Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.mail.sendmail > #8224

Re: TCPWRAPPERS vs gcc 15 (was: sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.15 ...)

From Claus Aßmann <INVALID_NO_CC_REMOVE_IF_YOU_DO_NOT_POST_ml+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@esmtp.org>
Newsgroups comp.mail.sendmail
Subject Re: TCPWRAPPERS vs gcc 15 (was: sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.15 ...)
Date 2025-11-19 12:03 -0500
Organization MGT Consulting
Message-ID <10fkt9m$98h$1@news.misty.com> (permalink)
References <10dtfqk$ne9$1@news.misty.com> <1763047661342248335$e8aedcf4@rocksolid-us.pugleaf.net> <10fid0l$70d$1@news.misty.com> <1763561639067402458$1e7eb207@rocksolid-us.pugleaf.net>

Show all headers | View raw

HQuest  wrote:

> > diff --git a/sendmail/conf.c b/sendmail/conf.c
> > -	extern int hosts_ctl();
> > +	extern int hosts_ctl __P((char *, char *, char *, char *));

> I do use gcc 15.2. The patch above seems to make the compiler going and
> produces an initially good binary:

Thanks, the patch has been committed.

> The patch, however, was applied on a different line (4078 instead of
> 4117) of the conf.c file. Maybe yours is already a newer snapshot?

The patch is generated from our internal development code
which can differ from a released snapshot.

Back to comp.mail.sendmail | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.15 is available for testing Claus Aßmann <INVALID_NO_CC_REMOVE_IF_YOU_DO_NOT_POST_ml+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@esmtp.org> - 2025-10-29 12:36 -0400
  Re: sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.15 is available for testing HQuest <noreply@pugleaf.invalid> - 2025-11-13 15:27 +0000
    Re: sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.15 is available for testing Claus Aßmann <INVALID_NO_CC_REMOVE_IF_YOU_DO_NOT_POST_ml+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@esmtp.org> - 2025-11-13 11:47 -0500
      Re: TCPWRAPPERS compilation problem (was: sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.15 ...) Claus Aßmann <INVALID_NO_CC_REMOVE_IF_YOU_DO_NOT_POST_ml+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@esmtp.org> - 2025-11-18 02:50 -0500
    Re: TCPWRAPPERS vs gcc 15 (was: sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.15 ...) Claus Aßmann <INVALID_NO_CC_REMOVE_IF_YOU_DO_NOT_POST_ml+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@esmtp.org> - 2025-11-18 13:13 -0500
      Re: TCPWRAPPERS vs gcc 15 (was: sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.15 ...) HQuest <noreply@pugleaf.net.invalid> - 2025-11-19 14:13 +0000
        Re: TCPWRAPPERS vs gcc 15 (was: sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.15 ...) Claus Aßmann <INVALID_NO_CC_REMOVE_IF_YOU_DO_NOT_POST_ml+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@esmtp.org> - 2025-11-19 12:03 -0500

csiph-web