Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #115640

Re: lsof

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: lsof
Date 2012-06-21 17:24 -0700
Message-ID <CC090950.3CB7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References <y2NEr.184102$4v3.151047@fx08.am4> <jwbokcl1zo.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <js0aav$63t$1@dont-email.me> <df7gv0kyod.fsf@news.eternal-september.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/21/12 4:55 PM, in article df7gv0kyod.fsf@news.eternal-september.org,
"Hadron" <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:

> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes:
> 
>> On 6/21/2012 6:43 PM, Hadron wrote:
>>> 7<email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com>  writes:
>>> 
>>>> Learned something new today - lsof
>>>> 
>>>> List all open files.
>>>> 
>>>> Got 7000+ open files with Ubuntu.
>>>> 
>>>> Still it don't blink when asked to perform a task.
>>>> 
>>>> Totally amazing.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> And this amazes you , err, why?
>> 
>> I think it's pretty cool, if it's easy to filter and see open files by
>> process/app/location etc.
>> 
> 
> As a tool its useful. But I'm wondering how someone who wrote a real
> time transaction manager using the "power of linux" can possibly not
> know about it. Unless the little fraud was telling lies again?
> 
I am not a programmer but I knew of it and the GUI tools Apple provides.
Yeah, does seem odd he would be so excited by it and not have already known
of it.


-- 
The indisputable facts about that absurd debate: <http://goo.gl/2337P>
cc being proved wrong about his stats BS: <http://goo.gl/1aYrP>
7 simple questions cc will *never* answer: <http://goo.gl/cNBzu>
cc again pretends to be knowledgeable about things he is clueless about.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

lsof 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-06-21 23:15 +0100
  Re: lsof Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-21 15:37 -0700
  Re: lsof Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 23:43 +0100
    Re: lsof 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-06-21 23:56 +0100
    Re: lsof Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-21 15:57 -0700
      Re: lsof Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2012-06-21 23:27 -0400
        Re: lsof Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-21 22:24 -0700
          Re: lsof Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 08:02 +0100
            Re: lsof Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-22 07:37 -0700
        Re: lsof Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-22 06:21 -0400
    Re: lsof DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-21 19:21 -0400
      Re: lsof Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 00:55 +0100
        Re: lsof Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-21 17:24 -0700
        Re: lsof DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-22 22:21 -0400
          Re: lsof Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-23 14:16 +0200
            Re: lsof DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-23 09:07 -0400
      Re: lsof Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-21 17:27 -0700
      Re: lsof Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-06-22 08:51 +0200
        Re: lsof Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-22 06:35 -0400
  Re: lsof GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2012-06-21 17:38 -0600
  Re: lsof Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-22 06:21 -0400
  Re: lsof DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-22 22:21 -0400

csiph-web