Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #7371
| From | neverland@GOODEVEca.net (Pete) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: how many diffrent between ruby 1.8 vs 2.3? |
| Date | 2017-09-09 19:34 +0000 |
| Organization | Very little... |
| Message-ID | <op1fp1$1glo$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <c5476fda-3f7b-4207-ba03-b70f452b5774@googlegroups.com> <1f82c7e4-8f25-45ea-858f-da97684ebf58@googlegroups.com> |
[Sorry, this is a somewhat aging thread, but I just read it now...] In article <1f82c7e4-8f25-45ea-858f-da97684ebf58@googlegroups.com>, Jesús Burgos <jburmac@gmail.com> wrote: >* This is a valid method definition in 1.9 but not in 1.8: > >``` >def method argument > # stuff >end >``` Eh...? I have Ruby 1.8.4 on one of my older machines, and I copy/pasted the above into it. It compiles fine -- and can be invoked: e.g. "method 11" (returning a nil result). Am I missing your meaning? Re the original query, I still find my 'Pickaxe' book for 1.8 an invaluable reference, even for Ruby 2.2. It's the new [absurd (:-/)] behaviour of strings that I have to keep diving to the web to sort out. -- Pete --
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
how many diffrent between ruby 1.8 vs 2.3? pug breaker <pug1270@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 18:51 -0700
Re: how many diffrent between ruby 1.8 vs 2.3? Jesús Burgos <jburmac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 01:26 -0700
Re: how many diffrent between ruby 1.8 vs 2.3? neverland@GOODEVEca.net (Pete) - 2017-09-09 19:34 +0000
Re: how many diffrent between ruby 1.8 vs 2.3? soyeomul@doraji.xyz (Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃炳熙)) - 2017-10-08 21:47 +0900
csiph-web