Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Stoicism [was: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms] |
| Date | 2024-01-17 12:31 +0100 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <6463bd83-cfd1-3df1-26ae-e264320e948b@example.net> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <87r0k2u45w.fsf@yaxenu.org> <groups-20231204134242@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <20231230212158.f1195c840ef1abe60af9a4ee@gmail.moc> <87ttnwnb36.fsf@neptune> <20240116135641.d6cc75e8aaf1bf7db6d227dc@g{oogle}mail.com> |
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, Anton Shepelev wrote: > So you have read the big four -- Epictetus, Musonius Rufus, > Marcus Aurelius (not a philosopher), and Seneca (not a > philosopher)? No, I do not believe fatalism/determinism is > postulated by all stoics, especially the Roman ones, who > concentrated on the practical, ethical aspect. The main > priciple, I am sure, is realising that man is in control of > his own perceptions and decisions, and cannot (entirely) > control externalities. This view does not require > determinism, does it? I agree. Determinism tends to lead to passivity and at worst collapse into some kind of solipsism, if you really believe in it. The fact that people argue that you still should give your best, paradoxically weakens their position, since the act of arguing that is itself and argument against determinism. I have no read anything about determinism in the above, but I have read about indifference, but in my opinion, that indifference in the classics is not equivalent to determinism. Best regards, Daniel
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2023-12-03 12:32 -0300
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2023-12-03 22:50 -0300
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2023-12-04 08:30 +0000
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> - 2023-12-04 08:11 -0600
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2023-12-04 14:20 +0000
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2023-12-04 20:24 -0300
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2023-12-05 06:55 +1000
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2023-12-04 23:48 +0000
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> - 2023-12-12 03:07 +0000
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-12-30 21:21 +0300
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms cr0c0d1le <cr0c0d1le.ewlkg@8shield.net> - 2024-01-01 13:49 -0500
Stoicism [was: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms] Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2024-01-16 13:56 +0300
Re: Stoicism [was: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms] D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-01-17 12:31 +0100
Re: Stoicism [was: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms] D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-01-17 12:48 +0100
Re: Stoicism [was: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms] Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2024-01-17 16:42 +0300
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2023-12-04 20:29 -0300
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-12-24 01:03 +0300
Re: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2023-12-24 04:12 -0300
csiph-web