Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #411334
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: sc stands for super computer |
| Date | 2017-04-25 15:29 +0000 |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Message-ID | <az89c002.av@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <ax0v03.ahu@rooftop.invalid> <727df8c6-eee7-4c12-a260-9cf4e82de997@googlegroups.com> <47qdnX9xU4bLA2PFnZ2dnUU7-XnNnZ2d@giganews.com> <sz00b.3vy45@rooftop.invalid> <gp6dndVpIajRNmPFnZ2dnUU7-TvNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > On 2017-04-25, owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> On 2017-04-25, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> // snip >>> >>>> Thanks for the effort. Not a big deal as the post was just me pointing >>>> out how Apple dumping Automator would piss some people off but, >>>> in the grand scheme of things, it wasn't going to affect the "average" >>>> user much. >>> >>> Apple abandoning something?? No way... ;) >>> >> >> They have to clear a path for maciOS. > > Actually, they don't. iOS and MacOS will never intersect. I don't see a convergence of OSes. I do think that macOS will go away and iOS will be wedged onto the Macks as maciOS. > Now if they just > gave the Mac a touch screen, a pen and a cellular modem, they'd have > something. Instead of running an ARM processor to manage the touch bar > that ARM processor should be monitoring events such as a text message or > a phone call. If they did that with MacOS such that it could stay on all > the time like the iPad can stay on all the time, they'd really have > something there. > > I have an iPad and an iPhone. There are two things I like about both. > I never turn them off. They iPad will make a noise and alert me when I > get an email. I can leave it in my pack 24 hours a day, seven days week > and if I don't turn the display on to actually use it, the battery is > hardly touched at all. It will only lose a few percent of power per day. > The events are monitors while the CPU is in a very low usage mode. It's > pretty much asleep, but still gets events. You put that kind of function > into a laptop, and you got me sold. > > ARM is really on to something here. Thanks to the hundreds of millions > of these sold per quarter they keep getting faster and faster while > giving better and better battery life. They are very dynamic in terms of > CPUs cores being active or not, and being used or shut down to save > power. > > In my opinion the next great feature for the PC is the monitoring of > events in real time. Always on, always monitoring. My laptop should get > smaller, lighter and yet always be on and always be monitoring. > > One nice thing about the phone is that we decided it is a phone. We > decided it is a communications device. Now we have to allow the PC to > *also* become a communications device. That means each PC needs > something like a text message capability and an assumed method of > reaching the user on the device. If you like, have two sides to the same > device. An ARM CPU for events and an Intel CPU for the muscle. But the > laptop needs to be on all the time. > > And iPad with a keyboard pretends to be this but it's missing the > functionality of a PC. The PC has the functionality of a PC, but isn't a > communications device at its soul the way a smart phone is. I can't > leave the laptop on 24 x 7 from battery only. With the iPad I only > top it off once ever two or three days and otherwise, it is not plugged > in at all. I assume it is not dead because it takes days to kill it with > my usage. I don't use it like a PC because it lacks the functions of a > PC. It sits in my backpack most of the time, powered on and waiting for > me to need it. I still hear it alerting me to events though. I like that > part about it. > I think improving the computing experience for mobile devices, with a more capable OS, along with modular accessories like keyboard and portable monitor will be the way it goes.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-23 13:57 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-24 13:45 -0400
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 10:51 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-25 13:49 -0400
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 10:56 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-26 08:38 -0400
Re: sc stands for super computer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-25 18:07 +0000
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 11:41 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-25 19:11 -0400
Re: sc stands for super computer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-26 06:35 -0500
Re: sc stands for super computer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-26 07:32 -0400
Re: sc stands for super computer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-26 09:09 -0400
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-24 11:01 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 11:49 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-24 14:40 -0500
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-24 12:50 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> - 2017-04-24 19:51 +0000
Re: sc stands for super computer Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-24 14:58 -0500
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 13:52 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-24 16:21 -0500
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-24 14:34 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 14:56 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-24 17:03 -0500
Re: sc stands for super computer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-24 22:09 +0000
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 15:53 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-24 23:07 +0000
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 16:24 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-24 23:35 +0000
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 16:46 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-24 23:51 +0000
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 17:37 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-24 19:54 -0500
Re: sc stands for super computer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-25 01:07 +0000
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-24 18:41 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-24 20:50 -0500
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-24 19:00 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-25 15:29 +0000
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 08:53 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-25 11:17 -0500
Re: sc stands for super computer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-25 16:24 +0000
Re: sc stands for super computer Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-25 11:33 -0500
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 12:03 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 09:37 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 12:05 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 12:07 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-24 18:41 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-25 08:24 -0400
Re: sc stands for super computer Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-25 10:03 -0500
Re: sc stands for super computer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-25 10:15 -0500
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 13:25 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-25 12:35 -0400
Re: sc stands for super computer =?iso-8859-1?Q?=E5=90=8D=E8=AA=89=E6=AF=80=E6=90=8D=E3=81=AE=E3=81=9F=E3=8 <invalid@gmail.invalid> - 2017-04-25 19:06 +0200
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 09:20 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-25 09:23 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-24 22:30 +0000
Re: sc stands for super computer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-24 14:25 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer fr314159@gmail.com - 2017-04-24 12:24 -0700
Re: sc stands for super computer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-24 16:41 -0400
Re: sc stands for super computer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 14:13 -0700
csiph-web