Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #32407 > unrolled thread
| Started by | flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-06-12 17:09 -0400 |
| Last post | 2011-06-13 05:47 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 170 — 29 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-12 17:09 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-12 17:59 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-12 18:01 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 05:48 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 08:27 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 10:34 +0100
[Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 06:37 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-06-13 06:50 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 12:18 +0100
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 13:41 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:41 +0100
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 10:18 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 12:29 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-13 18:09 +0000
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 15:40 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 14:54 -0500
Re: [Troll] "chrisv" and liarmutt leg humping each other. one reach around away from a happy ending. "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 15:59 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:27 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-14 17:00 -0700
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 12:33 +0100
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:20 -0500
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 09:42 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 16:18 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 13:07 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 13:18 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 19:23 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 20:17 +0200
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-13 15:41 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-06-13 12:47 -0700
Re: Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 12:53 -0700
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 14:50 -0500
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 15:51 -0400
Re: [Troll] Flounder, DFS, and "Hadron" creatin' dah Boom TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 23:50 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-13 19:24 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-13 15:02 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 12:39 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:04 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:24 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:42 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 13:57 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 15:01 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 14:12 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:30 -0500
Re: Time To flush the stupid turd "chrisv".. Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 09:44 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 06:20 -0700
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-13 16:01 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 13:02 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 23:45 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-13 23:22 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 01:29 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 02:45 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-14 06:50 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:13 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 11:08 +0200
[Troll] Imbecility and dishonesty incarnate Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 06:31 -0400
Re: [Troll] Imbecility and dishonesty incarnate William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 11:50 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 07:23 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 09:18 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 17:03 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 13:26 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 13:11 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 20:43 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:20 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-14 20:45 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 03:31 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-14 21:45 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-06-15 05:57 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-15 07:31 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 10:57 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 06:14 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:16 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 06:09 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 07:34 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:24 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 09:45 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 10:47 -0400
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:54 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 10:11 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 11:15 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:23 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:02 +0200
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-14 18:06 +0100
Re: Time To flush useless turd "Hadron" down the toilet. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:11 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turd "Hadron" down the toilet. "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 13:16 -0400
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 20:29 +0200
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:14 +0200
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-14 13:21 -0400
