Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk |
| Date | 2018-08-28 11:23 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrnpoac63.u91.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> (permalink) |
| References | <8mMON2qtBUeCo7cA0fHFuzKq@dont-email.me> <pm0u2m$2a5$1@dont-email.me> <20180827184659@news.eternal-september.org> <871saj6pgo.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> |
Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid>: >> Just another lie. Yet there are people who can't understand why some >> of us don't trust government. > > The same people who swear by the US Constitution trust the government > the least. > > So is the US Constitution an utter failure or not? Or is the problem > with the quality of the citizenry? More that there is the realization of the fallibility of man, and the reasonably well-documented proof that governments tend toward amassing power ... and the more power there is, the more potential for corruption. > > There are more modern countries with fresher constitutions and more > functioning governments. It's funny how the Americans by and large want > their governments to stay away from their lives while in Finland (where > I live) people constantly demand the government do more for them. Sparknotes version of it is that the US was pretty much founded on the idea that "the government" is a required evil to ensure that (in general), the governed people retain their liberties. To that end, when the US Constitution was written, the states would not ratify it without the Bill of Rights being added in (NOTE -- those amendments are not _granting_ the people anything they didn't already have), as the state governments and, by extension, the people governed were (rightly) worried that at some point in the future, the government could become tyrannical (or at the very least, infringe on those rights). We can see some of that happening in places like Canada, where "hate speech(tm)" laws have been enacted. Whereas here, I can legally say anything I want about some dude dressing up in his wife's clothes, without being arrested for "saying mean thingsi(tm)" (or whatever). -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2018-08-26 14:06 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-08-27 09:05 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk mausg@mail.com - 2018-08-27 15:23 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Nyssa <Nyssa@flawlesslogic.com> - 2018-08-27 09:23 -0400
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-08-27 13:58 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2018-08-27 15:30 +0100
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Nyssa <Nyssa@flawlesslogic.com> - 2018-08-27 12:38 -0400
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2018-08-27 15:58 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-08-27 22:52 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2018-08-28 08:16 +0300
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-28 11:23 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2018-08-28 18:04 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-08-28 23:21 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2018-08-28 07:52 +0000
Re: [Link Posting] Phone Numbers Were Never Meant as ID. Now We're All At Risk Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2018-08-28 11:03 +0000
csiph-web