole
> lot of volunteers who aren't about to quit releasing new versions of
> their distributions just because some toady for Microsoft writes a
> negative article or two. There's nobody for Gates to buy out or threaten
> into extinction.
> 
> Learn to live it, WinTrolls, Desktop Linux isn't going anywhere.
> Meanwhile embedded Linux, Linux on servers and mobile Linux are eating
> Microsoft's lunch. You'll have to learn to live with that also.

And, again, if Desktop Linux is so "inconsequential" why do WinTrolls rail 
on about it 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy Newsgroup?

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.6 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18063

RonB wrote:

> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:20:55 +0000, RonB wrote:
>
>> Same old pipe dream for the WinTrolls. They think of "Desktop Linux" as
>> a single "product" that has to please stockholders quarter by quarter.
>> Unfortunately, for them, Linux distributions are put together by a whole
>> lot of volunteers who aren't about to quit releasing new versions of
>> their distributions just because some toady for Microsoft writes a
>> negative article or two. There's nobody for Gates to buy out or threaten
>> into extinction.
>> 
>> Learn to live it, WinTrolls, Desktop Linux isn't going anywhere.
>> Meanwhile embedded Linux, Linux on servers and mobile Linux are eating
>> Microsoft's lunch. You'll have to learn to live with that also.
>
> And, again, if Desktop Linux is so "inconsequential" why do WinTrolls rail 
> on about it 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy Newsgroup?

Indeed, & why was M$ so worried about "linux having only 1% market
share" that they hired an Open Source Desktop Strategy Czar ("a strong
team member to lead Microsoft’s global desktop competitive strategy as
it relates to open source competitors.”)
 Are the wintrolls so busy chanting their "1%" mantra (in the vain hope
that it's true) that they don't read the news?


-- 
A)bort, R)etry, I)nfluence with large hammer.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18161

William Poaster wrote:

> RonB wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:20:55 +0000, RonB wrote:
>>
>>> Same old pipe dream for the WinTrolls. They think of "Desktop Linux" as
>>> a single "product" that has to please stockholders quarter by quarter.
>>> Unfortunately, for them, Linux distributions are put together by a whole
>>> lot of volunteers who aren't about to quit releasing new versions of
>>> their distributions just because some toady for Microsoft writes a
>>> negative article or two. There's nobody for Gates to buy out or threaten
>>> into extinction.
>>> 
>>> Learn to live it, WinTrolls, Desktop Linux isn't going anywhere.
>>> Meanwhile embedded Linux, Linux on servers and mobile Linux are eating
>>> Microsoft's lunch. You'll have to learn to live with that also.
>>
>> And, again, if Desktop Linux is so "inconsequential" why do WinTrolls
>> rail on about it 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy Newsgroup?
> 
> Indeed, & why was M$ so worried about "linux having only 1% market
> share" that they hired an Open Source Desktop Strategy Czar ("a strong
> team member to lead Microsoft’s global desktop competitive strategy as
> it relates to open source competitors.”)
>  Are the wintrolls so busy chanting their "1%" mantra (in the vain hope
> that it's true) that they don't read the news?


The simplest of all reason is the most plausible.

They just don't know how to count Linux.

If they did, then they would be able to put that into
their SEC filing. 

So what they can't count hurts them.
It counts against them as disappearing sales.

Not a bright future there for windummies no matter
how you look at it because their sales are dwindling despite
boasting meaningless market share figures figures.

All your desktops belong to us says Linux and
micohsaftees turn that around and say look at market share.
Quoting market share to browser share are meaningless if they
are not measuring how many users actually sat in front of computers using
a given OS.

It should be physical PC desktop usage share which I reckon is at least 7%
globally for Linux. Some sort of name must be given to this share so
that everyone can agree they are measuring the same thing and how
they came to measure it.
7% puts it past the magic 7% threshold for declaring Linux as mainstream
which I reckon where its at today.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18190

7 wrote:

