Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #172271 > unrolled thread

Creepy or tomB can you please correct this site

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Creepy or tomB can you please correct this site Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2013-04-07 15:36 +0100
    Is it worth listening to opinions of low pay trolls 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-04-07 15:45 +0100
    Re: Creepy or tomB can you please correct this site TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2013-04-07 16:45 +0000
      Re: Creepy or tomB can you please correct this site Bjørn Steensrud <bjornst@skogkatt.homelinux.org> - 2013-04-08 09:11 +0200
        Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2013-04-08 06:09 -0400
          Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-08 08:00 -0500
            Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down Bjørn Steensrud <bjornst@skogkatt.homelinux.org> - 2013-04-08 20:20 +0200
              Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-08 14:16 -0500
          Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 02:43 +0100
            Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-09 14:04 -0400
            Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-09 14:27 -0400
              Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2013-04-09 20:57 +0200
                Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-09 15:09 -0400
                  Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2013-04-10 09:32 +0100
                    Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-10 10:39 -0400
                      Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-10 11:30 -0600
                Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-09 14:23 -0500
                  Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2013-04-09 16:15 -0400
                Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2013-04-09 16:14 -0400
        Re: Creepy or tomB can you please correct this site William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2013-04-08 12:33 +0100
    Re: Creepy or tomB can you please correct this site Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2013-04-07 17:14 -0400
      "Hadron"s reading/comprehension problem occurs again. William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2013-04-07 22:50 +0100

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#172271 — Creepy or tomB can you please correct this site

http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/HowToBuildInDebianFromSource

Very specifically "./configure". Please go tell them they're idiots and
dont understand Linux as well as you too do.

LOL!

And here

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6227875/what-are-various-options-arguments-for-configure-in-linux

and here

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8902698/linux-configure-make-prefix

etc etc

You really are idiots. It would have been so much easier to say "Hadron
is correct and thanks for pointing that out". But no. You play silly
games, waffle on about paths etc ALL things requiring you to be sure
whereas ./configure makes it explicit.

-- 
A certain COLA "advocate" faking his user-agent in order to pretend to be a Linux 
user: User-Agent: Outlook 5.5 (WinNT 5.0), User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0
(Linux), Message-ID: <wPGdnd3NnOM0ACfdRVn-hw@comcast.com>

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#172273 — Is it worth listening to opinions of low pay trolls

Hadron wrote:

> 
> h

Usenet online creeep Hadron issues orders.


Is it worth listening to opinions of low pay trolls
hired by 4th rate trolling companies any who?


Not anymore me thinks!




Trolling is an Industry in USA
------------------------------

Hiring low pay online trolls is ignorant.

Those hiring online trolls are too afraid to make a statement
in person in case their bollocks got cut off and sold
on ebay for 2 cents.

Most US politicians and businesses
are so corrupt and reliant to the point of addiction
on trolls and trolling and so they fund it all illegally
through charities because
funding through charities is untraceable
through loopholes in US law.

Nearly all foul mouthed trolling across all of usenet and forums
originates from the USA trolling industry.
The same ones screaming abuse against Americans 
are the same ones screaming abuse at the rest of the world.
The US politician is proud because without their
daily dose of illegal funding through charities, and the
services of industrial strength trolling machinery,
they would be out flipping burgers for a living.

Troll friendly usenet sites like eternal-september.org
banned by att.net, ameritech.net, bellsouth.net, pacbell.net
and prodigy.net for its foul mouth and lies over trolling
and off topic spammer friendly posting policies against 
the usenet charter of all known groups is where all of 
the trolling problems begins.

The US politicians, embassy staff and anyone else falling for it like 
Spanish government should know that the US trolls 
ordering embassies to this kind of work
have no mandate for these kinds of activities.

Just rich companies that have bank rolled teams of asstroturfers
to create fake support and certainly no mandate.
Companies like Eedleman also run fake survey companies
and delete everything except outlying data to fake their reports
to add legitimacy to their trolling campaigns.

