Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #412730

Re: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03
Date	2017-05-03 10:10 -0700
Message-ID	<D52F5D09.A348D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(14 earlier) <D52E29DA.A3224%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yzmnuao9js98qf@red.lan> <D52E432C.A3254%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <sandman-194a74971eb73d7e8c00cabe9e3f4b48@individual.net> <oeclhs$tll$5@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/3/17, 6:24 AM, in article oeclhs$tll$5@dont-email.me, "DFS"
<nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

> On 5/3/2017 3:01 AM, Sandman wrote:
> 
>> [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/j5vqmx4)
> 
> Your English is good, but there are a few errors in here:
> 
> "A common troll trait is to dig up arguments from the past and try to
> focus on them instead of the current issue. This technique is used to
> try to sidestep a current argument or to insult a poster when the troll
> feels cornered. A good example would be for the troll to claim that the
> opponent is ignorant because he or she couldn't do this or that, based
> on the earlier issue, trying to draw focus on an alledged flaw from the
> past to diminish the opponents credibility in this issue.  For some
> trolls, this also sparks an opportunity to create new Antagonizing
> threads based on these earlier issues.  This is also in clear violation
> with point four fo the Code of Honesty"
> 
> alledged = alleged    (obsolete spelling)
> opponents = opponent's  (apostrophe to indicate possession)
> violation with = violation of
> fo = of  (typo)
> 

His logic is FAR worse than his English.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-02 20:04 +0100
  Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 12:19 -0700
    Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net> - 2017-05-02 15:51 -0400
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-02 21:07 +0100
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 13:59 -0700
    Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-02 21:14 +0100
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 14:07 -0700
        Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 01:07 +0100
          Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 18:54 -0700
            Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 15:38 +0100
              Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 10:02 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-03 16:22 -0400
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 13:40 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-03 17:01 -0400
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 14:25 -0700
        Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-05-03 07:01 +0000
          Re: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 10:46 +0100
            Re: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 10:09 -0700
              Snit digest 436 / 2017-05-04 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-05-03 22:06 +0000
                Re: Snit digest 436 / 2017-05-04 "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 23:16 +0100
                Re: Snit digest 436 / 2017-05-04 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 15:21 -0700
                Re: Snit digest 436 / 2017-05-04 "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 00:19 +0100
                Re: Snit digest 436 / 2017-05-04 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 16:46 -0700
          Re: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-05-03 09:24 -0400
            Re: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 10:10 -0700

csiph-web