Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption |
| Date | 2026-05-26 16:51 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrn111bjtf.cp7.oldernow@oldernow.jethrick.com> (permalink) |
| References | <10v02op$tv1o$1@dont-email.me> <10v0gi8$11kag$2@dont-email.me> <10v4hrd$coq$1@panix2.panix.com> |
On 2026-05-26, Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote: > Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >>On Sun, 24 May 2026 19:48:39 -0400, InterLinked wrote: >> >>> Now is the time to have solidarity with those >>> who need to have access to landline service >>> for emergencies and reliable 911 access. >>> And as the "analog divide" expands, so too >>> does the digital divide, as people with access >>> only to DSL or dial-up have that taken away >>> from them too. >> >> Yes, but ... Government action to protect >> access to such a service is considered >> Socialism, isnt it? > > If telcos want to eliinate POTS, that's fine, > as long as they find some other way to meet > the tariff for the POTS service to the letter. > > What is going on is actually not telcos wanting > to get rid of POTS, it is a matter of telcos > wanting to eliminate tariffed services with > access and uptime requirements, so they can > replace them with unregulated services that > they can charge anything that they want for. Holy crimenies! That's like at least a notch and a half lower on the Objective Virtue Scale than USENET trolls!!! -- v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v | alt.troll.adam-h-kerman: proof that the | | internet sometimes gets something right | ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption InterLinked <usenet@phreaknet.org> - 2026-05-24 19:48 -0400
Re: AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-25 03:44 +0000
Re: AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-25 08:44 +0100
Re: AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-25 11:14 +0000
Re: AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-05-26 12:30 -0400
Re: AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption oldernow <oldernow@dev.null> - 2026-05-26 16:51 +0000
Re: AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-26 22:45 +0000
Re: AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-05-27 00:46 -0400
Re: AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-05-27 05:47 +0000
Re: AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-05-28 02:24 -0400
Re: AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-05-25 12:05 +0000
Re: AT&T sues California to abandon POTS customers, seeks FCC preemption not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-05-26 10:38 +1000
csiph-web