The US trolling companies now set up branch offices
in foreign countries like Netherlands
and UK to post illegally and subversively what is 
handed down the chain of command leading all the way to
fake charities and marketing trolls 
shielded illegally behind big corporations in US.
Wikileaks tells us 5% of all US diplomatic activity is to
do with Appil and Micorshaft trolls and their 
trolling armies controlling US diplomatic services
at tax payer expense as their personal puppets.

There is NO MANDATE when fake asstroturfers are driving
the agenda.

The situation is so bad, it has spread into the military.
No one now knows who drives what agenda because
there is no traceability.

The fscking military, politicians, enviro nuts, music mafia,
using asstroturfing technology need the riot act read to them.

The situation is so incomprehensible that
the US has been declared falsely that it is the most charitable nation in
the world when at the same time 3 million US families
are living in shelter, and most of that charity money is fake
money being diverted from corporations into the coffers of asstroturfing
and PR companies. What would you do if you were 
forced into a shelter and all your charity
money was stolen from your charity?
You are down and they still want to steal YOUR CHARITY MONEY?!??
Thats right you would tell them NEVER and tell
them fsck off in no uncertain terms and get the law changed 
to make it a criminal offense to steal charity money
or spend it on anything other than 100% certified peer reviewed charity
without kickbacks, without creative accounting and
without morally unjust criminal behavior within
the charity system.

Most of the money funneled through
charities never make it to charitable causes in the USA.
It is stolen by politicians and pressure groups to cover
up their fake funding routes for asstroturfing.
They are used to it so we got to get over it?

No thanks!!!!

Not a single politician, embassy staff or military has a
mandate for one single political agenda because no one
knows who is funding who and who's agenda is real
and whose agenda is fake. Every signature collected
is one more fake signature for a mandate written out by
asstroturfers.

Asstroturfing through charities undermines society,
and all the nations dealing with US
and it must stop because no one in US has any legitimate
mandates for any of this activity any more.

If they have it, then should display their mandate
with pride, and show where the support had come from
and if any of it is through charities, then the
whole mandate is faked because charity status is being
abused to hide funding routes for corporate asstroturfing.



Asstroturfer offerings
----------------------


I've just read the contents of the fbo.gov solicitation RTB220610

The US government wants asstroturfers and with it sophisticated
asstroturfing technology to drown out democratic free speech,
and then hide from those whom it seeks to victimize.

It was point no.3 that caught my eye:
0003- Static IP Address Management

What that means is the same as what I've been saying for a while about 
doofi, flatcake and clog are true.

They are not individuals but a whole asstroturfing team
behind each sock puppet.

There isn't enough memory between the sock operators to know
or remember what had been said earlier so you know the
conversations are being typed out by multiple individuals
impersonating each other.
It was notable gaffs by the goofy doofy sock that first gave it away.

The asstroturfing teams had already gone into government and offered them
consulting services about what technology and asstroturfing
practices were out there for fbo.gov to decide what they will
purchase in solicitation RTB220610. Burson-Marstelar
won the contract performing all the activities
required in the solicitation with fantastic usenet software
tools for targeting individuals and trolling 24/7
and all built in outsourced India.


:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D 



https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=d88e9d660336be91552fe8c1a51bacb2&tab=core&_cview=1
 
Solicitation Number: RTB220610 
Notice Type: Sources Sought 
Synopsis: Added: 2010-06-22 13:42:52Jun 22, 2010 1:42 pm
Modified: 2010-06-22  14:07:11Jun 22, 2010 2:07 pmTrack Changes 

0001- Online Persona Management Service.

50 User Licenses, 10 Personas per user. Software will
allow 10 personas per user, replete with background,
history, supporting details, and cyber presences 
that are technically, culturally and geographically
consistent. Individual applications will enable an 
operator to exercise a number of different online 
persons from the same workstation and without fear
of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries.
Personas must be able to appear to originate in 
nearly any part of the world and can interact through
conventional online services and social media platforms.
The service includes a user friendly application 
environment to maximize the user's situational
awareness by displaying real-time local information. 

 
0002- Secure Virtual Private Network (VPN).