> William Poaster wrote:
>
>> RonB wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:20:55 +0000, RonB wrote:
>>>
>>>> Same old pipe dream for the WinTrolls. They think of "Desktop Linux" as
>>>> a single "product" that has to please stockholders quarter by quarter.
>>>> Unfortunately, for them, Linux distributions are put together by a whole
>>>> lot of volunteers who aren't about to quit releasing new versions of
>>>> their distributions just because some toady for Microsoft writes a
>>>> negative article or two. There's nobody for Gates to buy out or threaten
>>>> into extinction.
>>>> 
>>>> Learn to live it, WinTrolls, Desktop Linux isn't going anywhere.
>>>> Meanwhile embedded Linux, Linux on servers and mobile Linux are eating
>>>> Microsoft's lunch. You'll have to learn to live with that also.
>>>
>>> And, again, if Desktop Linux is so "inconsequential" why do WinTrolls
>>> rail on about it 24/7 in a Linux Advocacy Newsgroup?
>> 
>> Indeed, & why was M$ so worried about "linux having only 1% market
>> share" that they hired an Open Source Desktop Strategy Czar ("a strong
>> team member to lead Microsoft’s global desktop competitive strategy as
>> it relates to open source competitors.”)
>>  Are the wintrolls so busy chanting their "1%" mantra (in the vain hope
>> that it's true) that they don't read the news?
>
>
> The simplest of all reason is the most plausible.
>
> They just don't know how to count Linux.
>
> If they did, then they would be able to put that into
> their SEC filing. 

In their SEC filing M$ (guess)estimates Linux users at 10-12% & possibly
as much as 14%, & warns that this can affect their business & drop in
revenue.

> So what they can't count hurts them.
> It counts against them as disappearing sales.
>
> Not a bright future there for windummies no matter
> how you look at it because their sales are dwindling despite
> boasting meaningless market share figures figures.
>
> All your desktops belong to us says Linux and
> micohsaftees turn that around and say look at market share.
> Quoting market share to browser share are meaningless if they
> are not measuring how many users actually sat in front of computers using
> a given OS.
>
> It should be physical PC desktop usage share which I reckon is at least 7%
> globally for Linux. Some sort of name must be given to this share so
> that everyone can agree they are measuring the same thing and how
> they came to measure it.
> 7% puts it past the magic 7% threshold for declaring Linux as mainstream
> which I reckon where its at today.

-- 
"!sgub evah t'nseod CP sihT ?sgub naem ayaddahW"
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18205 — Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass

"William Poaster" <wp@induh-vidual.net> wrote in message 
news:tfje88-vf7.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org...
>
> In their SEC filing M$ (guess)estimates Linux users at 10-12% & possibly
> as much as 14%, & warns that this can affect their business & drop in
> revenue.
>

Here's the official SEC filing Dumb Willy - where *exactly* does Microsoft 
say any such thing?

   http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/789019/000119312511026916/d8k.htm

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18229 — Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass

On 4/24/2011 7:17 PM, Ezekiel wrote:
> "William Poaster"<wp@induh-vidual.net>  wrote in message
> news:tfje88-vf7.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org...
>>
>> In their SEC filing M$ (guess)estimates Linux users at 10-12%&  possibly
>> as much as 14%,&  warns that this can affect their business&  drop in
>> revenue.
>>
>
> Here's the official SEC filing Dumb Willy - where *exactly* does Microsoft
> say any such thing?
>
>     http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/789019/000119312511026916/d8k.htm


Don't hold your breath.  This is cola, and Dumb Willie is an "advocate".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18238 — Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass

"DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in message news:ip2gca$vvf$4@dont-email.me...
> On 4/24/2011 7:17 PM, Ezekiel wrote:
>> "William Poaster"<wp@induh-vidual.net>  wrote in message
>> news:tfje88-vf7.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org...
>>>
>>> In their SEC filing M$ (guess)estimates Linux users at 10-12%&  possibly
>>> as much as 14%,&  warns that this can affect their business&  drop in
>>> revenue.
>>>
>>
>> Here's the official SEC filing Dumb Willy - where *exactly* does 
>> Microsoft
>> say any such thing?
>>
>> 
>> http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/789019/000119312511026916/d8k.htm
>
>
> Don't hold your breath.  This is cola, and Dumb Willie is an "advocate".
>

They're not interested in the facts - Dumb Willy is an advocate and that's 
all they need to know.

