Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.mobile.android > #147628

Re: We Know What You Are Thinking!

From "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware, comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: We Know What You Are Thinking!
Date 2025-04-04 22:37 +0200
Message-ID <0hs5clxine.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References <58f17444fed8a45dfa7126b62215798e@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <vsmqi1$o5t6$2@solani.org> <1cc8e3f3ya87k.1bqokw6o0vqzs.dlg@40tude.net> <vsokq9$3f92k$2@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 2025-04-04 14:55, Newyana2 wrote:
> On 4/4/2025 1:55 AM, JJ wrote:
> 
>> I know what they're thinking. Advertising false sense of security.
>>
>> First of all, Tuta Mail _does not_ use standard email encryption - 
>> which is
>> PGP.
>>
>> Second, email encryption is _optional_, and there's no email service 
>> that I
>> know (feel free to point me out) which actually provide built-in PGP.
>>
>> Third, nothing can decrypt an encrypted data if it doesn't support
>> encryption.
>>
>> So, sure. Tuta encrypt emails. But outgoing emails must be decrypted 
>> before
>> they're sent to the recipient email servers - which aren't _always_ and
>> likely are not Tuta Mail. And imcoming emails before they're received on
>> Tuta Mail, aren't _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail - thus not
>> encrypted.
>>
> 
>    Mostly true. But better yet is to just block "Fritz Wuehler".
> It's sleazy, nonsense spam. Do you really want to debate spam?

I don't remember who, but it is probably this chap, that posts in Usenet 
trying to promote that Tuta thing, for years.

That said, I am interested in an analysis that explains why this Tuta is 
not that good. It negates what the spammer tries to achieve ;-)

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

We Know What You Are Thinking! Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202504.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2025-04-03 20:20 +0200
  Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-04-03 22:20 +0200
    Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! JJ <jj4public@outlook.com> - 2025-04-04 12:55 +0700
      Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! "Allan Higdon" <allanh@vivaldi.net> - 2025-04-04 01:34 -0500
      Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-04-04 09:06 +0200
      Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-04-04 09:11 +0200
        Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2025-04-04 07:57 +0042
      Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-04 08:55 -0400
        Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-04-04 16:17 +0200
          Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! "Jan K." <janicekoziol@nie.ma.spamu.prosze.com> - 2025-04-04 20:07 +0000
            Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-04 17:08 -0400
          Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! TuTits <tutits@tmail.com> - 2025-04-06 13:04 +0200
        Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-04-04 22:37 +0200
  Re: We Know What You Are Thinking! Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2025-04-03 22:47 +0200

csiph-web