Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!.POSTED.veps.esmtp.org!not-for-mail From: Claus =?iso-8859-1?Q?A=DFmann?= Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail Subject: Re: TCPWRAPPERS vs gcc 15 (was: sendmail snapshot 8.18.1.15 ...) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 12:03:50 -0500 (EST) Organization: MGT Consulting Sender: Message-ID: <10fkt9m$98h$1@news.misty.com> References: <10dtfqk$ne9$1@news.misty.com> <1763047661342248335$e8aedcf4@rocksolid-us.pugleaf.net> <10fid0l$70d$1@news.misty.com> <1763561639067402458$1e7eb207@rocksolid-us.pugleaf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 17:03:50 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.misty.com; posting-host="veps.esmtp.org:155.138.203.148"; logging-data="9489"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@misty.com" Mail-Copies-To: never X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Originator: ca@x2.esmtp.org (Claus Assmann) Xref: csiph.com comp.mail.sendmail:8224 HQuest wrote: > > diff --git a/sendmail/conf.c b/sendmail/conf.c > > - extern int hosts_ctl(); > > + extern int hosts_ctl __P((char *, char *, char *, char *)); > I do use gcc 15.2. The patch above seems to make the compiler going and > produces an initially good binary: Thanks, the patch has been committed. > The patch, however, was applied on a different line (4078 instead of > 4117) of the conf.c file. Maybe yours is already a newer snapshot? The patch is generated from our internal development code which can differ from a released snapshot.