Not one of the "advocates" will question the bald faced lies from Dumb 
Willy.  But I'm sure we'll see a lot of the bottom feeders come along and 
leg-hump the liar with some "me too" posts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18281 — Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass

Am Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:19:22 -0400 schrieb Ezekiel:

> They're not interested in the facts - Dumb Willy is an advocate and
> that's all they need to know.
> 
> Not one of the "advocates" will question the bald faced lies from Dumb
> Willy.  But I'm sure we'll see a lot of the bottom feeders come along
> and leg-hump the liar with some "me too" posts.

What exactly do you expect? Since his claims have been disproven I don't 
see any reason why one should write once again that his claims are 
disproven.
Especially when the "anti-advocates" 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18286 — Re: Another lying piece of shit anti-linux troll Zeke froths.

Chris wrote:

> Am Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:19:22 -0400 schrieb Ezekiel:
>
>> They're not interested in the facts - Dumb Willy is an advocate and
>> that's all they need to know.
>> 
>> Not one of the "advocates" will question the bald faced lies from Dumb
>> Willy.  But I'm sure we'll see a lot of the bottom feeders come along
>> and leg-hump the liar with some "me too" posts.
>
> What exactly do you expect? Since his claims have been disproven I don't 
> see any reason why one should write once again that his claims are 
> disproven.
> Especially when the "anti-advocates" 

Subject says it all.

-- 
The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18308 — Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass

"William Poaster" <wp@induh-vidual.net> wrote in message 
news:lvrf88-aj7.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org...
> Chris wrote:
>
>> Am Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:19:22 -0400 schrieb Ezekiel:
>>
>>> They're not interested in the facts - Dumb Willy is an advocate and
>>> that's all they need to know.
>>>
>>> Not one of the "advocates" will question the bald faced lies from Dumb
>>> Willy.  But I'm sure we'll see a lot of the bottom feeders come along
>>> and leg-hump the liar with some "me too" posts.
>>
>> What exactly do you expect? Since his claims have been disproven I don't
>> see any reason why one should write once again that his claims are
>> disproven.
>> Especially when the "anti-advocates"
>
> Subject says it all.
>

Yes it does. It proves that you're a lying piece of shit who made up a claim 
that is completely false.

Changing the subject line doesn't change the fact that you're a piece of 
shit liar.


<quote>
> In their SEC filing M$ (guess)estimates Linux users at 10-12% & possibly
> as much as 14%, & warns that this can affect their business & drop in
> revenue.
>

Here's the official SEC filing Dumb Willy - where *exactly* does Microsoft 
say any such thing?

   http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/789019/000119312511026916/d8k.htm

</quote>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18337 — Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 07:55:50 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:

> "William Poaster" <wp@induh-vidual.net> wrote in message 
> news:lvrf88-aj7.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org...
>> Chris wrote:
>>
>>> Am Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:19:22 -0400 schrieb Ezekiel:
>>>
>>>> They're not interested in the facts - Dumb Willy is an advocate and
>>>> that's all they need to know.
>>>>
>>>> Not one of the "advocates" will question the bald faced lies from Dumb
>>>> Willy.  But I'm sure we'll see a lot of the bottom feeders come along
>>>> and leg-hump the liar with some "me too" posts.
>>>
>>> What exactly do you expect? Since his claims have been disproven I don't
>>> see any reason why one should write once again that his claims are
>>> disproven.
>>> Especially when the "anti-advocates"
>>
>> Subject says it all.
>>
> 
> Yes it does. It proves that you're a lying piece of shit who made up a claim 
> that is completely false.
> 
> Changing the subject line doesn't change the fact that you're a piece of 
> shit liar.
> 
> 
> <quote>
>> In their SEC filing M$ (guess)estimates Linux users at 10-12% & possibly
>> as much as 14%, & warns that this can affect their business & drop in
>> revenue.
>>
> 
> Here's the official SEC filing Dumb Willy - where *exactly* does Microsoft 
> say any such thing?
> 
>    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/789019/000119312511026916/d8k.htm
> 
> </quote>

William Poaster has been once again bitch slapped.

Maybe he can head over to the Ubuntu forums and fend off the tidal wave
of complaints that will surely begin later this week when "nappy headed
little boy" gets shat out of the Canonical rectum.


-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18331 — Re: Another lying piece of shit anti-linux troll Zeke froths.

