Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Pokemon Go |
| Date | 2016-07-17 22:40 +0000 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <nmh1hg$ad4$2@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <dur4qvF3gm2U1@mid.individual.net> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1607151026190.11899@darkstar.example.org> <nmb3gn$r8i$2@dont-email.me> |
On 2016-07-15, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: > Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Sylvia Else wrote: >> >>> I just don't get it. What is the fascination with this game? >>> >> Even old media covers "viral" stories. But I have no idea if they got >> good travel before landing in old media, or if old media is a vector for >> that high travel. > > More likely it is this: "if we 'cover' those 'viral' stories, we get > more ad impressions, therefore we get more ad revenue". > > I.e., they (old media) are covering it not because it is at all > newsworthy, but because they are chasing dollars. Yet another reason to let the "free content in exchange for advertising dollars" model die in a fire. Once you have to pay for content the balance of content will be different, and niche subjects of quality - if they find enough readers willing to pay - will be able to sustain themselves. Essentially, the same model as the print magazines had back "in the day." The only thing to have changed will be the medium from paper to digital.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Pokemon Go Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-15 13:49 +1000
Re: Pokemon Go Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-07-15 06:47 +0000
Re: Pokemon Go Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-15 19:48 +1000
Re: Pokemon Go Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-15 13:00 +0300
Re: Pokemon Go Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-07-16 04:09 -0300
Re: Pokemon Go mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-07-15 18:54 +0100
Re: Pokemon Go juu <juu@opmbx.org> - 2016-07-15 11:32 +0300
Re: Pokemon Go Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-07-15 10:15 +0000
Re: Pokemon Go Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-07-15 10:29 -0400
Re: Pokemon Go Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-15 17:44 +0300
Re: Pokemon Go Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-07-15 16:37 +0000
Re: Pokemon Go RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-07-17 22:40 +0000
Re: Pokemon Go British Rocket Group <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-08-06 20:50 +0000
Re: Pokemon Go RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-08-06 21:31 -0400
Re: Pokemon Go RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-07-15 21:48 +0000
Re: Pokemon Go "Andy K." <andy.k466@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 00:13 +0200
Re: Pokemon Go Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2016-07-16 21:41 +0100
csiph-web