Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #641350
| From | "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.18--1.20pm.Seattle.2023> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <uj70dn$2lo74$2@dont-email.me> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.17--0.33am.Seattle.2023> <uj94ue$31ed3$1@dont-email.me> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.17--8.22pm.Seattle.2023> <ujas89$3c9j1$3@dont-email.me> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Scott vs Relf |
| Organization | usenet-news.net |
| Date | 2023-11-18 13:20 -0800 |
1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 c5 3. e3 Nf6 4. Bb5+ Bd7 5. Qe2 Nc6 6. Nf3 e6
7. O-O a6 8. Bd3 c4 9. Ng5 h6 10. Nxf7 cxd3 11. Qxd3 Kxf7
r q b r 8
p b k p 7
p n p n p 6
p 5
P 4
N Q P 3
P P P P P P 2
R B R K 1
a b c d e f g h
StockFish acts like it's "been there and done that" ( because it has );
it takes less than a second to reveal the best move . . .
so why heat up the room ?! 17 additional minutes of analysis won't change its answer.
> Though _LLMs_ can't play chess, there is apparently
> a way to use neural nets to train chess computers ? Interesting.
Yes, it's the _Only_ way that StockFish knows to score something.
2013, a then 33 year old Gary Linscott, in Seattle,
now the Principal Software Engineer at Amazon's Zoox ( self driving vehicles )
devised StockFish's system for deciding whether a change to
the neural network would be beneficial or not.
All that testing, tens of thousands of volunteer PCs
( plenty of carbon emissions ), makes it so that
there's nothing left to analyze when playtime arrives.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: d5 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-14 00:21 +0000
Scott vs Relf "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-13 17:07 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-14 01:57 +0000
Re: Scott vs Relf % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2023-11-13 19:02 -0700
Scott vs Relf "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-13 19:43 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2023-11-13 20:49 -0700
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-14 04:49 +0000
Scott vs Relf "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-13 22:09 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-15 03:31 +0000
Scott vs Relf "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-14 20:15 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-15 04:24 +0000
Scott vs Relf "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-14 21:01 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-15 06:53 +0000
Scott vs Relf "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-14 23:36 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> - 2023-11-15 09:42 -0600
Re: Scott vs Relf % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2023-11-15 09:49 -0700
Re: Scott vs Relf candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> - 2023-11-15 11:20 -0600
Scott has more "compute". "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-15 13:50 -0800
Scott forgets if it's his turn or not. "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-15 14:11 -0800
Re: Scott has more "compute". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-16 04:00 +0000
Re: Scott has more "compute". % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2023-11-15 21:12 -0700
Have you memorized the ECO ? "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-15 20:23 -0800
Your move (was: Re: Have you memorized the ECO ?) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-16 04:29 +0000
Scott vs Relf "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-15 21:20 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-16 05:56 +0000
Scott vs Relf "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-16 00:06 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-17 06:08 +0000
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-17 06:15 +0000
Scott vs Relf "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-17 00:33 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-18 01:44 +0000
Scott vs Relf "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-17 20:22 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-18 17:28 +0000
Scott vs Relf "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-18 13:20 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> - 2023-11-18 22:58 -0600
Chess has too many "unknown unknowns". "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-18 21:25 -0800
The game of chess has been solved. "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-20 00:34 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-22 18:27 +0000
There are but a few, finite, ways to succeed. "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-22 17:57 -0800
Game 2. "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-23 09:52 -0800
When StockFish plays its 2nd best move. "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-24 01:35 -0800
The most satisfying way to beat StockFish. "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-25 06:15 -0800
Re: Scott vs Relf Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2023-11-18 10:31 +0000
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-18 17:40 +0000
Re: Scott vs Relf Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2023-11-18 18:11 +0000
Re: Scott vs Relf candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> - 2023-11-18 23:06 -0600
Re: Scott vs Relf RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> - 2023-11-16 07:49 -0500
Re: Scott vs Relf vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-16 04:21 +0000
I refuse to memorize chess games; I truly suck. "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-15 20:36 -0800
Re: I refuse to memorize chess games; I truly suck. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-16 05:27 +0000
How many CPUs and/or threads could you muster into a chess engine, I wonder. "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-15 21:37 -0800
Re: How many CPUs and/or threads could you muster into a chess engine, I wonder. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2023-11-16 06:18 +0000
How many CPUs and/or threads could you muster into a chess engine ? "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2023-11-16 00:07 -0800
Re: I refuse to memorize chess games; I truly suck. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2023-11-16 09:26 -0500
csiph-web