1 each VPN provides the ability for users to 
daily and automatically obtain 
randomly selected IP addresses through 
which they can access the internet. The daily 
rotation of the user s IP address prevents compromise 
during observation of likely or targeted web sites 
or services, while hiding the existence of the
operation. In addition, may provide traffic mixing, 
blending the user s traffic with traffic from multitudes
of users from outside the organization. This traffic 
blending provides excellent cover and powerful deniability.
Anonymizer Enterprise Chameleon or equal

 
0003- Static IP Address Management.


:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D 


50 each Licence protects the identity of government 
agencies and enterprise organizations. Enables organizations
to manage their persistent online personas by assigning
static IP addresses to each persona. Individuals
can perform static impersonations, which allow
them to look like the same person over time. Also allows
organizations that frequent same site/service often to
easily switch IP addresses to look like ordinary
users as opposed to one organization.
Anonymizer IP Mapper License or equal

:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D 

 
0004- Virtual Private Servers,

CONUS. 1 each Provides CONUS or OCONUS points of 
presence locations that are setup for each customer 
based on the geographic area of operations the 
customer is operating within and which allow a 
customer?s online persona(s) to appear to originate
from. Ability to provide virtual private servers that 
are procured using commercial hosting centers around 
the world and which are established anonymously. Once 
procured, the geosite is incorporated into the network 
and integrated within the customers environment and 
ready for use by the customer. Unless specifically 
designated as shared, locations are dedicated for use 
by each customer and never shared among other customers. 
Anonymizer Annual Dedicated CONUS Light Geosite or equal

 
0005- Virtual Private Servers, OCONUS.

8 Each Provides CONUS or OCONUS points of presence 
locations that are setup for each customer based on 
the geographic area of operations the customer is
operating within and which allow a customer?s 
online persona(s) to appear to
originate from. Ability to provide virtual private 
servers that are procured using commercial hosting 
centers around the world and which are established 
anonymously. Once procured, the geosite is incorporated 
into the network and integrated within the customers 
environment and ready for use by the customer. Unless 
specifically designated as shared, locations are dedicated 
for use by each customer and never shared among other 
customers. Anonymizer Annual Dedicated OCONUS Light 
Geosite or equal

 
0006- Remote Access Secure Virtual Private Network.

1 each Secure Operating Environment provides a reliable 
and protected computing environment from which to stage 
and conduct operations. Every session uses a clean 
Virtual Machine (VM) image. The solution is accessed 
through sets of Virtual Private Network (VPN) devices 
located at each Customer facility. The fully-managed 
VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) is an environment 
that allows users remote access from their desktop into 
a VM. Upon session termination, the VM is deleted and 
any virus, worm, or malicious software that the user 
inadvertently downloaded is destroyed. Anonymizer 
Virtual Desktop  Infrastructure (VDI) Solution or equal.


Contracting Office Address: 
 2606 Brown Pelican Ave.
 MacDill AFB, Florida 33621-5000 
 United States 
 Place of Performance: 
 Performance will be at MacDIll AFB, Kabul, Afghanistan and Baghdad, Iraq.
 MacDill AFB , Florida 33679 
 United States 
 
Primary Point of Contact.: 
 Russell Beasley,
 Contracting Officer
 russell.beasley-02@macdill.af.mil
 Phone: (813) 828-4729
 Fax: (813) 828-5111

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172304

On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>
> http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/HowToBuildInDebianFromSource
>
> Very specifically "./configure". Please go tell them they're idiots
> and dont understand Linux as well as you too do.

Hi Hadron,

	Thanks for digging up an old cow from the trench.
Unfortunately you fail to realize that I never said that "./configure"
is incorrect. I just noted - rather pedantically I must admid - that
saying something like

"run the ./configure script" (or something along those lines; I cannot
exactly recall)

is not an accurate way of putting it, because the dotslash is merely a
way to tell the shell you want it to look in the present working
directory. One would say (or write) "run the configure script", which
(usally) implies typing ./configure at the prompt.

On thing I never said, and never ever /will/ say, is that

$ ./configure
$ make
# make install

are bad instructions. Not at all even; they are - as we all know and
agree - the canonical instructions for installing a program from
source.