Re: Time To flush useless turd "chrisv" down the toilet. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 20:10 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 15:54 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 04:30 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 10:27 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-14 16:12 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:09 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 00:12 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:05 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:01 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:14 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:23 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-14 12:26 -0500
Re: Time To flush the "chrisv" turd... Hahahahha... "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> - 2011-06-14 13:38 -0400
Re: Time To flush the "chrisv" turd... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:48 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:19 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:34 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:53 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 20:14 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 12:33 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 17:13 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-15 11:59 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-15 20:33 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:37 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 00:04 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 18:11 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-16 00:12 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:32 -0700
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-16 09:07 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 10:27 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-16 11:21 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2011-06-16 17:54 +0200
[Troll] A dope with a rope Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-16 12:55 -0400
Re: [Chris Ahlstrom] A pussy with no balls "Barb Dwyer" <barb@invalid.com> - 2011-06-16 13:09 -0400
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-06-16 13:18 -0400
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-16 18:20 +0100
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-16 12:40 -0500
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope "Barb Dwyer" <barb@invalid.com> - 2011-06-16 14:02 -0400
Re: [Troll] A dope with a rope Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 19:56 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-16 14:30 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-17 07:26 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 01:33 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Bjørn Steensrud <bjornst+usenet@skogkatt.homelinux.org> - 2011-06-17 11:16 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 10:31 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-16 15:43 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2011-06-17 09:35 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-17 10:36 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-17 16:47 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 12:50 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-18 02:15 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-18 10:21 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-18 13:10 +0200
Time for some scripting! Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-18 06:59 -0400
Re: Time for some scripting! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-18 10:40 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:20 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 16:11 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 01:13 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-15 04:10 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 10:28 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 07:40 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... "Rick O'Shea" <rick@invalid.com> - 2011-06-15 09:22 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 15:29 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hardon <hardon.quirk@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 13:39 +0000
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-15 09:56 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-15 18:25 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-15 10:54 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 11:17 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-15 11:47 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 09:17 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:48 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 17:56 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 19:26 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:40 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-06-14 19:16 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 10:36 +0100
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:02 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 14:57 +0200
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:15 -0500
Re: Time To flush the useless asshole "chrisv"... Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 10:17 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 09:22 -0500
Re: Time To flush useless turds like "chrisv"... Hahahahha... "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> - 2011-06-13 10:48 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-13 12:19 -0400
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-13 08:16 -0500
Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Chris Ahlstrom... Hahahahha... Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 05:47 +0200
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 15:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <im1uyxq3zz.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #32516 |
White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> writes: > On 13/06/2011 13:42, Hadron wrote: > >> White Spirit<wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> writes: > >>> This is what you said: > >>> 'What IS a nightmare is when you start to run different curses type apps in he >>> terminal types and termcap issues start to crop up' > >> Curses type apps. Yes. And? Quite clear what this means in the >> context. > > It is quite clear that you don't know what you are talking about. No one who > has used the Curses library, or even knows what it is, would use it to refer to > a type of application in any circumstances. Seriously, are you insane? You dont understand what a curses type app is in the context of different terminal types and their termcaps? You're a fucking idiot : get some help.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | White Spirit <wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 14:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <it52cm$jgd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32520 |
