Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #708075
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: FOSS Supremacy -- Again! |
| Date | 2026-03-01 19:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n0jhe5Foi5fU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <189839a0d087abf0$1954$1715365$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <10o1tj8$dl1l$12@dont-email.me> |
On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 12:38:52 -0500, DFS wrote: > yt-dlp is public domain, so it doesn't pass the GuhNoo smell test. Actually, it is released under the Unlicense. https://unlicense.org/ What is funny is the Unlicense, by some arcane logic, is GPL compatible. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html "The Unlicense (#Unlicense) The Unlicense is a public domain dedication. A work released under the Unlicense is dedicated to the public domain to the fullest extent permitted by law, and also comes with an additional lax license that helps cover any cases where the dedication is inadequate. Both public domain works and the lax license provided by the Unlicense are compatible with the GNU GPL." The Unlicense doesn't exactly say 'Fuck you Stallman and your talmudic bullshit' but it comes close Why Use the Unlicense? Because you have more important things to do than enriching lawyers or imposing petty restrictions on users of your code. How often have you passed up on utilizing and contributing to a great software library just because its open source license was not compatible with your own preferred flavor of open source? How many precious hours of your life have you spent deliberating how to license your software or worrying about licensing compatibility with other software? You will never get those hours back, but here's your chance to start cutting your losses. Life's too short, let's get back to coding.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
FOSS Supremacy -- Again! Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-27 22:03 +0000
Re: FOSS Supremacy -- Again! "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-27 19:42 -0500
Re: FOSS Supremacy -- Again! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-02-28 02:23 +0000
Re: FOSS Supremacy -- Again! Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-02-28 11:52 +0000
Re: FOSS Supremacy -- Again! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-28 07:17 -0500
Re: FOSS Supremacy -- Again! Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-28 13:44 +0000
Re: FOSS Supremacy -- Again! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-28 10:43 -0500
Re: FOSS Supremacy -- Again! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-03-01 11:02 -0600
Re: FOSS Supremacy -- Again! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-03-01 13:07 -0500
Re: FOSS Supremacy -- Again! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-03-01 12:38 -0500
Re: FOSS Supremacy -- Again! rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-01 19:13 +0000
csiph-web