Can we move on now?

8<

-- 
Stupid men are often capable of things the clever would not
dare to contemplate...
	~ Terry Pratchett

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172413

TomB wrote:

> On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>
>> 
http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/HowToBuildInDebianFromSource
>>
>> Very specifically "./configure". Please go tell them they're idiots
>> and dont understand Linux as well as you too do.
> 
> Hi Hadron,

8<
 
> On thing I never said, and never ever /will/ say, is that
> 
> $ ./configure
> $ make
> # make install
> 
> are bad instructions. Not at all even; they are - as we all know and
> agree - the canonical instructions for installing a program from
> source.
> 
> Can we move on now?
> 
> 8<
> 

Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons seems 
to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that cluons 
can't get through at all.  He'll keep  harping on things he does not (and 
does not want to) understand.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172415 — Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

After swilling some grog, Bjørn Steensrud belched this bit o' wisdom:

> TomB wrote:
>
>> On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the "brain" of "Hadron":
>>>
>> Can we move on now?
>
> Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons seems 
> to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that cluons 
> can't get through at all.

LOL

-- 
Before each filming of Walker: Texas Ranger, Chuck Norris is injected
with fourteen times the lethal dose of elephant tranquilzer. This is, of
course, to limit his strength and mobility, in an attempt to lower the
fatality rate of the actors he fights. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172421 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Bjørn Steensrud belched:
>
>> TomB wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the "brain" of "Hadron":
>>>>
>>> Can we move on now?
>>
>> Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons seems 
>> to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that cluons 
>> can't get through at all.
>
>LOL

He's hoping that there is someone, someone, stupid enough to believe
his idiotic twist on things.

-- 
"I was told in answer number 1 that if I use GPL SW I must release my
source too."  -  Hadron Quark, lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172488 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

chrisv wrote:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> 
>> Bjørn Steensrud belched:
>>
>>> TomB wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the "brain" of "Hadron":
>>>>>
>>>> Can we move on now?
>>>
>>> Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons
>>> seems
>>> to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that
>>> cluons can't get through at all.
>>
>>LOL
> 
> He's hoping that there is someone, someone, stupid enough to believe
> his idiotic twist on things.
> 
Proverbs 1,22  :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172493 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

Bjørn Steensrud wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>> 
>>> Bjørn Steensrud belched:
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons
>>>> seems to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that
>>>> cluons can't get through at all.
>> 
>> He's hoping that there is someone, someone, stupid enough to believe
>> his idiotic twist on things.

I meant to write "someone, somewhere", there...
 
>Proverbs 1,22  :-)

"How long, O simple ones, will you love being simple?
How long will scoffers delight in their scoffing and fools hate
knowledge?"

Heh.

-- 
'Basically he's saying that just because everyone is running Windows
at work doesn't make it a "Windows shop."  It certainly isn't a "Linux
shop" and that's pretty much the definition of what a Windows shop
is.'  -  trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", lying shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172551 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:

> After swilling some grog, Bjørn Steensrud belched this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> TomB wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the "brain" of "Hadron":
>>>>
>>> Can we move on now?
>>
>> Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons seems 
>> to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that cluons 
>> can't get through at all.
>
> LOL

LOL. Creepy you're a grade A tit.

FACT : the build process is in 99% of the time

./configure

for a VERY good reason.

You and you windows using mates can argue all you like.

You're an idiot.


-- 
A certain COLA "advocate" faking his user-agent in order to pretend to be a Linux 
user: User-Agent: Outlook 5.5 (WinNT 5.0), User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0
(Linux), Message-ID: <wPGdnd3NnOM0ACfdRVn-hw@comcast.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172626 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

"Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:b01uakqy14.fsf@news.eternal-september.org...
> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
>
>> After swilling some grog, Bjørn Steensrud belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> TomB wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the "brain" of "Hadron":
>>>>>
>>>> Can we move on now?
>>>
>>> Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons 
>>> seems
>>> to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that 
>>> cluons
>>> can't get through at all.
>>
>> LOL
>
> LOL. Creepy you're a grade A tit.
>
> FACT : the build process is in 99% of the time
>
> ./configure
>
> for a VERY good reason.
>
> You and you windows using mates can argue all you like.
>
> You're an idiot.

