Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #7305
| Path | csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: Nicest equivalent to counted "for" loop? |
| Date | Fri, 2 Dec 2016 20:56:23 +0100 |
| Lines | 30 |
| Message-ID | <eae1v9F107iU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <36c7832c-aad6-4003-ae76-c392fbe591b7@googlegroups.com> <0df9807f-d5f3-4a27-bd98-d53eea83832f@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net QgbkXhmXXxaXaxqtj+v6MgKXgXbWRJDAdh+4igGklcE8fXBKU= |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:nzfTZ3Yc7blkXIXK1gzy2ZnsGzQ= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <0df9807f-d5f3-4a27-bd98-d53eea83832f@googlegroups.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.ruby:7305 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 01.12.2016 23:01, sbrecher@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 1:58:24 PM UTC-8, brec wrote: >> Currently I've got... >> >> $Count = 192 # some arbitrary constant, or command line argument, or input; > 0 >> >> $i = $Count >> while (i -= 1) >= 0 >> # some stuff >> end >> >> ...In other languages I'd use a counted "for" loop. Is there something more elegant than the above? > > Kindly ignore the missing "$" in the conditional expression. $i.times do |x| end $i.downto 0 do |x| end Off by one errors included. ;-) Cheers robert -- remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Nicest equivalent to counted "for" loop? brec <sbrecher@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:58 -0800
Re: Nicest equivalent to counted "for" loop? sbrecher@gmail.com - 2016-12-01 14:01 -0800
Re: Nicest equivalent to counted "for" loop? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-12-02 20:56 +0100
Re: Nicest equivalent to counted "for" loop? "Robert L." <No_spamming@noWhere_7073.org> - 2017-01-15 14:03 +0000
csiph-web