Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #115183
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.uu.math.misc, comp.soft-sys.sas, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line |
| Date | 2012-06-18 23:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CC0563F3.3954%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <77767275-7c24-4374-885d-9b5e9e4512f4@z19g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <5fc81028-c533-422e-b1f7-d7b6b58af819@eh4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <CC04E790.38A6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <5587cf13-47ac-433d-9d1d-73a4fd9e9a48@d17g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> <708534c3-a8f3-462b-924c-c6a41f68696b@n16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 6/18/12 9:15 PM, in article 708534c3-a8f3-462b-924c-c6a41f68696b@n16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com, "Onion Knight" <onionknightgot@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 18, 10:45 pm, Steve Carroll <fretwiz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jun 18, 3:11 pm,Snit<use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> What I did not do, of course, was show that this increase was based on the >>> *causative* factors I spoke of >> >> Bullsh*t... the facts show that you even called it an "overall >> claim" (which clearly places it in the realm of causation) that UI >> improvements **will** (this one word highlights your lie here) bring >> new users: >> >> "Now I have theories and reasons for this - and, frankly - it would >> not really be contrary to my overall claims that focus on the UI, if >> successful, will bring new users." -Snit >> >> That's clearly a 'cause and effect' statement if there ever was one. >> That you have the nerve to say you're speaking outside the realm of >> causation is absurd. >> >>> - I was very clear the data merely correlated >>> with the prediction I made based on those factors. You got confused between >>> causation and correlation... as did cc. >> >> You're confused and you're lying... and no one is falling for it. > > You have no clue what the fuck you are talking about. Even your own > quotes show Snit making a prediction based on causes he thinks will > lead to a change. Then he showed that the change correlated with the > prediction. In 2011. He admitted it did not in 2012. > > You are too fucking stupid to understand causation and correlation. As noted elsewhere: Steve confuses the concepts of showing a correlation, which I did (my vague prediction correlated well with the data of the latter half of 2011) and proof of causation (something I never said the data proved). It really is not a hard concept... Carroll simply screwed up based on his own ignorance and is now lying. Oh well. That is what Carroll does. -- The indisputable facts about that absurd debate: <http://goo.gl/2337P> cc being proved wrong about his stats BS: <http://goo.gl/1aYrP> 7 simple questions cc will *never* answer: <http://goo.gl/cNBzu> cc again pretends to be knowledgeable about things he is clueless about.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-18 06:19 -0700
Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-18 09:25 -0700
Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 09:43 -0700
Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-18 09:52 -0700
Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-18 10:55 -0700
OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 09:32 -0700
Re: OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Onion Knight <onionknightgot@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 12:26 -0700
Re: OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-18 12:42 -0700
cc runs. Again. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-18 13:11 -0700
Re: cc runs. Again. cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-18 13:23 -0700
Re: cc runs. Again. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-18 13:42 -0700
Re: cc runs. Again. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 13:56 -0700
Re: cc runs. Again. cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2012-06-18 14:09 -0700
Re: cc runs. Again. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-18 14:31 -0700
Re: cc runs. Again. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 16:04 -0700
Re: OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re:Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2012-06-18 20:42 +0100
Re: OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-18 13:18 -0700
Re: OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 13:30 -0700
Re: OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Onion Knight <onionknightgot@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 13:48 -0700
Re: OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-18 14:11 -0700
Re: OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 15:45 -0700
Re: OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Onion Knight <onionknightgot@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 21:15 -0700
Re: OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-18 23:02 -0700
Re: OT: Summarization of Snit's 'Statistical Analysis' argument - Re: Visualizing where to draw the standard deviation line Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2012-06-19 09:12 -0700
csiph-web