Well he probably got a "me too" from Dumb Willy agreeing with him although 
that doesn't count because Dumb Willy will me too absolutely everything and 
anything. It's all he's capable of.

And a full-time Windows user like turdv probably gave Ahlstrom a "me too" as 
well so that's all Ahlstrom needs to convince himself that he's right. After 
all... turdv is so knowledgeable when it comes to computers. (LOL!)

-- 
>Problem with Chromebooks in the enterprise - when IBM, HP, eBay,
>Citi Bank, etc writes an email, internal document or spreadsheet
>they don't want Google to see each and every word they write?

Didn't think you had the brains that God gave a cockroach, fsckwit.

How about encrypting things that they don't want others to see?

turdv "thinks" that encryption will provide piracy on the docs you edit and 
spell-check online.
Jan 21, 2013
Message-ID: <gh8rf81ca9gjjjrt1pghah4tc41t41068l@4ax.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172631 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

"Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:b01uakqy14.fsf@news.eternal-september.org...
> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
>
>> After swilling some grog, Bjørn Steensrud belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> TomB wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the "brain" of "Hadron":
>>>>>
>>>> Can we move on now?
>>>
>>> Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons 
>>> seems
>>> to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that 
>>> cluons
>>> can't get through at all.
>>
>> LOL
>
> LOL. Creepy you're a grade A tit.
>
> FACT : the build process is in 99% of the time
>
> ./configure
>
> for a VERY good reason.

Oh yeah - I just downloaded the latest sqlite earlier today and built it 
from source. I followed the instructions in the INSTALL file which says:

<quote>
The simplest way to compile this package is:

  1. `cd' to the directory containing the package's source code and type
     `./configure' to configure the package for your system.  If you're
     using `csh' on an old version of System V, you might need to type
     `sh ./configure' instead to prevent `csh' from trying to execute
     `configure' itself.

  2. Type `make' to compile the package.
</quote>


> You and you windows using mates can argue all you like.
>
> You're an idiot.

Chris Ahlstrom doesn't know what to think and never has.  He relies on other 
people to post their opinion so that he can agree with them. He's never had 
an original thought of his own. Even his wife knows that which is why she 
treats him like the helpless child that he is.

-- 
"It's not so much the threat of divorce, as making your every moment at home 
a living hell. My wife used to dole out my weekly allowance, $20, and then 
quiz me about where I spent it, as she didn't expect me to buy snacks and 
such."

Chris Ahlstrom - emasculated wimp without a spine.

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ecaf21d667b4afca?hl=en

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172636 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

Ezekiel wrote:

> "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:b01uakqy14.fsf@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
>>
>>> After swilling some grog, Bj�rn Steensrud belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>>
>>>> TomB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the "brain" of "Hadron":
>>>>>>
>>>>> Can we move on now?
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons
>>>> seems
>>>> to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that
>>>> cluons
>>>> can't get through at all.
>>>
>>> LOL
>>
>> LOL. Creepy you're a grade A tit.
>>
>> FACT : the build process is in 99% of the time
>>
>> ./configure
>>
>> for a VERY good reason.
> 
> Oh yeah - I just downloaded the latest sqlite earlier today and built it
> from source. I followed the instructions in the INSTALL file which says:
> 
> <quote>
> The simplest way to compile this package is:
> 
>   1. `cd' to the directory containing the package's source code and type
>      `./configure' to configure the package for your system. 

Simple reason: The configure script resides in that directory, and linux is 
configured to not exec anything in the same directory without a path.
Makes one type of windows exploit a little harder to do

Note: that is a setup option which can be changed

> 
>   2. Type `make' to compile the package.

Again: Simple
"make" resides in a user accessible path and so needs no path to be found

> </quote>
> 
> 
>> You and you windows using mates can argue all you like.
>>
>> You're an idiot.
> 
> Chris Ahlstrom doesn't know what to think and never has.  

