Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #4341 > unrolled thread

RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.ruby

Contents

  RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth? Quintus <sutniuq@gmx.net> - 2011-05-12 05:35 -0500
    Re: RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth? Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> - 2011-05-12 06:27 -0500
      Re: RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth? Quintus <sutniuq@gmx.net> - 2011-05-12 15:15 -0500
    Re: RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth? Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> - 2011-05-12 16:00 -0500
      Re: RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth? Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> - 2011-05-12 16:21 -0500
        Re: RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth? Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> - 2011-05-12 18:59 -0500
          Re: RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth? Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> - 2011-05-13 02:49 -0500
        Re: RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth? Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> - 2011-05-13 06:50 -0700
          Re: RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth? Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> - 2011-05-13 09:25 -0500
            Re: RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth? Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> - 2011-05-13 08:20 -0700

#4341 — RubyGems 1.8 treats warnings as errors for C extensions, fails to install RedCloth?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi there,

I just tried to install the RedCloth gem:

========================================
$ LANG=en_US.utf8 sudo gem install RedCloth
Fetching: RedCloth-4.2.7.gem (100%)
Building native extensions.  This could take a while...
ERROR:  Error installing RedCloth:
	ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension.

        /opt/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/bin/ruby extconf.rb
checking for main() in -lc... yes
creating Makefile

make
gcc -I. -I/opt/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/include/ruby-1.9.1/x86_64-linux
- -I/opt/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/include/ruby-1.9.1/ruby/backward
- -I/opt/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/include/ruby-1.9.1 -I.   -fPIC -O3 -ggdb
- -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-parentheses -Wpointer-arith
- -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-long-long  -fPIC
- -O0 -Wall -Werror  -o redcloth_inline.o -c redcloth_inline.c
ragel/redcloth_inline.c.rl: In function ‘red_block’:
ragel/redcloth_inline.c.rl:99:9: error: variable ‘attr_regs’ set but not
used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

make: *** [redcloth_inline.o] Error 1


Gem files will remain installed in
/opt/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/RedCloth-4.2.7 for
inspection.
Results logged to
/opt/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/RedCloth-4.2.7/ext/redcloth_scan/gem_make.out
========================================

Obviously RedCloth generates some warnings during compilation, and now
RubyGems advises the compiler to treat them as errors--as far as I know
this wasn't the case with previous versions of RubyGems, because some
days ago RedCloth installed without problems (no, no new release of
RedCloth happened in the meantime). This causes the installation of
RedCloth to fail.
I'm not against treating warnings as errors, but there should be a way
to disable this setting, maybe via a commandline option
- --ignore-compilation-warnings or something like that, because I'm not a
RedCloth developer and therefore not interested in the warnings.

Further information on my system:

uname -a:
Linux hades 2.6.38-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue May 3 07:40:34 CEST 2011
x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 640 Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux

ruby -v:
ruby 1.9.2p180 (2011-02-18 revision 30909) [x86_64-linux]

gem env:
RubyGems Environment:
  - RUBYGEMS VERSION: 1.8.2
  - RUBY VERSION: 1.9.2 (2011-02-18 patchlevel 180) [x86_64-linux]
  - INSTALLATION DIRECTORY: /opt/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1
  - RUBY EXECUTABLE: /opt/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/bin/ruby
  - EXECUTABLE DIRECTORY: /opt/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/bin
  - RUBYGEMS PLATFORMS:
    - ruby
    - x86_64-linux
  - GEM PATHS:
     - /opt/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1
     - /home/quintus/.gem/ruby/1.9.1
  - GEM CONFIGURATION:
     - :update_sources => true
     - :verbose => true
     - :benchmark => false
     - :backtrace => false
     - :bulk_threshold => 1000
     - "install" => "--format-executable"
     - "update" => "--format-executable"
     - "rdoc" => "--format=hanna"
  - REMOTE SOURCES:
     - http://rubygems.org/

Valete,
Marvin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNy7euAAoJELh1XLHFkqhaAiYH/23x5jFcqXKWKRe9xEitCvcj
js+ZxO6oNyDOiMxL7qD9GaCXywbU6/0ivPyueoVVj8f1sR47omhe9v/iZiKUtEpq
5YGMF5CsgmLV5rIzoFq8RghccDGTYyM8PMJiHwSp7oNv2JZuQvG7NLpPOG8lnHKh
XupTuS/7jq+K6g/Ddy1GW6/UhPj3FjZ2jaGoFHW7vZvGmCvER2xu/JsuvIgU1bYZ
78KhxExSrM/REAoGfWv0kuKtablfkSqnvO1nzxzr4MSOwXao7M2Lw7fFnuUVsbjO
vXuSa93Fut/kwtvOdDB3uAkTrICV1plEAehfyaflg7YCSMPsMO+n5u3CqUs0evU=
=n68h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#4342

