Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #403946

Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ?

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	alt.checkmate, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ?
Date	2017-03-27 14:35 -0700
Message-ID	<D4FED3AB.985F1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(11 earlier) <ejrgf3F1l31U2@mid.individual.net> <0inidclq943buq738tmm69c9a6mbi8ne3q@4ax.com> <ejt846Fd713U1@mid.individual.net> <NJeCA.2$_q7.0@fx01.iad> <ejte34Fd713U5@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/27/17, 2:21 PM, in article ejte34Fd713U5@mid.individual.net, "vallor"
<vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:37:00 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote:
>  
>>> I made no such "attempt", but I understand your snittish need to try to
>>> deflect my slam-dunk argument.
>>> 
>>> Furthermore, this was a discussion about depriving U.S. citizens of
>>> their God-given rights because of your Islamophobia.
>> 
>> There is no such thing as Islamophobia. It is a term created by Muslim
>> leaders themselves to freely use as an attack against anyone who
>> criticizes their anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, anti-Western agenda. It
>> was meant to paint any of their adversaries as racists and only the
>> dumbest were supposed to fall for it. Unfortunately, there's plenty of
>> liberals and they're the dumbest in every way. Everyone is so scared of
>> being labeled a racist so they fall in line and accept terrorism, no-go
>> zones and the bastardization of existing law into something that is more
>> sharia-compliant. It's too bad that people like you are such fucking
>> cowards that you'd rather try and ally with the people who will
>> eventually behead your ass than try to resist them. You are a _coward_
>> Scott Doty. A true _COWARD_.
> 
> Oh no, I'm being called a "coward" by a neo-nazi snowflake because of his
> own idiotic strawman reasons!  Whatever will I do, now that I've lost the
> respect of a genocidal maniac?
> 
> You're an ignorant clown, "Slimer", and someone who actually took you
> seriously would go dig up your name right now (since you have posted it
> to COLA...remember?) and point out to your institution what a neo-nazi
> fuckwit you actually are.

While I would not back this in any way, and openly ask people to NOT do
this, I would have little sympathy if someone did. Slimer is back to seeding
Google with one of my business names and his insults, attacks, and lies.

He is doing something very much akin to what you speak of here.

> Included in that would be the evidence of you
> twitter-stalking at least one former student, as well as other assorted
> unsavory habits of yours.
> 
> But I don't believe in depriving someone of their livelyhoood because
> they got emotional on the USENET.  Better to hold you up as an example of
> what a radicalized Unabomber-sympathizer looks like.
> 
> And regarding your charge of "coward"?  Your continued use of my name
> when I chose to remain pseudonymous only illustrates just how powerless
> you feel,

Ah, so he is doing the same to you. Lovely. Yes, it is a very cowardly move
on his part and while I STILL would not approve of anyone doing as you speak
of he is actively and currently inviting such behavior. It is a very, very
poor choice on his part.

> and how you would _cowardly_ lash out with such attempts at
> intimidation.  And I don't care if you recognize that or not, because you
> have already displayed it here, for everyone to see.
> 
> You're sunk, nazi.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:25 -0400
  Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:45 -0700
    Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:12 -0400
      Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:34 -0700
      Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:27 -0700
        Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Kachina Dancer <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-25 23:45 -0700
          Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 23:52 -0700
            Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:43 -0400
              Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:01 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:52 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:12 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-26 22:50 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 08:22 -0400
  Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-26 03:36 +0200
    Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:47 -0400
      Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:02 -0700
        Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:12 -0400
          Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-26 08:35 -0500
          Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:04 -0700
            Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:53 -0400
              Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:56 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:07 -0700
              Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:13 -0700
              Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-26 23:17 +0000
              Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:02 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 20:44 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:56 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 21:10 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:44 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:54 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:04 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:04 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:50 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:47 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:58 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
                Kids today make Jesus look like Trump. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2017-03-26 20:21 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 08:17 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 10:36 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:08 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom, WoD #1) - 2017-03-27 10:07 +0100
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:43 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:38 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:47 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:55 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 23:09 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:23 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:43 -0700
                Both Michael Glasser and CaptainPissBucket have OCD, bad. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2017-03-26 20:28 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:22 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:02 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:45 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 16:00 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:21 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:42 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:17 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-28 00:31 +0200
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:31 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 15:35 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:50 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:12 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:54 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 14:58 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:43 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:58 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:24 -0700
                Men were _not created equally. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2017-03-27 20:51 -0700
                Re: Men were _not created equally. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:44 -0400
                Re: Men were _not created equally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:12 -0700
                Re: Men were _not created equally. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-28 22:14 -0500
                Re: Men were _not created equally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 20:15 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:27 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:07 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 20:39 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:53 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:05 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 21:15 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:27 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:30 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:28 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:37 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 19:42 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 11:05 -0700
                Trump is more "golden calf" than Christian. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2017-03-27 21:12 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:37 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 13:47 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-28 01:56 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 03:49 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:59 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 06:17 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 14:52 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:28 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:34 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:47 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 19:39 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:48 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 20:38 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:37 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:58 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 21:21 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:46 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 16:55 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:35 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:01 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-27 16:16 -0600
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:49 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:20 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:22 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:50 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:15 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-29 10:10 -0500
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 01:11 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 01:13 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:25 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:45 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:56 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:17 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.orq> - 2017-03-26 22:26 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:28 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@qmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:32 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:37 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:26 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 02:48 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:53 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-27 07:22 -0500
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:37 -0700

csiph-web