Wrong. You are talking about Hadron Msg-ID Larry here. He is the bullshitter 
who knows diddly squat about linux

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172637 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

"Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message 
news:kk1o69$8mu$1@dont-email.me...
> Ezekiel wrote:
>
>> "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:b01uakqy14.fsf@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
>>>
>>>> After swilling some grog, Bj?rn Steensrud belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>>>
>>>>> TomB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the "brain" of "Hadron":
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can we move on now?
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons
>>>>> seems
>>>>> to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that
>>>>> cluons
>>>>> can't get through at all.
>>>>
>>>> LOL
>>>
>>> LOL. Creepy you're a grade A tit.
>>>
>>> FACT : the build process is in 99% of the time
>>>
>>> ./configure
>>>
>>> for a VERY good reason.
>>
>> Oh yeah - I just downloaded the latest sqlite earlier today and built it
>> from source. I followed the instructions in the INSTALL file which says:
>>
>> <quote>
>> The simplest way to compile this package is:
>>
>>   1. `cd' to the directory containing the package's source code and type
>>      `./configure' to configure the package for your system.
>
> Simple reason: The configure script resides in that directory, and linux 
> is
> configured to not exec anything in the same directory without a path.
> Makes one type of windows exploit a little harder to do
>
> Note: that is a setup option which can be changed

I'm aware of how to configure and build sources. And yes, it can be changed 
but (most | all) defaults are not to execute from "." so the lowest common 
denominator and what's guaranteed to work even if "." is on the path is to 
explicitly put the current directory in front of the ./configure command.


>>
>>   2. Type `make' to compile the package.
>
> Again: Simple
> "make" resides in a user accessible path and so needs no path to be found

My make is in /usr/bin/make and if someone were to explictly try "./make" it 
simply wouldn't work since there's no make in the current directory. Unless 
of course some package came with it's own make which is extremely unlikely.


>> </quote>
>>
>>
>>> You and you windows using mates can argue all you like.
>>>
>>> You're an idiot.
>>
>> Chris Ahlstrom doesn't know what to think and never has.
>
> Wrong. You are talking about Hadron Msg-ID Larry here. He is the 
> bullshitter
> who knows diddly squat about linux
>

I've yet to see Chris Ahlstrom take a "stand" or "position" on anything. 
He's not any different than Dumb Willy. Look at Poaster's messages and more 
than 95% of them are "me too", "+1", "most definitely", "I agree" type 
posts. He's too stupid to have an original thought of his own.

Ahlstrom is no different. He has no thoughts or decisions of his own and 
isn't capable of taking any position other than to slurp and agree with 
something that somebody else has written.

Personally I'd rather be capable of thinking on my own even if that 
sometimes means having to be wrong. That's better than not ever having an 
original thought and going through life agreeing with everyone else.

-- 
"I have heard from a reliable source, inside Digidesign, that they actually 
have Protools running on Linux, and that the port from OSX isn't that hard, 
but are under contract obligation to Microsoft to not release a Linux port. 
Otherwise Microsoft can revoke their access to the Windows SDK."

Big bad Microsoft is going to "revoke their access to the SDK" even though 
the SDK is openly available from Amazon, Newegg, B&N, etc.
Message-ID: <4c763709$0$6277$6e1ede2f@read.cnntp.org>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172755 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> writes:

