Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.mobile.android > #152036

Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo

From Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk>
Newsgroups comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo
Date 2025-12-21 14:57 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <slrn10kg2nb.aj3.jj@iridium.wf32df> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <10hgvvh$2son6$1@dont-email.me> <10hhj4m$ubn$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <10hoenp$1o13k$1@dont-email.me> <slrn10k8or2.9rs.jj@iridium.wf32df> <10i317p$10mgj$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2025-12-19, Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> wrote:
> Jim Jackson, 2025-12-18 21:26:
>
>> On 2025-12-15, Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> wrote:
>>> Marian, 2025-12-12 18:24:
>>>
>>>> Arno Welzel wrote:
>>>>>> It's shocking to me it's not just on:off for the controls.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because there are multiple options for it:
>>>>>
>>>>> - off
>>>>> - always on
>>>>> - automatic if needed
>>>>>
>>>>> And sometimes also additional features like filling flash or open or
>>>>> closing flash. When you are used to "real" cameras, you know, that a
>>>>> flash is not just a simple "on/off".
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I get it. I worked in the Silicon Valley on software that costs
>>>> millions per seat, so I'm fully aware how software developers think.
>>>
>>> That's not "how software developers think". Real cameras work this way.
>>> Did you ever use a real camera?
>>>
>> 
>> Thing is an awefull lot of phone camera users never used a "real" camera 
>> - a point and shoot instamatic or similar. "real" camera users are a 
>> minority. Very often having a simple mode, and an option for expert mode 
>> where lots of "real" things happen is often the best way to go.
>
> Even a piint and shoot camera has more settings than just "flash on" and
> "flash off". At least an automatic mode to use flash only if needed is
> often available.

Indeed with cheap automatics, that was often the only option. It often 
wasn't important to get absolute "correct" exposure, the film processing 
and printing shops often could auto-correct a stop or two when printing.

Another point is that flash teneded to be needed in more situations with 
film. 
<contraversial> Modern digital sensors have way better low light 
performance than most films did </contraversial> :-)

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Jakub <jak74@interia.pl> - 2025-12-02 10:57 +0100
  Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Marian <marianjones@helpfulpeople.com> - 2025-12-02 11:04 -0700
  Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-12-02 20:15 +0100
    Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Marian <marianjones@helpfulpeople.com> - 2025-12-02 16:01 -0700
      Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-12-03 00:49 +0100
        Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Marian <marianjones@helpfulpeople.com> - 2025-12-04 19:33 -0700
          Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-12-05 07:57 +0100
          Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-05 11:19 +0100
            Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Marian <marianjones@helpfulpeople.com> - 2025-12-09 19:22 -0700
          Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-12-12 12:57 +0100
            Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Marian <marianjones@helpfulpeople.com> - 2025-12-12 10:24 -0700
              Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-12-15 08:52 +0100
                Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2025-12-18 20:26 +0000
                Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-12-19 09:09 +0100
                Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2025-12-21 14:57 +0000
                Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Marian <marianjones@helpfulpeople.com> - 2025-12-23 13:01 -0700
                Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2025-12-23 21:20 +0000
                Re: Please to Test my apk at google play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo Marian <marianjones@helpfulpeople.com> - 2025-12-23 14:49 -0700

csiph-web