On 13/06/2011 14:01, Hadron wrote: > White Spirit<wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> writes: >> It is quite clear that you don't know what you are talking about. No one who >> has used the Curses library, or even knows what it is, would use it to refer to >> a type of application in any circumstances. > Seriously, are you insane? > You dont understand what a curses type app is in the context of > different terminal types and their termcaps? I understand what you were trying to communicate but you obviously don't like the fact that I also understand that you don't know the difference between a library and a type of application. Referring to a 'curses type application' is ridiculous and no amount of pontification is going to make that go away. > You're a fucking idiot : get some help. Translation: Hadron is angry because his ignorance has been exposed once again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 08:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p44cv65nu1let39n1ipprot60619eohqki@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #32530 |
White Spirit wrote: >On 13/06/2011 14:01, Hadron wrote: > >> White Spirit<wspirit@homechoice.co.uk> writes: > >>> It is quite clear that you don't know what you are talking about. No one who >>> has used the Curses library, or even knows what it is, would use it to refer to >>> a type of application in any circumstances. > >> Seriously, are you insane? > >> You dont understand what a curses type app is in the context of >> different terminal types and their termcaps? > >I understand what you were trying to communicate but you obviously don't >like the fact that I also understand that you don't know the difference >between a library and a type of application. Referring to a 'curses >type application' is ridiculous and no amount of pontification is going >to make that go away. > >> You're a fucking idiot : get some help. > >Translation: Hadron is angry because his ignorance has been exposed once >again. In "Hadron" Quack's upside-down world, the person who is correct is the "insane idiot". -- "The Windows GUI is generally much more polished than Linux." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Pippa" <pippa@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 09:44 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Time To flush the stupid turd "chrisv".. Hahahahha... |
| Message-ID | <it547a$p7k$6@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #32541 |
rat asshole "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:p44cv65nu1let39n1ipprot60619eohqki@4ax.com... > > In "Hadron" Quack's upside-down world, the person who is correct is > the "insane idiot". another fine "advocacy" post from the dumbest piece of shit in the septic tank. "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a mentally ill piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 06:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8b77cef2-3499-45ea-bab0-788c258a6556@r35g2000prj.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #32499 |
On Jun 13, 6:24 am, White Spirit <wspi...@homechoice.co.uk> wrote: > On 13/06/2011 13:04, Hadron wrote: > > >> Let's not forget Hadron thinking that Curses is a type of application, not a > >> library. There is also his claim of being involved in kernel development, which > >> it turns out meant that he once submitted a bug report for something that was > >> not even kernel related IIRC. > > I know full well what curses is and programmed curses for VTs while you > > were still sucking on your dummy. Please find the link of me thinking > > curses is an "application". If I *did* I must have been incredibly > > drunk, or it was a typo, or the context is wrong. I suspect you're just > > telling lies. Again. > > This is what you said: > > 'What IS a nightmare is when you start to run different curses type apps > in he terminal types and termcap issues start to crop up' Whew! It's a good thing he listed the combo-pack of excuses for this one or he'd be SOL! He was obviously "incredibly drunk" ;) Gluey tries the combo-pack when cornered with his BS (to cover as many bases as he can). He's also used the "typo" bit ... but he'd keep using it even after reading a quote like you posted to Hadron showing it isn't a typo (proving that Snit has no idea what a typo is ). Another one Snit likes to pull... as I'm sure you've seen... is to cry foul on how old his lies are, as if they have an expiration date. Snit will insist on "proof" of my typo claim above... I once pointed out something Snit had written that I considered to be a freudian slip. Snit wrote: "Not only do I lie about what others are claiming, I show evidence from the records". When Snit saw me quote this he commented with: Quoting of a *obvious* typo that was quickly corrected. Me: "You call it a typo... I call it a freudian slip". http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2ce4f080e2d25a14?hl=en& For Snit's continuing education on the matter: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/typographical+error
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | High Plains Thumper <hpt@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 16:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <4df6182d$1@news.x-privat.org> |
| In reply to | #32535 |
Steve Carroll wrote: > I once pointed out something Snit had written that I considered to be a > freudian slip. Snit wrote: > > "Not only do I lie about what others are claiming, I show evidence from > the records". > > When Snit saw me quote this he commented with: Quoting of a *obvious* > typo that was quickly corrected. > > Me: "You call it a typo... I call it a freudian slip". > > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/ msg/2ce4f080e2d25a14?hl=en& > > For Snit's continuing education on the matter: > http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/typographical+error or this: Wally (CSMA): "Hey teacher! You do realize that you have just stated that High Plains Thumper is humiliated because he found a comment of yours to back up his accusations don't you! LOL ROTFLMAO! Seriously Snit are you ever going to be able put down in words what it is that you are actually trying so desperately to say? No! ...I doubt it too! :-)" 23 Jan 2009 http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/91aaecdbffb66ea3 -- HPT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 13:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <2rahc8-7lt.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #32482 |
