Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #7392
| From | Fernando Basso <fernanodobasso.br@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | reduce, map, :+ and :upcase as blocks and symbols as arguments |
| Date | 2018-06-28 06:25 -0300 |
| Organization | Netfront http://www.netfront.net/ |
| Message-ID | <ph29i8$1alc$1@adenine.netfront.net> (permalink) |
Why does `reduce' work passing both `&:+' _and_ `:+', but `map' seems to accept only `&:upcase' (but not `:upcase`)? >> (1..5).reduce(:+) => 15 >> (1..5).reduce(&:+) => 15 >> ['x', 'y', 'z'].map(:upcase) ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 1, expected 0) from (pry):3:in `map' >> ['x', 'y', 'z'].map(&:upcase) => ["X", "Y", "Z"] Docs for `Enumerable#reduce' say: "" Combines all elements of enum by applying a binary operation, specified by a block or a symbol that names a method or operator. "" Docs `Enumerable#map' say: "" Returns a new array with the results of running block once for every element in enum. "" So, is that `reduce' takes both a block and a symbol, while map takes only a block? And if so, is that some Ruby inconsistency?
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
reduce, map, :+ and :upcase as blocks and symbols as arguments Fernando Basso <fernanodobasso.br@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 06:25 -0300
Re: reduce, map, :+ and :upcase as blocks and symbols as arguments Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2018-07-05 08:23 +0200
Re: reduce, map, :+ and :upcase as blocks and symbols as arguments Fernando Basso <fernanodobasso.br@gmail.com> - 2018-07-05 07:01 -0300
csiph-web