Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #148894
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: Pixel android upgrades |
| Date | Sun, 15 Jun 2025 17:03:37 +0200 |
| Organization | XXII |
| Lines | 19 |
| Message-ID | <mb85m8FtqvmU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <mare0jFoi4iU1@mid.individual.net> <mb36snF4drhU1@mid.individual.net> <mb3cgrF59qbU1@mid.individual.net> <mb3h92F617bU1@mid.individual.net> <102j2q2$p8pr$1@solani.org> <mb625hFj1niU2@mid.individual.net> <102klmm$qgnt$1@solani.org> |
| Reply-To | sb.nospam@belgacom.net |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net W5vK34xQwdUQXljtiiODzg6nQ9x9ORqV60Po6WLl1TQXfHs9EV |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:7sQcdJ95qProh5sVUruk4O1msNA= sha256:WddFMF24RuSuAtB+/EUyLd3fh9EbdCRUUsfZSXIUSsw= |
| User-Agent | ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 |
| X-Face | j0\WO?Dcjo^V#d7Q,H$9^8N{Z|fy50vxQkToel)jNR3hmCMV8kai(fMVJ:Yk}q?t<:xHu2D )?CJ[c|zu]%I!fKb7-4~$&Mx|GT=>ux^*,A:5Cdek,y4A(DSX=oXRv7-)/AcgHiWf |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.mobile.android:148894 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 22:22:46 +0200, Jörg Lorenz wrote: > An empty battery is even worse than a full one. General wisdom is 20% > over a longer period of time. The same plating effect at the cathode > side. Keep the SOC (State of Charge) between 20% and 80% if possible. > That applies to Lithium-Batteries. I expect the following reasoning to be wrong, but... 100 -> 20 = 80% 80 -> 20 = 60% First method gives me a fully charged smartphone in the morning and usually lasts all day. I feel like the second method will have me running around with a charger (and powerbank) all the time. While it may be better for the battery, it doesn't seem very practical. -- s|b
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Pixel android upgrades Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-06-10 20:05 +0100
Re: Pixel android upgrades Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-06-10 23:17 -0400
Re: Pixel android upgrades Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-06-11 10:47 +0200
Re: Pixel android upgrades Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-06-11 11:31 +0100
Re: Pixel android upgrades Jason H <jason_hindle@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-11 21:19 +0000
Re: Pixel android upgrades "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-13 19:53 +0200
Re: Pixel android upgrades Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-06-13 20:29 +0100
Re: Pixel android upgrades "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-13 22:50 +0200
Re: Pixel android upgrades Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-06-14 07:54 +0200
Re: Pixel android upgrades "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-14 21:51 +0200
Re: Pixel android upgrades Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-06-14 22:22 +0200
Re: Pixel android upgrades "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-15 17:03 +0200
Re: Pixel android upgrades Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-06-15 17:27 +0200
Re: Pixel android upgrades "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-17 17:47 +0200
Re: Pixel android upgrades AJL <noemail@none.com> - 2025-06-17 17:22 +0000
Re: Pixel android upgrades Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-06-17 21:49 +0200
Re: Pixel android upgrades Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-06-15 00:15 +0200
csiph-web