In reply to White Spirit who posted: > On 13/06/2011 07:27, TomB wrote: > >> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: > >>> I would make bet that you would find more pro Linux and OSS posts from >>> me that can be verified compared to what Creepy has posted. > >> Yes, like when you said that Linus regrets licensing Linux under the >> GPL. > >> Or when you mentioned 'termcap' issues while termcap has been >> deprecated for years and replaced with terminfo. > >> Or when you said that a rogue ls script is bound to wreak havoc >> when a user has . on his path. > >> Or when you said that the Debian folks think that apt-get is crap, and >> mixing it with aptitude is guaranteed to cause major breakage - even >> in the repositories themselves! > >> Or when you said that even on GNU/Linux files are executable based on >> their extension. > >> And so on. > > Let's not forget Hadron thinking that Curses is a type of application, > not a library. And don't forget the 'fstab' thread, where a few Linux advocates tried to explain it to the dumbass, but he *still* didn't get it! > There is also his claim of being involved in kernel > development, which it turns out meant that he once submitted a bug > report for something that was not even kernel related IIRC. Not surprising. The "true linux advocate" & "kernel hacker" hasn't got a clue about building kernels. " I HAD to install testing Debian to get my HW to work." And someone posed the question: Uh, riiight. But didn't he claim to be a "kernel hacker"? So *why* didn't the troll get a newer kernel, & use that? What, it didn't occur to him? Or he doesn't know where to get a new kernel, or maybe he doesn't know what to do? Hadron: "I do. But I cant compile a kernel you twit if I cant install debian in the first place. Are you a total retard or what?" However, this trolling M$ zealot sometime later claimed (in another thread) that he had three or four Linux machines (IIRC), & just recently claimed that "I use Debian as mine simply using dual head nvidia but thats still controlled from my main development machines" so he couldn't compile a kernel on on one of those? Nah, the trolling f#ckwit isn't as clever as he thinks he is. As someone said to him in aolu "You woudn't know a Linux kernel if it shat in your mouth" Huh, these retarded idiots call me "Dumb Willy"! LMAO -- E Pluribus UNIX. "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 23:45 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20110613234202.242@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #32488 |
On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William Poaster: > > And don't forget the 'fstab' thread, where a few Linux advocates tried to > explain it to the dumbass, but he *still* didn't get it! Would you mind pointing me towards that 'fstab' thread? I can't imagine anyone not getting how fstab works or what it does. Well, except for Hadron that is, as he also had no clue that the periodic file system checks at boot time are not controlled by fstab. -- http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be When Chuck Norris does a pushup, he isn’t lifting himself up, he’s pushing the Earth down.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-13 23:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <37fic8-mfa.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #32712 |
In reply to TomB who posted: > On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William Poaster: >> >> And don't forget the 'fstab' thread, where a few Linux advocates tried to >> explain it to the dumbass, but he *still* didn't get it! > > Would you mind pointing me towards that 'fstab' thread? I can't > imagine anyone not getting how fstab works or what it does. > I don't have the Message-ID to hand (it was sometime around Dec 2008) but the trolling Hadron claimed he was very knowledgeable about fstab, & he kept asking Marti to explain it over, & over & over again. > Well, except for Hadron that is, as he also had no clue that the periodic > file system checks at boot time are not controlled by fstab. How about this! "You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk checks at system start in the fstab which can take hours to complete don't you?" Hadron - Message-ID: <ik8oi3$ojc$3@news.eternal-september.org> -- E Pluribus UNIX. "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 01:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20110614012010.103@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #32718 |
On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William Poaster: > In reply to TomB who posted: >> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >> Poaster: >>> >>> And don't forget the 'fstab' thread, where a few Linux advocates >>> tried to explain it to the dumbass, but he *still* didn't get it! >> >> Would you mind pointing me towards that 'fstab' thread? I can't >> imagine anyone not getting how fstab works or what it does. >> > I don't have the Message-ID to hand (it was sometime around Dec > 2008) but the trolling Hadron claimed he was very knowledgeable > about fstab, & he kept asking Marti to explain it over, & over & > over again. Too bad. I really would like to read what he had to say on the subject :-) >> Well, except for Hadron that is, as he also had no clue that the >> periodic file system checks at boot time are not controlled by >> fstab. > > How about this! "You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk > checks at system start in the fstab which can take hours to complete > don't you?" Hadron - Message-ID: > <ik8oi3$ojc$3@news.eternal-september.org> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls the order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will only trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. -- http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be When Chuck Norris falls in water, Chuck Norris doesn't get wet. Water gets Chuck Norris.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 02:45 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <it6auc$610$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #32727 |
