Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #687124
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing |
| Date | 2025-03-06 22:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m2ukciFc9d5U4@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <vq3kfi$17uke$3@dont-email.me> <xxixP.60075$Xq5f.22596@fx38.iad> <vq8s6f$2a88v$3@dont-email.me> <3xhyP.334524$2zn8.149692@fx15.iad> <vqd4cj$35294$5@dont-email.me> |
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 21:34:11 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 08:35:52 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> On 2025-03-05 1:49 a.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 08:55:40 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> Woke would be to ensure that everyone has the same computer today, >>>> regardless of whether they have the means to buy something better or >>>> not. In other words, both the rich and the poor would be running >>>> something like today's equivalent of a Commodore 64 with no option to >>>> increase RAM or add accessories. >>> >>> So a Commodore 64 is “woke”, but, say, an Apple Iphone is not? >> >> I didn't say that the Commodore 64 was woke ... > > But you did use it as an example of wokeness. > > Would an Apple Iphone be something that non-woke people might use? My ex has an iPhone. She definitely is not woke but has no interest in technology other than using it. I don't know why she selected it. Maybe her peers all had iPhones. Ironically she has a sophisticated blood glucose monitor and the app for it isn't available for the iPhone so she has to use a separate device.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-03-01 09:30 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-01 08:53 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-03 07:07 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-03 08:55 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-05 06:49 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-06 08:35 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-06 21:34 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-06 16:50 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-06 23:34 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-06 20:27 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-07 02:09 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-07 08:50 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-08 22:56 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-08 18:25 -0500
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-09 09:38 -0400
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-10 23:30 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-03-06 22:02 +0000
Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-06 10:55 -0500
csiph-web