> "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message 
> news:kk1o69$8mu$1@dont-email.me...
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>> "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:b01uakqy14.fsf@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> After swilling some grog, Bj?rn Steensrud belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>>>>
>>>>>> TomB wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the "brain" of "Hadron":
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can we move on now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons
>>>>>> seems
>>>>>> to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that
>>>>>> cluons
>>>>>> can't get through at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>> LOL. Creepy you're a grade A tit.
>>>>
>>>> FACT : the build process is in 99% of the time
>>>>
>>>> ./configure
>>>>
>>>> for a VERY good reason.
>>>
>>> Oh yeah - I just downloaded the latest sqlite earlier today and built it
>>> from source. I followed the instructions in the INSTALL file which says:
>>>
>>> <quote>
>>> The simplest way to compile this package is:
>>>
>>>   1. `cd' to the directory containing the package's source code and type
>>>      `./configure' to configure the package for your system.
>>
>> Simple reason: The configure script resides in that directory, and linux 
>> is
>> configured to not exec anything in the same directory without a path.
>> Makes one type of windows exploit a little harder to do
>>
>> Note: that is a setup option which can be changed
>
> I'm aware of how to configure and build sources. And yes, it can be changed 
> but (most | all) defaults are not to execute from "." so the lowest common 
> denominator and what's guaranteed to work even if "." is on the path is to 
> explicitly put the current directory in front of the ./configure command.
>


Executing from "." on the path is absolutely retarded.

Pure and simple.

I'm beginning to wonder if Ahlstrom has ever used Linux never mind taken
the time to really understand the permissions system and best practices.

Once more : ./configure is the norm for a very good reason.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172776 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:32:20 +0100, Hadron wrote:


> I'm beginning to wonder if Ahlstrom has ever used Linux never mind taken
> the time to really understand the permissions system and best practices.

I've been wondering that for a while. He certainly doesn't seem to
know even the most basic concepts of Linux. It's likely he hasn't
been able to get Linux installed.


-- 
flatfish+++
PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172802 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

On 4/10/2013 8:39 AM, flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:32:20 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>
>
>> I'm beginning to wonder if Ahlstrom has ever used Linux never mind taken
>> the time to really understand the permissions system and best practices.
>
> I've been wondering that for a while. He certainly doesn't seem to
> know even the most basic concepts of Linux. It's likely he hasn't
> been able to get Linux installed.
>
>
Kohlturd, turdvs brother, has been striking out for quite a while now.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172640 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> Kreep wrote:
>>
>> Quack wrote:
>>>
>>> You're an idiot.
>> 
>> Chris Ahlstrom doesn't know what to think and never has.  

Very ironic, from you two fsckwits.  

Have either of you shitheads figured-out, yet, why it's not possible
to have too much choice in a free market?

Maybe you'd like your noses rubbed in an economics book, like was
recently done with other college textbooks.

>Wrong. You are talking about Hadron Msg-ID Larry here. He is the bullshitter 
>who knows diddly squat about linux

I think what reminded Larry of this issue is when I quoted him *lying*
about TomB and Chris A not knowing the difference between configure an
./configure.

'Course, "Ezekiel" pretends not to notice that his pal "Hadron" is a
bald-faced liar.

'Course, "Ezekiel" is a bald-faced liar himself.

-- 
'Once again it's the usual double-standard of a "linux advocate"'  -
trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", lying shamelessly (an advocate who
occasionally posted "long sigs" complained of someone posting in html)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172662 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

After swilling some grog, chrisv belched this bit o' wisdom:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
>> Kreep wrote:
>>>
>>> Quack wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You're an idiot.
>>> 
>>> Chris Ahlstrom doesn't know what to think and never has.  
>
> Very ironic, from you two fsckwits.  
>
> Have either of you shitheads figured-out, yet, why it's not possible
> to have too much choice in a free market?
>
> Maybe you'd like your noses rubbed in an economics book, like was
> recently done with other college textbooks.
>
>>Wrong. You are talking about Hadron Msg-ID Larry here. He is the bullshitter 
>>who knows diddly squat about linux
>
> I think what reminded Larry of this issue is when I quoted him *lying*
> about TomB and Chris A not knowing the difference between configure an
> ./configure.
>
> 'Course, "Ezekiel" pretends not to notice that his pal "Hadron" is a
> bald-faced liar.
>
> 'Course, "Ezekiel" is a bald-faced liar himself.

They're both nasty idiots.  Plain and simple.

