Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #33020

Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile
Date Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:16:02 +0100
Organization Dumb Willy Boaster @ Llareggub
Lines 29
Message-ID <263lc8-37a.ln1@linuxnetwork.alpha.org> (permalink)
References <8e9a94022d7c00c7bf7dba917ccf0bef@ecn.org> <92e89b9e-b7ec-438c-b0f5-a41b624d10a8@y30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <it89sk$a3f$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net jHAnPmTlER92dJQFilW/xwb4Crw58knAS0IxqHqPhS8R9kwdl1
X-Orig-Path linuxnetwork.alpha.org!news
Cancel-Lock sha1:SbDaZtLVUGxHLmxirBUQpC1Z1O0=
User-Agent XPN/1.2.6 (Street Spirit ; Linux)
X-Desktop KDE 4.6.2
X-COLA-Trolls The arseholes listed in http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ are ignored.
X-System Fedora 15 64-bit
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.os.linux.advocacy:33020

Show key headers only | View raw

In reply to Lusotec who posted:

> RayLopez99 wrote:
>> Anonymous wrote:
>>> http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_25/b4233041946230.htm
>>>
>>> Let's say you're a manufacturer of mobile phones and you're
>>> contemplating between x86 or ARM, which one would you pick? If you pick
>>> x86 you only have one vendor to choose from (Intel), OTOH if you pick
>>> an ARM-based processor you have DOZENS of manufacturers which will
>>> gladly sell you their wares. Which one do you figure will be cheaper?
>>> Exactly right: ARM.
>> 
>> WTF?  You crazy?  ARM controls all licensing out of their northern
>> California office, with revenues flowing back to England.  The fact
>> that dozens of manufacturers have signed up to this license makes no
>> difference.  You really think ARM is open source?
>
> No one, except you, made any reference to "open source" in this subject!

Do ALL the wintrolls have reading/comprehension problems? IS it a
requirement of being a wintroll?


-- 
Windows Breakthrough: It finally booted on the first try.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why Intel will fail in mobile Anonymous <cripto@ecn.org> - 2011-06-14 16:17 +0200
  Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:32 -0700
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 10:34 -0700
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 19:46 +0100
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-16 15:48 -0500
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-14 22:23 +0100
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 22:24 +0000
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 16:01 -0700
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 16:07 -0700
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 00:26 +0100
            Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile RayLopez99 <raylopez88@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 00:17 -0700
              Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 09:29 +0100
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-16 15:54 -0500
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 19:39 +0100
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-14 23:16 +0100
        Re: Dumb Willy Boaster,: a village idiot! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-15 21:32 +0200
          Re: Dumb Willy Boaster,: a village idiot! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-15 22:52 +0000
            Re: Dumb Willy Boaster,: a village idiot! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-17 16:12 +0200
  Re: Why Intel will (NOT) fail in mobile "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 13:55 -0400
  Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2011-06-14 19:35 +0100
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-06-14 14:53 -0400
  Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2011-06-14 19:54 +0100
    Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-14 17:14 -0400
      Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-15 17:11 +0200
        Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 21:45 +0200
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-15 15:48 -0400
          Re: Why Intel will fail in mobile JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-06-16 15:48 -0500

csiph-web