Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #707838

Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge

From	CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
Subject	Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
References	<1896f06da19929fb$9371$1891408$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <10nk10b$3ptdq$4@dont-email.me> <18973120702e1ea9$24414$1308711$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <10nkjem$g5o$2@dont-email.me>
Date	2026-02-25 01:19 +0000
Message-ID	<699e4e34$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:25:58 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Farley Flud wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS:
> 
>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 06:11:07 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> yt-dlp --extract-audio --audio-format mp3 --audio-quality 192K \
>>>    --restrict-filenames "$*"
> 
> Meh. Even 128K is good enough for me.

Without great speakers, you won't notice much of a difference between a 
128kbps MP3 and a 320kbps one. However, it is very noticeable when there 
are lots of instruments playing simultaneously. The high compression makes 
it difficult to discern between drums, guitars and general noise.

>> That does not ensure optimum quality.
>>
>> You need to first determine what audio is available with "yt-dlp -F." 
>> For example:
> 
> Good to know.
> 
>> This can be good to go because ogg is better than mp3.
> 
> Can you play ogg in a car stereo?

Many car stereos support it. Nevertheless, most people nowadays would 
stream the music from a phone onto the car's stereo. If it's an Android 
phone, it supports Vorbis out of the box. That said, Vorbis has a better 
overall sound than MP3 unless the latter is compressed with the LAME 
encoder.

-- 
CrudeSausage
John 14:6
Isaiah 48:16
Pop_OS!

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

GNU/Linix CLI Challenge Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-23 17:30 +0000
  Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 12:35 -0500
  Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 06:11 -0500
    Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 06:13 -0500
    Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-24 13:16 +0000
      Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 08:46 -0500
      Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 11:25 -0500
        Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 11:30 -0500
        Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-02-24 17:17 +0000
          Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 12:32 -0500
            Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-02-24 13:15 -0500
              Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-02-24 13:41 -0500
        Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-02-25 01:19 +0000
      Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-24 16:23 -0500
  Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-02-24 16:04 -0500
    Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-02-28 11:41 +0000
  Re: GNU/Linix CLI Challenge Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-02-28 11:15 +0000

csiph-web