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:35, Quintus <sutniuq@gmx.net> wrote:

> Obviously RedCloth generates some warnings during compilation, and now
> RubyGems advises the compiler to treat them as errors

RedCloth adds -Werror, see

https://github.com/jgarber/redcloth/blob/master/tasks/compile.rake#L33

> somedays ago RedCloth installed without problems

It seems your environment has changed in some other way.  Perhaps GCC
has been upgraded?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4427

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 12.05.2011 13:27, schrieb Nikolai Weibull:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:35, Quintus <sutniuq@gmx.net> wrote:
> 
>> Obviously RedCloth generates some warnings during compilation, and now
>> RubyGems advises the compiler to treat them as errors
> 
> RedCloth adds -Werror, see
> 
> https://github.com/jgarber/redcloth/blob/master/tasks/compile.rake#L33

You're right, that's odd. Then it's a bug in RedCloth, as it's obviously
supposed to build without warnings. I'll report this to the RedCloth
team. Thanks.

>> somedays ago RedCloth installed without problems
> 
> It seems your environment has changed in some other way.  Perhaps GCC
> has been upgraded?
> 

Indeed, last friday I upgraded several things. I'm not sure wheather or
not GCC has been affected, but at least it's possible. Thanks again.

Vale,
Marvin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNzD+0AAoJELh1XLHFkqhai9QIAJSoSd+iGo/3QmZzVGc8Espk
M5/jo+AaO68MGdLPTS/VlP6G0Y38IDiFEVdLNXx6w3Cnrtivn2EjufhHzGFFFfjB
9Mn3deAF5m21UFdR2ohnqpJLVdfWdCmNcJESVLcwRnWa4R8rrvMtlvEDbYG9DgRY
NFJnRAfTNvZ0RYqE/UKHthycLrTklFhlSAV8xHkaCjEV+BF1Yu8pNvzaPOSLEylC
KXfdAQu+68UQuzTC4S4Tvi1vOJupIQK27ewwC26pMOYTaoewSuhtntTprp1XvA6e
mjDWxeBCNx5NXdH0LaNS4GWx77GlV7e1JTtHCljh/s0JSkMZO1WLOtGyl9T6u4s=
=ty9t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4435

On May 12, 2011, at 03:35 , Quintus wrote:

> Obviously RedCloth generates some warnings during compilation, and now
> RubyGems advises the compiler to treat them as errors--as far as I know
> this wasn't the case with previous versions of RubyGems, because some
> days ago RedCloth installed without problems (no, no new release of
> RedCloth happened in the meantime). This causes the installation of
> RedCloth to fail.

Can we stop with the knee-jerk reaction to blame rubygems for everything including the national deficit?

Rubygems calls make/rake/whatever. That's it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4438

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 23:00, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:

> On May 12, 2011, at 03:35 , Quintus wrote:

>> Obviously RedCloth generates some warnings during compilation, and now
>> RubyGems advises the compiler to treat them as errors--as far as I know
>> this wasn't the case with previous versions of RubyGems, because some
>> days ago RedCloth installed without problems (no, no new release of
>> RedCloth happened in the meantime). This causes the installation of
>> RedCloth to fail.

> Can we stop with the knee-jerk reaction to blame rubygems for everything including the national deficit?
>
> Rubygems calls make/rake/whatever. That's it.

Was this really necessary?  Make the output clearer instead of
complaining that people don’t understand it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4446

On May 12, 2011, at 14:21 , Nikolai Weibull wrote:

> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 23:00, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
> 
>> On May 12, 2011, at 03:35 , Quintus wrote:
> 
>>> Obviously RedCloth generates some warnings during compilation, and now
>>> RubyGems advises the compiler to treat them as errors--as far as I know
>>> this wasn't the case with previous versions of RubyGems, because some
>>> days ago RedCloth installed without problems (no, no new release of
>>> RedCloth happened in the meantime). This causes the installation of
>>> RedCloth to fail.
> 
>> Can we stop with the knee-jerk reaction to blame rubygems for everything including the national deficit?
>> 
>> Rubygems calls make/rake/whatever. That's it.
> 
> Was this really necessary?  Make the output clearer instead of
> complaining that people don’t understand it.

