Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #412723

Re: Tiny "algorithm" challenge

Path csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail
From owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Tiny "algorithm" challenge
Date Wed, 3 May 2017 16:57:05 +0000 (UTC)
Organization O.W.L.
Lines 30
Message-ID <sav03.aby@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References <oeclh3$tll$4@dont-email.me> <xcv903.yyah@rooftop.invalid> <oecn7m$64a$2@dont-email.me> <f6e9f417-689d-4169-a71b-474249dafc6b@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host boom.rooftop.invalid
X-Face $BHf)vM$6p_?9L`jmOQ54JeNyL+%MZGGRfH8&grb[Y%-jU`MCPAQN=/SVDa{<KrBxl"%XcV >(/67bP(YB}rjV^h><g$kPGE_caHX,aa}4A1~sto7YJo#ob/SgNiMsoaMMXiOX9%DjyJM_-=$`F5b' JM,?/R/;V1RI%|eClL6ymI}LbZERB=q+"pJ)uI{ngj1DRF1;E5[r$f[4mgt9=7Pw@vl8@I%eYs6KWJ e%LU3#U@M[X^YBp2VY]-'1*reGDbk%#n1ve'*RffQ3j,(TCYivjb*M`qmuC5rHgbN)nSsx)697q/vt //''?=gM'C.salgG^f)>cUh
User-Agent tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64 (x86_64))
Xref csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:412723

Show key headers only | View raw


Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 1:54:03 PM UTC, DFS wrote:
>> On 5/3/2017 9:37 AM, owl wrote:
>> > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> >> * if the value entered on screen isn't a Sunday, get the date of the
>> >>    next/upcoming Sunday.
>> >>
>> >> My 1-line VB solution using immediate if:
>> >>
>> >> reportDt = IIf(Weekday(screenDt) > 1, screenDt + (7 - Weekday(screenDt)
>> >> + 1), screenDt)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The VB Weekday() function by default returns 1 for Sunday, 2 for Monday,
>> >> etc.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Beat it or be pwned.
>> > 
>> > anon@lowtide:~$ date -d Sunday
>> > Sun May  7 00:00:00 EDT 2017
>> > anon@lowtide:~$
>> 
>> 
>> That's not an algorithm; that's a cheat.
> 
> It's code reuse as is DFS' 'solution'.  Neither are a valid algorithm.

The algorithm was specified.  Those are implementations.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Tiny "algorithm" challenge DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-05-03 09:24 -0400
  Re: Tiny "algorithm" challenge owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-03 13:37 +0000
    Re: Tiny "algorithm" challenge DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-05-03 09:53 -0400
      Re: Tiny "algorithm" challenge owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-03 14:16 +0000
        Re: Tiny "algorithm" challenge chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-03 10:18 -0500
      Re: Tiny "algorithm" challenge Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 07:34 -0700
        Re: Tiny "algorithm" challenge DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-05-03 11:33 -0400
        Re: Tiny "algorithm" challenge owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-05-03 16:57 +0000
      Re: Tiny "algorithm" challenge Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-05-03 16:25 +0000
        Re: Tiny "algorithm" challenge DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-05-03 20:34 -0400
      Re: Tiny "algorithm" challenge Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 10:41 -0700

csiph-web