Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #3103 > unrolled thread
| Started by | donvnielsen <donvnielsen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-04-18 08:26 -0700 |
| Last post | 2011-04-19 22:20 -0500 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.ruby
Rspec Before/After All/Each order of operation donvnielsen <donvnielsen@gmail.com> - 2011-04-18 08:26 -0700
Re: Rspec Before/After All/Each order of operation Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 22:20 -0500
| From | donvnielsen <donvnielsen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-18 08:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Rspec Before/After All/Each order of operation |
| Message-ID | <04da7e75-001a-46c5-a751-d037fa0f5582@o21g2000prh.googlegroups.com> |
I'm using Rspec for testing. I'm seeking confirmation of the
following, that the way it is laid out is how it is supposed to
function. Rspec is supposed to test the inner describe Before(:all)
before it tests the outer describe before(:each). I can see how it
should be that way, in that the inner Before(:all) is probably more
important to the inner describe function than the outer
before(:each). It just feels a little un-intuitive that way. I just
want to make sure that is exactly as planned. Thanks for your time.
describe ClassNameHere,'Outer test wrapper' do
before(:all) do # (01)
puts '(1) First in operation'
end
before(:each) do
puts '(3) Third in operation'
end
after(:each) do
puts '(4) Fourth in operation'
end
after(:all) do
puts '(5) Last in operation - cleanup my mess'
end
describe 'Inner test wrapper #1' do
before(:all) do
puts '(2a) Second operation'
end
end
describe 'Inner test wrapper #2' do
before(:all) do
puts '(2b) I got here - no tmp'
end
end
end
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-19 22:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <95038dd754dadffa5b0591af09aac155@ruby-forum.com> |
| In reply to | #3103 |
maybe repost to the rspec group? They're usually quite responsive. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.ruby
csiph-web