Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #172674

Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk
Date 2013-04-09 13:49 -0700
Message-ID <CD89CCDF.18CFD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References <c59ad337-2ef9-46ef-b9ef-c3fd27fb69b2@k6g2000pbq.googlegroups.com> <kk1ksp$cs7$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/9/13 11:01 AM, in article kk1ksp$cs7$1@dont-email.me, "Ezekiel"
<zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:

> "Mark S Bilk" <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> wrote in message
> news:c59ad337-2ef9-46ef-b9ef-c3fd27fb69b2@k6g2000pbq.googlegroups.com...
>> On Apr 9, 7:02 am, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> * Bilk claims that there was a video showing explosives
>>> being added to rebar by some secret government conspiracy
>> 
>> No, Snit is lying.  The video showed rebars arriving at the
>> WTC construction site already coated with a very flammable
>> material,
> 
> So you can tell just by looking at a video that the coating on the rebar was
> "very flammable" and possibly even explosive.

It was labeled "ACME flammable explosives"... and a Road Runner was seen
dropping them off.

I saw that video, too!

...
>>  and special welders with security clearances were
>> brought in to weld each new layer of rebars
> 
> Lack of proof noted.

The proof is on the magically disappearing video... of course!

> Oh yeah... some kook says on his website that "special
> welders with security clearances were used" so that's proof enough for a
> retard like Mark S. Bilk.  Other than what some kook claims on some kook
> website, is there any *real* proof of this?
> 
> Here's the fact retard - Nobody has EVER built a building in the history of
> civilization that was pre-wired with TONS of explosives so that it could be
> blown up in a minutes notice.

And even if they were, which they were not, Bilk has yet to explain why
types of batteries were used which worked flawlessly from the 1960s to the
time the Towers were brought down... could not be that just a few worked and
the concussion force set off the rest... if that was the case the plane
hitting the tower would have set them off (some mysterious force Bilk
refuses to speak about prevented that).

Really, the UMP claims make more sense than what Bilk is saying. Maybe that
is why he refuses to even try to refute the UMP idea... he knows it makes
more sense than his claims!

> There were ZERO buildings constructed this way before the WTC towers. There
> were ZERO buildings constructed this way after the WTC towers. And the WTC
> towers themselves were never constructed with tons of explosives hidden in
> the concrete so they could be blown up 30+ years later.

But a video that magically disappeared showed coatings on rebar...
presumably labeled "ACME flammable explosives" and dropped off by the Road
Runner.

> I'll make this simple for you - perhaps you can understand one of these
> subtle hints I'm giving you.
> 
> * You are a fucking retard.
> * You have brain damage.
> * Something is wrong with your brain.
> * You have to be incredibly stupid to think that this garbage you're
> spouting makes any sense at all.
> * The rest of the world with normal working brains are all laughing at you.
> * You and your stupid theories are a fucking joke.
> * Anyone who believes this garbage has shit for brains.
> 
> There - do you finally get it or are you still clinging on to that idiotic
> nonsense "theory" of yours?

Maybe next week he will take a step toward greater believability and argue
for the UMP. :)

-- 
"I have never, ever cared about really anything but the Linux desktop."
-- Linus Torvalds

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-09 09:16 -0700
  Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-09 09:56 -0700
    Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-09 11:19 -0700
      Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-09 15:46 -0400
        Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-09 12:58 -0700
          Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-09 16:12 -0400
          Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-09 13:42 -0700
          Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-09 18:29 -0400
            Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-09 16:31 -0700
        Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-09 13:40 -0700
      Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-09 13:08 -0700
        Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-09 13:31 -0700
        Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-09 14:07 -0700
          Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-09 14:35 -0700
          Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-09 14:38 -0700
            Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 14:43 -0700
            I will no longer respond to -hh Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-09 15:11 -0700
              Re: I will no longer respond to -hh Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2013-04-10 00:14 +0200
              Re: I will no longer respond to -hh Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 15:16 -0700
                Re: I will no longer respond to -hh Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-09 15:26 -0700
                Re: I will no longer respond to -hh Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 16:10 -0700
                Re: I will no longer respond to -hh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-09 16:41 -0700
              Re: I will no longer respond to -hh flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-09 20:22 -0400
                Re: I will no longer respond to -hh Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 17:25 -0700
                I will pay to join a SAG Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2013-04-10 08:39 -0700
                Re: I will no longer respond to -hh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-09 18:57 -0700
            Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-09 16:28 -0700
      Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-09 13:38 -0700
    Re: Complete Refutation of Snit Michael Glasser's List Of Lies About Me Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-09 13:18 -0700
  Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-09 14:01 -0400
    Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2013-04-09 20:25 +0200
      Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-09 15:47 -0400
      Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2013-04-09 16:09 -0400
        Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2013-04-09 22:22 +0200
          Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2013-04-09 16:46 -0400
            Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2013-04-10 09:29 +0100
              Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-10 10:41 -0400
        Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-10 07:05 -0500
          Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-10 17:06 +0000
    Re: Complete Idiocy and nonsense from Mark S. Bilk Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-09 13:49 -0700
  Bilk spews more nonsense and shows he is a hypocrite. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-09 13:02 -0700
    Re: Bilk spews more nonsense and shows he is a hypocrite. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 13:08 -0700
      Re: Bilk spews more nonsense and shows he is a hypocrite. Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 14:18 -0700

csiph-web