Re: On Binary Digits

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>
Newsgroups	comp.misc
Subject	Re: On Binary Digits
Date	Tue, 01 Apr 2025 17:35:24 +0100
Organization	Frantic
Message-ID	<86v7rnj0vn.fsf@example.com> (permalink)
References	<vsh2fn$3fpam$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
Injection-Info	solani.org; logging-data="697805"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:2Zq21h0XIFBV0SEhfR1wJKZs/W0= sha1:jDqFHRUAqhFVhr9I6H2uqW7t8m0=
X-User-ID	eJwNwoERwEAEBMCWyHEoh3/pv4Rkdh1UnjA6zd9fT96WxiO+ohezE6eQKgYebiprSzrEodsfG4oQvA==
Xref	csiph.com comp.misc:27148

Show key headers only | View raw

Ben Collver <bencollver@tilde.pink> writes:

> To cope with this problem some workers have devised their own
> conventions of writing and pronouncing such numbers. A system in use
> at the Bell Telephone Laboratories would set off the above figure in
> groups of three digits:
>
>     11,110,101,000
>
> and would then pronounce each group of three (or less) separately as
> its decimal equivalent. The first binary group, 11, is the equivalent
> of the decimal 3; the second, 110, of the decimal 6; the third, 101,
> of the decimal 5. (000 is zero in any notation.) The above would then
> be read, "Three, six, five, zero."

This is called Octal, is it not.

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

On Binary Digits Ben Collver <bencollver@tilde.pink> - 2025-04-01 15:58 +0000
  Re: On Binary Digits Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-04-01 17:35 +0100
    Re: On Binary Digits Ben Collver <bencollver@tilde.pink> - 2025-04-02 16:37 +0000
      Re: On Binary Digits arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) - 2025-04-02 16:45 +0000
        Re: On Binary Digits Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2025-04-02 20:40 +0000
        Re: On Binary Digits Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-04 19:03 +0000
          Re: On Binary Digits anthk <anthk@openbsd.home> - 2025-05-12 06:24 +0000
            Re: On Binary Digits Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-05-12 19:56 +0100
      Re: On Binary Digits Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2025-04-02 20:41 +0000
        Re: On Binary Digits Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2025-04-03 12:08 +0300
  Re: On Binary Digits Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-01 22:31 +0000
  Re: On Binary Digits vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-03 02:05 +0000
    Re: On Binary Digits snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-04-03 09:32 +0100
      Re: On Binary Digits kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-04-03 17:33 -0400
      Re: On Binary Digits vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-04-04 07:19 +0000
        Re: On Binary Digits snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-04-04 11:53 +0100

csiph-web