Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #147628
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware, comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! |
| Date | 2025-04-04 22:37 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <0hs5clxine.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink) |
| References | <58f17444fed8a45dfa7126b62215798e@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <vsmqi1$o5t6$2@solani.org> <1cc8e3f3ya87k.1bqokw6o0vqzs.dlg@40tude.net> <vsokq9$3f92k$2@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 2025-04-04 14:55, Newyana2 wrote: > On 4/4/2025 1:55 AM, JJ wrote: > >> I know what they're thinking. Advertising false sense of security. >> >> First of all, Tuta Mail _does not_ use standard email encryption - >> which is >> PGP. >> >> Second, email encryption is _optional_, and there's no email service >> that I >> know (feel free to point me out) which actually provide built-in PGP. >> >> Third, nothing can decrypt an encrypted data if it doesn't support >> encryption. >> >> So, sure. Tuta encrypt emails. But outgoing emails must be decrypted >> before >> they're sent to the recipient email servers - which aren't _always_ and >> likely are not Tuta Mail. And imcoming emails before they're received on >> Tuta Mail, aren't _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail - thus not >> encrypted. >> > > Mostly true. But better yet is to just block "Fritz Wuehler". > It's sleazy, nonsense spam. Do you really want to debate spam? I don't remember who, but it is probably this chap, that posts in Usenet trying to promote that Tuta thing, for years. That said, I am interested in an analysis that explains why this Tuta is not that good. It negates what the spammer tries to achieve ;-) -- Cheers, Carlos.
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
We Know What You Are Thinking! Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202504.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2025-04-03 20:20 +0200
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-04-03 22:20 +0200
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! JJ <jj4public@outlook.com> - 2025-04-04 12:55 +0700
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! "Allan Higdon" <allanh@vivaldi.net> - 2025-04-04 01:34 -0500
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-04-04 09:06 +0200
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-04-04 09:11 +0200
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2025-04-04 07:57 +0042
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-04 08:55 -0400
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-04-04 16:17 +0200
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! "Jan K." <janicekoziol@nie.ma.spamu.prosze.com> - 2025-04-04 20:07 +0000
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-04 17:08 -0400
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! TuTits <tutits@tmail.com> - 2025-04-06 13:04 +0200
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-04-04 22:37 +0200
Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2025-04-03 22:47 +0200
csiph-web