I can't make the output clearer as I didn't make the output to begin with. Again, rubygems just calls make/rake/whatever. That's it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4467

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 01:59, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2011, at 14:21 , Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 23:00, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On May 12, 2011, at 03:35 , Quintus wrote:
>>
>>>> Obviously RedCloth generates some warnings during compilation, and now
>>>> RubyGems advises the compiler to treat them as errors--as far as I know
>>>> this wasn't the case with previous versions of RubyGems, because some
>>>> days ago RedCloth installed without problems (no, no new release of
>>>> RedCloth happened in the meantime). This causes the installation of
>>>> RedCloth to fail.

>>> Can we stop with the knee-jerk reaction to blame rubygems for everything including the national deficit?
>>>
>>> Rubygems calls make/rake/whatever. That's it.

>> Was this really necessary?  Make the output clearer instead of
>> complaining that people don’t understand it.

> I can't make the output clearer as I didn't make the output to begin with

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4487

On May 12, 6:21 pm, Nikolai Weibull <n...@bitwi.se> wrote:
>
> > Rubygems calls make/rake/whatever. That's it.
>
> Was this really necessary?  Make the output clearer instead of
> complaining that people don’t understand it.

The problem is not RubyGems actually, but that RedCloth turns -Werror
so warnings are treated as errors and 'make' interpret GCC exit code
as error, not success.

If you see the output of the gcc part:

ragel/redcloth_inline.c.rl:99:9: error: variable ‘attr_regs’ set but
not
used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make: *** [redcloth_inline.o] Error 1

That is not RubyGems, that is gcc output of make running. Has nothing
to do with make the output cleaner.

RubyGems takes the error of Make and tells you "there was an error
with compilation of extension". RubyGems can't guess or determine what
failed to provide a better error for you, that will be overly
complicated.

As OP said, there must be a change in GCC version or even Ruby version
that could have been the root of this issue.

--
Luis Lavena

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4492

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 15:50, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 12, 6:21 pm, Nikolai Weibull <n...@bitwi.se> wrote:

Ryan Davis wrote:

>> > Rubygems calls make/rake/whatever. That's it.

>> Was this really necessary?  Make the output clearer instead of
>> complaining that people don’t understand it.

> The problem is not RubyGems actually, but that RedCloth turns -Werror
> so warnings are treated as errors and 'make' interpret GCC exit code
> as error, not success.

Yes, I know.  That’s why I wrote

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/383052

As I tried to explain to Ryan in a subsequent email, what I meant was
that I didn’t think it necessary to complain about Quintus’s question
in such a harsh way, especially /after/ I had already provided an
answer.

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/383187

I agree that RubyGems gets some unwarranted flak, but my point was
that users obviously have a hard time discerning what’s at fault when
an error occurs when installing a gem.  By improving the output of
RubyGems when an error occurs, using information provided with the
gem, such as home page, author, and email address, users will know who
to contact to report said error.

> RubyGems takes the error of Make and tells you "there was an error
> with compilation of extension". RubyGems can't guess or determine what
> failed to provide a better error for you, that will be overly
> complicated.

> As OP said, there must be a change in GCC version or even Ruby version
> that could have been the root of this issue.

No, I said that.

I don’t understand why I am constantly being misunderstood, but it
seems that I am at fault.  Perhaps I should make my output clearer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#4498

On May 13, 11:25 am, Nikolai Weibull <n...@bitwi.se> wrote:
>
> I agree that RubyGems gets some unwarranted flak, but my point was
> that users obviously have a hard time discerning what’s at fault when
> an error occurs when installing a gem.  By improving the output of
> RubyGems when an error occurs, using information provided with the
> gem, such as home page, author, and email address, users will know who
> to contact to report said error.
>

Can you open a feature request for that?

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=578&group_id=126&func=browse

Even better if a fork/pull request is done at GitHub:

http://github.com/rubygems/rubygems

I think is not that hard to implement and for sure can serve better to
the user.

> > RubyGems takes the error of Make and tells you "there was an error
> > with compilation of extension". RubyGems can't guess or determine what
> > failed to provide a better error for you, that will be overly
> > complicated.
> > As OP said, there must be a change in GCC version or even Ruby version
> > that could have been the root of this issue.
>
> No, I said that.
>
> I don’t understand why I am constantly being misunderstood, but it
> seems that I am at fault.  Perhaps I should make my output clearer.

Well, some of your answers do not show up in my ruby-talk copy of this
thread, so seems is not your fault been misunderstood.

--
Luis Lavena

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.ruby

csiph-web