Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	D <nospam@example.net>
Newsgroups	comp.misc
Subject	Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI
Date	Mon, 24 Feb 2025 23:12:14 +0100
Organization	i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID	<cb595f8b-6730-5a4c-dfdf-37d34919f121@example.net> (permalink)
References	<67bbecb3$3$14$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <20250224102313.45fe1242@ryz.dorfdsl.de> <7ec34131-7626-e149-fa01-90770ff4fd7a@example.net> <20250224143020.21ae3ece@ryz.dorfdsl.de>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-31699547-1740435136=:3721"
Injection-Info	i2pn2.org; logging-data="1624811"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="w/4CleFT0XZ6XfSuRJzIySLIA6ECskkHxKUAYDZM66M";
X-Spam-Checker-Version	SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To	<20250224143020.21ae3ece@ryz.dorfdsl.de>
Xref	csiph.com comp.misc:26647

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, 24 Feb 2025, Marco Moock wrote:

> On 24.02.2025 11:14 Uhr D wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025, Marco Moock wrote:
>>
>>> On 24.02.2025 03:51 Uhr Retrograde wrote:
>>>
>>>> Title: Mozilla once again confirms it’s all about ads and “AI” now
>>>>
>>>
>>> Confirms again that my choice of Pale Moon was a good decision.
>>
>> This is the truth! But it has the weakness of being a fork of FF, so
>> when FF dies, so will Pale moon. =(
>
> It diverged that much that the current FF is almost irrelevant for it.

That's great news! Then there is hope!

>> I hope the ladybug browser will really take off! That could be
>> exactly what we are all looking for!
>
> I hope too, but I have serious doubt.
>
>> Ladybug also had the wisdom to not cave in to demands from political
>> activists to turn it into a DEI project. They said that they focus on
>> technology and not on politics. I think this was a very wise move
>> from them.
>
> A wise choice for every software.

This is the way!

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> - 2025-02-24 03:51 +0000
  Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-02-24 10:23 +0100
    Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-24 11:14 +0100
      Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-02-24 14:30 +0100
        Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-24 23:12 +0100
        Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-02-24 22:29 +0000
          Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-02-25 17:13 +0100
    Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2025-03-02 12:31 +0000
  Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-24 10:42 +0100
    Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> - 2025-02-24 21:07 -0300
  Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI anthk <anthk@openbsd.home> - 2025-03-10 07:59 +0000
    Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2025-03-10 09:21 +0042
      Re: Firefox wants a bit of ads+AI yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2025-03-10 09:31 +0042

csiph-web