On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: > On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William > Poaster: >> In reply to TomB who posted: >>> On 2011-06-13, the following emerged from the brain of William >>> Poaster: >>>> >>>> And don't forget the 'fstab' thread, where a few Linux advocates >>>> tried to explain it to the dumbass, but he *still* didn't get it! >>> >>> Would you mind pointing me towards that 'fstab' thread? I can't >>> imagine anyone not getting how fstab works or what it does. >>> >> I don't have the Message-ID to hand (it was sometime around Dec >> 2008) but the trolling Hadron claimed he was very knowledgeable >> about fstab,& he kept asking Marti to explain it over,& over& >> over again. > > Too bad. I really would like to read what he had to say on the subject > :-) I don't have a Message-ID ether, but I have a link to the treat in Google Groups: http://tinyurl.com/6bphv4x (Removed the full URL, coz I bet it looks horrible in slrn ;-) >>> Well, except for Hadron that is, as he also had no clue that the >>> periodic file system checks at boot time are not controlled by >>> fstab. >> >> How about this! "You do know a lot of distros set up auto disk >> checks at system start in the fstab which can take hours to complete >> don't you?" Hadron - Message-ID: >> <ik8oi3$ojc$3@news.eternal-september.org> > > Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and > which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the > tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls the > order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will only > trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their 2.2.x and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for what ever reason) manually create and initialize their file systems with mk2fs and mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies right over his head. -- |_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin, alias ML2MST |_|_|0| Registered GNU/Linux user 513040 |0|0|0| http://www.soundclick.com/martivanlin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 06:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnive15p.7pa.ZekeGregory@netscape.net> |
| In reply to | #32735 |
On 2011-06-14, Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: > On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >> >> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls the >> order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will only >> trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. > > "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their 2.2.x > and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for what ever > reason) manually create and initialize their file systems with mk2fs and > mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies right over his head. > Really? How else can you build a Gentoo system without manually creating and initializing your filesystems? -- Regards, Gregory. Gentoo Linux - Penguin Power
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 09:13 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <0q1uywvqam.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #32793 |
Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> writes: > On 2011-06-14, Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the Yes they can take ages. You are wrong. Why do you continue to make a fool of yourself by making silly claims that are easily disproven? >>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls the >>> order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will only >>> trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. What is your point exactly? You clearly dont understnd the issue and are making things up to big yourself up again. My POINT was that the check at sytem start can land you in the shit. AND you are WRONG. The defaults here are to check every N reboots. Your cluelessness seems to know no bounds. And for any lurkers go read here to realise TomB is either a fool, a liar or trolling:- known problems with sys start checks : http://nion.modprobe.de/blog/archives/507-Cancel-file-system-checks-during-boot-on-EXT32.html auto checks every N boots: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=300477 It includes how you can block the check using the FSTAB Right. Now thats TomB humiiated and proven to be telling lies once again. His problem is that he gets fixated on the trivia and it might well be possible I gabble on and mention the wrong config parm name or even forget I can use tune2fs but that doesnt change the overrakk issue, And the overrall issue here is quite clear. Other than TomB being made to look a fool once again. >> >> "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their 2.2.x >> and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for what ever >> reason) manually create and initialize their file systems with mk2fs and >> mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies right over his head. >> > > Really? How else can you build a Gentoo system without manually creating > and initializing your filesystems? Marti is talking rubbish and making things up again. As is tomb : who has become a totally dishonest bullshitter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 11:08 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20110614103504.176@usenet.drumscum.be> |
| In reply to | #32796 |