-- 
The philosophy behind Free, Open Source Software has parallels in several
cultures which practice *ethical* co-operation. Perhaps that's why it threatens
*unethical* business practices which feed on the unknowing.
   -- Bassam A. Hassan -- CoFounder of the ILUG.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172661 — Re: Creepy "Hadron" still smarting from ./configure smack-down

After swilling some grog, Peter Köhlmann belched this bit o' wisdom:

> Ezekiel wrote:
>
>> "Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:b01uakqy14.fsf@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
>>>
>>>> After swilling some grog, Bj�rn Steensrud belched this bit o' wisdom:
>>>>
>>>>> TomB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the "brain" of "Hadron":
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can we move on now?
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons
>>>>> seems
>>>>> to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that
>>>>> cluons
>>>>> can't get through at all.
>>>>
>>>> LOL
>>>
>>> LOL. Creepy you're a grade A tit.
>>>
>>> FACT : the build process is in 99% of the time
>>>
>>> ./configure
>>>
>>> for a VERY good reason.
>> 
>> Oh yeah - I just downloaded the latest sqlite earlier today and built it
>> from source. I followed the instructions in the INSTALL file which says:
>> 
>> <quote>
>> The simplest way to compile this package is:
>> 
>>   1. `cd' to the directory containing the package's source code and type
>>      `./configure' to configure the package for your system. 
>
> Simple reason: The configure script resides in that directory, and linux is 
> configured to not exec anything in the same directory without a path.
> Makes one type of windows exploit a little harder to do
>
> Note: that is a setup option which can be changed
>
>>   2. Type `make' to compile the package.
>
> Again: Simple
> "make" resides in a user accessible path and so needs no path to be found
>
>> </quote>
>> 
>>> You and you windows using mates can argue all you like.
>>>
>>> You're an idiot.
>> 
>> Chris Ahlstrom doesn't know what to think and never has.  
>
> Wrong. You are talking about Hadron Msg-ID Larry here. He is the bullshitter 
> who knows diddly squat about linux

Zeke seems to think I'm arguing against that article.  I never have.
It describes the most common use case for the configure script.

I merely pointed out to "Hadron" that you can also do an "out-of-source"
compile by, for example, changing to a debug directory and doing a
"../configure --enable-debug", and that is just as STANDARD as doing
an in-source build.

But apparently Zeke is content to reflexively support another idiot.

Wottasurprise.

-- 
An 1994 New Yorker article about Microsoft relates "If he strongly disagrees
with what you're saying, [Gates] is in the habit of blurting out, 'That's the
stupidest fucking thing I've ever heard!'". Jennifer New, a former Microsoft
contractor, writes "Meetings with Bill or one of his top people are often
replete with a barrage of expletives and other disdainful comments."
   -- Salon, September 1997.  My friends who work or have worked at Microsoft
      tell similar tales. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#172416

Bjørn Steensrud wrote:

> TomB wrote:
>
>> On 2013-04-07, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>>
>>> 
> http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/HowToBuildInDebianFromSource
>>>
>>> Very specifically "./configure". Please go tell them they're idiots
>>> and dont understand Linux as well as you too do.
>> 
>> Hi Hadron,
>
> 8<
>  
>> On thing I never said, and never ever /will/ say, is that
>> 
>> $ ./configure
>> $ make
>> # make install
>> 
>> are bad instructions. Not at all even; they are - as we all know and
>> agree - the canonical instructions for installing a program from
>> source.
>> 
>> Can we move on now?
>> 
>> 8<
>> 
>
> Unfortunately - Hadron's collision cross-section with regard to cluons seems 
> to be zero. Either that, or he has such a massive bogon shield  that cluons 
> can't get through at all.  He'll keep  harping on things he does not (and 
> does not want to) understand.

LOL. How true.

-- 
A Windows user spends 1/3 of his life sleeping, 1/3 working, 1/3
waiting.

Micro$oft, the company that makes spreading malware easy. 

Microsoft exec Ron Markezich was quoted saying that for every $1 
companies spend on Microsoft software, they need to spend $6 getting 
it to work right. -- April 2011 SanFrancisco Chronical --

"We have no intention of shipping another bloated OS and shoving 
it down the throats of our users."
-- Paul Maritz, Microsoft group vice president --

What's bad about Micro$oft:
http://www.kmfms.com/whatsbad.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web