Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #412110
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites |
| Date | Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:37:45 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Lines | 49 |
| Message-ID | <ac903.a3yy@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <oe4ucf22eek@news4.newsguy.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | boom.rooftop.invalid |
| X-Face | $BHf)vM$6p_?9L`jmOQ54JeNyL+%MZGGRfH8&grb[Y%-jU`MCPAQN=/SVDa{<KrBxl"%XcV >(/67bP(YB}rjV^h><g$kPGE_caHX,aa}4A1~sto7YJo#ob/SgNiMsoaMMXiOX9%DjyJM_-=$`F5b' JM,?/R/;V1RI%|eClL6ymI}LbZERB=q+"pJ)uI{ngj1DRF1;E5[r$f[4mgt9=7Pw@vl8@I%eYs6KWJ e%LU3#U@M[X^YBp2VY]-'1*reGDbk%#n1ve'*RffQ3j,(TCYivjb*M`qmuC5rHgbN)nSsx)697q/vt //''?=gM'C.salgG^f)>cUh |
| User-Agent | tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64 (x86_64)) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:412110 |
Show key headers only | View raw
F. Russell <fr@random.info> wrote: > Consider these two web sites: > > 1) http://www.3dconnexion.com > > 2) http://www.fentek-ind.com > > Which one is superior? > > Unless you have chosen #2 as your answer, then you are most > likely a Mint/Ubuntu using idiot and prisoner of fashion. > > Site #2 is simple and straightforward and packed with information > to allow the viewer to quickly gain an appreciation of the comprehensive > offerings. (It could use better colors, though.) > > Site #1 is sparse and loaded only with shiny gimmickry that does > manage to grab the viewer's attention but offers little in the > way of hard information. > > Site #2 is durable and timeless. It will still be viable and effective > twenty years from now. > > site #1 represents the current "fly by fashion" template style that > will be obsolete and even shameful before the end of next year. > > Site #2 has NO JAVASCRIPT and operates very quickly. I can view > it in the graphical links browser without incurring distortion. > > Site #1 is laden with massive javascript and is relatively sluggish. > It cannot be viewed in the graphical links browser without destroying > the junk layout. > > I hereby award site #2 the highest honors and accolades. Great job! > > I hereby spit and piss on site #1 for being of less substance > than a pig fart. GTFO! > > Postscript: > > Site #2 obviously used the dumb-fuck stooge (DFS) as a model > on the "Foot Pedals and Foot Switches" page. Only he would > wear shoes (and pants) like that. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! > I purchased a device from site 1 yesterday. I showed you a device on site 2 yesterday that met your specs. Did you buy it?
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A Tale of Two Web Sites "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-04-30 15:03 +0000
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-30 10:10 -0500
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 08:52 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-30 15:53 +0000
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-30 11:43 -0500
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 09:54 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 18:47 +0000
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:07 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-04-30 19:17 +0000
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:26 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-30 15:37 +0000
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-04-30 17:03 +0000
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-30 17:11 +0000
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:07 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:13 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 08:42 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-30 15:39 -0400
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 13:06 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-04-30 21:50 +0000
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 15:28 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-04-30 22:47 +0000
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 16:16 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 16:27 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-05-01 09:29 +0000
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-05-01 12:15 +0200
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 07:13 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites fr314159@gmail.com - 2017-05-01 07:57 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 08:14 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-05-01 15:04 -0400
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 12:31 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 16:27 -0700
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-05-01 18:14 -0400
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-30 14:15 -0400
Re: A Tale of Two Web Sites Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-30 12:11 -0700
csiph-web