On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: > Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> writes: >> On 2011-06-14, Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the > > Yes they can take ages. No, they don't. A fairly loaded 1TB drive will take 15 minutes or so. Certainly not /hours/. > You are wrong. Why do you continue to make a > fool of yourself by making silly claims that are easily disproven? > >>>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls the >>>> order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will only >>>> trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. > > What is your point exactly? You clearly dont understnd the issue and are > making things up to big yourself up again. > > My POINT was that the check at sytem start can land you in the shit. > > AND you are WRONG. The defaults here are to check every N reboots. Never said otherwise. > Your cluelessness seems to know no bounds. > > And for any lurkers go read here to realise TomB is either a fool, a > liar or trolling:- > > known problems with sys start checks : > http://nion.modprobe.de/blog/archives/507-Cancel-file-system-checks-during-boot-on-EXT32.html > > auto checks every N boots: > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=300477 > > It includes how you can block the check using the FSTAB No, it doesn't. And rightly so, because you *cannot* disable the periodic file system checks with /etc/fstab. Those are controlled with the filesystem parameters and set with tune2fs, as explained in the very thread you're linking to. The fs_passnum field in /etc/fstab (the 6th field) is to set the order of the fsck run that occurs at *every boot*, and which will only trigger a full filesystem check on filesystems marked dirty. > Right. Now thats TomB humiiated and proven to be telling lies once > again. > > His problem is that he gets fixated on the trivia and it might well be > possible I gabble on and mention the wrong config parm name or even > forget I can use tune2fs but that doesnt change the overrakk issue, And > the overrall issue here is quite clear. Other than TomB being made to > look a fool once again. > >>> "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their 2.2.x >>> and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for what ever >>> reason) manually create and initialize their file systems with mk2fs and >>> mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies right over his head. >> >> Really? How else can you build a Gentoo system without manually creating >> and initializing your filesystems? > > Marti is talking rubbish and making things up again. > > As is tomb : who has become a totally dishonest bullshitter. -- http://twitter.com/drumscum | http://drumscum.be There's nothing more exhilarating than pointing out the shortcomings of others, is there? ~ Randal Graves
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 06:31 -0400 |
| Subject | [Troll] Imbecility and dishonesty incarnate |
| Message-ID | <it7deu$5f4$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32807 |
TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: > > No, it doesn't. And rightly so, because you *cannot* disable the > periodic file system checks with /etc/fstab. Those are controlled with > the filesystem parameters and set with tune2fs, as explained in the > very thread you're linking to. The fs_passnum field in /etc/fstab > (the 6th field) is to set the order of the fsck run that occurs at > *every boot*, and which will only trigger a full filesystem check on > filesystems marked dirty. > >> Right. Now thats TomB humiiated and proven to be telling lies once >> again. >> >>> Really? How else can you build a Gentoo system without manually creating >>> and initializing your filesystems? >> >> Marti is talking rubbish and making things up again. >> >> As is tomb : who has become a totally dishonest bullshitter. Said the totally dishonest bullshitter, "Hadron". The important question is, does Zeke approve of "Hadron"'s claims, and is "Hadron" getting his full measure of supportive rejoinders from his fellow newsgroup thugs? -- It's a poor workman who blames his tools.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 11:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [Troll] Imbecility and dishonesty incarnate |
| Message-ID | <p0rjc8-m6j.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> |
| In reply to | #32814 |
In reply to Chris Ahlstrom who posted: > TomB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: >> >> No, it doesn't. And rightly so, because you *cannot* disable the >> periodic file system checks with /etc/fstab. Those are controlled with >> the filesystem parameters and set with tune2fs, as explained in the >> very thread you're linking to. The fs_passnum field in /etc/fstab >> (the 6th field) is to set the order of the fsck run that occurs at >> *every boot*, and which will only trigger a full filesystem check on >> filesystems marked dirty. >> >>> Right. Now thats TomB humiiated and proven to be telling lies once >>> again. >>> >>>> Really? How else can you build a Gentoo system without manually creating >>>> and initializing your filesystems? >>> >>> Marti is talking rubbish and making things up again. >>> >>> As is tomb : who has become a totally dishonest bullshitter. > > Said the totally dishonest bullshitter, "Hadron". "Hadron, you are so full of shit I am amazed I can't smell you. You need to be on arrogant.assholes, not here." A.O.L.U. Message-ID: <cZ2Aj.8886$tW.8153@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com> > The important question is, does Zeke approve of "Hadron"'s claims, > and is "Hadron" getting his full measure of supportive rejoinders from his > fellow newsgroup thugs? Probably. -- "!sgub evah t'nseod CP sihT ?sgub naem ayaddahW" "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 07:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5akev693olneapcgde1tuo8dl5b0rk21tc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #32807 |
TomB wrote: > Hadron quacked: >> >> Yes they can take ages. Changing your story, Larry? >No, they don't. A fairly loaded 1TB drive will take 15 minutes or so. >Certainly not /hours/. > >> You are wrong. Why do you continue to make a >> fool of yourself by making silly claims that are easily disproven? Hahaha. What a clown you are, Larry. >> What is your point exactly? You clearly dont understnd the issue and are >> making things up to big yourself up again. >> >> My POINT was that the check at sytem start can land you in the shit. Nice FUD, "true Linux advocate". >> AND you are WRONG. The defaults here are to check every N reboots. Nice straw-man argument, Larry. >Never said otherwise. > >> Your cluelessness seems to know no bounds. Hahahaa How ironic. >> And for any lurkers go read here to realise TomB is either a fool, a >> liar or trolling:- Poor Larry. Are you hoping that no one actually reads what your links say? >> It includes how you can block the check using the FSTAB > >No, it doesn't. And rightly so, because you *cannot* disable the >periodic file