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:37:25 +0100, William Poaster wrote:

> Chris wrote:
> 
>> Am Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:19:22 -0400 schrieb Ezekiel:
>>
>>> They're not interested in the facts - Dumb Willy is an advocate and
>>> that's all they need to know.
>>> 
>>> Not one of the "advocates" will question the bald faced lies from Dumb
>>> Willy.  But I'm sure we'll see a lot of the bottom feeders come along
>>> and leg-hump the liar with some "me too" posts.
>>
>> What exactly do you expect? Since his claims have been disproven I don't 
>> see any reason why one should write once again that his claims are 
>> disproven.
>> Especially when the "anti-advocates" 
> 
> Subject says it all.

Yea, but Zeke kicked your lying ass to the curb William Poaster.

So where is *your* proof of the SEC claims you make?

We are waiting.......


-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18282 — Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass

Am Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:19:22 -0400 schrieb Ezekiel:

> They're not interested in the facts - Dumb Willy is an advocate and
> that's all they need to know.
> 
> Not one of the "advocates" will question the bald faced lies from Dumb
> Willy.  But I'm sure we'll see a lot of the bottom feeders come along
> and leg-hump the liar with some "me too" posts.

What exactly do you expect? Since his claims have been disproven I don't 
see any reason why one should write once again that his claims are 
disproven.
Especially when the "anti-advocates" are so hostile to "me too" posts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18311 — Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass

"Chris" <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> wrote in message 
news:ip3a12$k7p$4@inf2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de...
> Am Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:19:22 -0400 schrieb Ezekiel:
>
>> They're not interested in the facts - Dumb Willy is an advocate and
>> that's all they need to know.
>>
>> Not one of the "advocates" will question the bald faced lies from Dumb
>> Willy.  But I'm sure we'll see a lot of the bottom feeders come along
>> and leg-hump the liar with some "me too" posts.
>
> What exactly do you expect? Since his claims have been disproven I don't
> see any reason why one should write once again that his claims are
> disproven.
>

Maybe Dumb Willy should at least make some pathetically weak effort to 
backup his claim: Where in the SEC does Microsoft actually say what the liar 
claimed?

<quote>
> In their SEC filing M$ (guess)estimates Linux users at 10-12% & possibly
> as much as 14%, & warns that this can affect their business & drop in
> revenue.
>

Here's the official SEC filing Dumb Willy - where *exactly* does Microsoft
say any such thing?

   http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/789019/000119312511026916/d8k.htm

</quote>



> Especially when the "anti-advocates" are so hostile to "me too" posts.
>

Because it's a sad joke when a bunch of idiots all line up and start doing a 
"me too" to something that is verifiably wrong.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18329 — Re: Another lying piece of shit "advocate" Dumb Willy pulls bullshit claims out of his ass

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 07:58:48 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:

> "Chris" <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> wrote in message 
> news:ip3a12$k7p$4@inf2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de...
>> Am Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:19:22 -0400 schrieb Ezekiel:
>>
>>> They're not interested in the facts - Dumb Willy is an advocate and
>>> that's all they need to know.
>>>
>>> Not one of the "advocates" will question the bald faced lies from Dumb
>>> Willy.  But I'm sure we'll see a lot of the bottom feeders come along
>>> and leg-hump the liar with some "me too" posts.
>>
>> What exactly do you expect? Since his claims have been disproven I don't
>> see any reason why one should write once again that his claims are
>> disproven.
>>
> 
> Maybe Dumb Willy should at least make some pathetically weak effort to 
> backup his claim: Where in the SEC does Microsoft actually say what the liar 
> claimed?
> 
> <quote>
>> In their SEC filing M$ (guess)estimates Linux users at 10-12% & possibly
>> as much as 14%, & warns that this can affect their business & drop in
>> revenue.
>>
> 
> Here's the official SEC filing Dumb Willy - where *exactly* does Microsoft
> say any such thing?
> 
>    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/789019/000119312511026916/d8k.htm
> 
> </quote>
> 
> 
> 
>> Especially when the "anti-advocates" are so hostile to "me too" posts.
>>
> 
> Because it's a sad joke when a bunch of idiots all line up and start doing a 
> "me too" to something that is verifiably wrong.

It's the COLA Linux advocate way.
What else can they do but LIE for LIEnux?

They certainly can't advocate Linux because once you get past the free
part, there is little else.

-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web