Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.mail.uucp > #205
| From | immibis <news@immibis.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mail.uucp |
| Subject | Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP |
| Date | 2023-12-19 15:04 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <uls7ub$27po$5@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <ull181$mlk$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <ull5mm$2ib41$1@dont-email.me> <ulm37m$9se$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <ulouhj$3dih3$1@dont-email.me> <ulplvb$gp8$4@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> |
On 12/18/23 15:46, Grant Taylor wrote: > My interpretation was something along the lines of the years old issue > of needing to source route from the sender to the recipient. For a > while there was effort under way to have UUCP nodes derive a route to > the destination node. My understanding is that this was based on shared > data and wasn't automatically discoverable in any sense. > Routing inherently relies on shared data. Nodes need to know how distant nodes are connected to each other. If you already have Usenet running, you can propagate it through Usenet. Routing is a theoretically solved problem, but you might not like the tradeoffs of any particular solution. There are two main ideas: one is to propagate information about the entire network's connectivity throughout the entire network, so that each node can independently compute the paths it needs. This works quite well until it runs into scalability problems (probably in the hundreds of thousands, if not millions of nodes nowadays). This is called link-state routing, and is used in most routing protocols. The other idea is for each node to tell its neighbours which nodes it knows how to reach. There's no non-local data sharing. While this works very well in a spanning tree, you have to add some extra information to make it handle loops acceptably. For UUCP you'd want to pass the whole bang path around (if you still want source routing), and you get a path-vector protocol similar to BGP. Most administratively closed networks use link-state routing, and the internet at large uses a path-vector protocol (BGP) which seems to work better as it requires less cooperation between nodes. Note that link-state routing of hop-by-hop-routed protocols requires all nodes to compute exactly the same paths to avoid cycles. This may be another reason the Internet uses path-vector. This limitation doesn't apply to source-routed protocols.
Back to comp.mail.uucp | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP Mima-sama <mi@masa.ma> - 2023-09-10 19:49 +0800
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2023-09-10 15:00 +0200
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP immibis <news@immibis.com> - 2023-12-16 16:03 +0100
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2023-12-16 13:37 -0600
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2023-12-16 20:58 +0100
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2023-12-16 14:27 -0600
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2023-12-16 22:43 +0100
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2023-12-17 00:07 -0600
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP immibis <news@immibis.com> - 2023-12-18 09:06 +0100
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2023-12-18 08:46 -0600
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP immibis <news@immibis.com> - 2023-12-19 15:04 +0100
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2023-12-19 09:04 -0600
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP Andy Valencia <vandys@vsta.org> - 2023-12-25 15:06 -0800
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP immibis <news@immibis.com> - 2024-01-02 00:38 +0100
Re: introducing the new federated anarchist networking protocol: UUCP cp@ruraldashnetwork.com (CP) - 2023-09-22 14:46 +0000
csiph-web