system checks with /etc/fstab. Those are controlled with >the filesystem parameters and set with tune2fs, as explained in the >very thread you're linking to. The fs_passnum field in /etc/fstab >(the 6th field) is to set the order of the fsck run that occurs at >*every boot*, and which will only trigger a full filesystem check on >filesystems marked dirty. > >> Right. Now thats TomB humiiated and proven to be telling lies once >> again. There's Larry with his upside-down, wrong-is-right view of the word, again... Does he think that anyone would be fooled? >> As is tomb : who has become a totally dishonest bullshitter. Hahaha. Sure, Larry. You didn't just make a fscking jackass of yourself, AGAIN. -- "In the 90s multi head set up was very common place at home" - "Hadron"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Feudo Maccari" <feudo@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 09:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <it7n3q$82p$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #32822 |
stupid turd "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:5akev693olneapcgde1tuo8dl5b0rk21tc@4ax.com... > > Hahaha. Sure, Larry. You didn't just make a fscking jackass of > yourself, AGAIN. chrisv - the king turd of all jackasses everywhere. "chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 17:03 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <it7t7t$47a$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #32807 |
Op 14-06-11 11:08, TomB schreef: > On 2011-06-14, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron: >> Gregory Shearman<ZekeGregory@netscape.net> writes: >>> On 2011-06-14, Marti Van Lin<ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 14-06-11 01:29, TomB wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, that's the one. Classic. The checks he's talking about (and >>>>> which do /not/ take 'hours' by the way) are controlled with the >> >> Yes they can take ages. > > No, they don't. A fairly loaded 1TB drive will take 15 minutes or so. > Certainly not /hours/. > >> You are wrong. Why do you continue to make a >> fool of yourself by making silly claims that are easily disproven? >> >>>>> tune2fs command, not by fstab. The fstab fs_passno field controls the >>>>> order in which fsck checks the filesystems at boot time, and will only >>>>> trigger an actual check if a filesystem is marked dirty. >> >> What is your point exactly? You clearly dont understnd the issue and are >> making things up to big yourself up again. >> >> My POINT was that the check at sytem start can land you in the shit. >> >> AND you are WRONG. The defaults here are to check every N reboots. > > Never said otherwise. > >> Your cluelessness seems to know no bounds. >> >> And for any lurkers go read here to realise TomB is either a fool, a >> liar or trolling:- >> >> known problems with sys start checks : >> http://nion.modprobe.de/blog/archives/507-Cancel-file-system-checks-during-boot-on-EXT32.html >> >> auto checks every N boots: >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=300477 >> >> It includes how you can block the check using the FSTAB > > No, it doesn't. And rightly so, because you *cannot* disable the > periodic file system checks with /etc/fstab. Those are controlled with > the filesystem parameters and set with tune2fs, as explained in the > very thread you're linking to. The fs_passnum field in /etc/fstab > (the 6th field) is to set the order of the fsck run that occurs at > *every boot*, and which will only trigger a full filesystem check on > filesystems marked dirty. > >> Right. Now thats TomB humiiated and proven to be telling lies once >> again. >> >> His problem is that he gets fixated on the trivia and it might well be >> possible I gabble on and mention the wrong config parm name or even >> forget I can use tune2fs but that doesnt change the overrakk issue, And >> the overrall issue here is quite clear. Other than TomB being made to >> look a fool once again. >> >>>> "Hadron" also attacks people who reconfigured and compiled their 2.2.x >>>> and 2.4.x series kernels in the past, and those who (for what ever >>>> reason) manually create and initialize their file systems with mk2fs and >>>> mkswap / swapon, simply because it flies right over his head. >>> >>> Really? How else can you build a Gentoo system without manually creating >>> and initializing your filesystems? >> >> Marti is talking rubbish and making things up again. >> >> As is tomb : who has become a totally dishonest bullshitter. LOL, four more shameless lies from "Hadron" documented, for the record. I'm not talking rubbish, like I posted about two months ago, check out the Gentoo Handbook, which proves me right :-p Neither I'm making up things again. I posted a link to the treat where "Hadron" makes a fool out of himself once more regarding fstab, by exposing his incompetence and tried to cover it with insults (as usual). "Hadron" "ridiculed" me for describing how I used a Slackware 8.1 CD as a work around for the b0rk3d Puppy Linux install-script, a couple of years ago. I used cfdisk, mk2fs, mkswap and swapon. "Hadron" also totally freaked out, when I wrote that configuring and compiling Linux, is pretty easy (using Menuconfig or Xconfig) and that this was required some times in the heydays of Linux 2.2.x and 2.4.x. Tomb hasn't become dishonest nor a bullshitter. It was crystal clear, right from the start that Tommy is a polite and professional, knowledgeable Unix sysadmin. -- |_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin, alias ML2MST |_|_|0| Registered GNU/Linux user 513040 |0|0|0| http://www.soundclick.com/martivanlin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-14 13:26 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Time To Lower The Boom On Insulters |
| Message-ID | <it85oo$9mg$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #32872 |
Marti Van Lin wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > Tomb hasn't become dishonest nor a bullshitter. It was crystal clear, > right from the start that Tommy is a polite and professional, > knowledgeable Unix sysadmin. I agree heartily. Except he also has some knowledge of Windows, too. -- Illegal aliens have always been a problem in the United States. Ask any Indian. -- Robert Orben Immigration is the sincerest form of flattery. -- Jack Paar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web