Re: Setting a 'reference' inside the method body

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!talisker.lacave.net!lacave.net!not-for-mail
From	Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.ruby
Subject	Re: Setting a 'reference' inside the method body
Date	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:28:00 -0500
Organization	Service de news de lacave.net
Lines	49
Message-ID	<c8ea4e436f3d64ee1cc6891975d8e04c@ruby-forum.com> (permalink)
References	<ce11d8adf31eab2c2a5b15b2b4337a74@ruby-forum.com> <BANLkTim+1PkCGMWBqTk30M2QAtE-=wgVAA@mail.gmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host	bristol.highgroove.com
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	talisker.lacave.net 1303831701 25680 65.111.164.187 (26 Apr 2011 15:28:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@lacave.net
NNTP-Posting-Date	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:28:21 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To	<BANLkTim+1PkCGMWBqTk30M2QAtE-=wgVAA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Received-From	This message has been automatically forwarded from the ruby-talk mailing list by a gateway at comp.lang.ruby. If it is SPAM, it did not originate at comp.lang.ruby. Please report the original sender, and not us. Thanks! For more details about this gateway, please visit: http://blog.grayproductions.net/categories/the_gateway
X-Mail-Count	382204
X-Ml-Name	ruby-talk
X-Rubymirror	Yes
X-Ruby-Talk	<c8ea4e436f3d64ee1cc6891975d8e04c@ruby-forum.com>
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.ruby:3517

Show key headers only | View raw

Xavier Noria wrote in post #995127:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Peter Szinek <peter.szinek@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> inside foo() we know whether we want to empty the array or not... it
>> would be complicated to return something from foo() with the current
>> architecture (based on which we could empty the hash or not).
>
> You cannot change the reference stored in the caller's baz, because
> Ruby has pass by value semantics. But hashes are mutable, in
> particular
>
>     baz.clear
>
> wipes the hash, so the caller will see it empty as well.

(bar.clear that is). Using bar.replace({}) is another option. Both of 
these mutate the Hash that was passed in.

In Ruby:

- all values are object references
- all method calls are pass-by-value
- a local variable is *not* itself an object
- you cannot take a "reference" to a local variable

Almost certainly you want to mutate the Hash being passed in, not 
attempt to modify the caller's local variable which holds the reference 
to that Hash.

That said, there is one nasty way to achieve specifically what you 
asked:

def bar(b)
  eval "baz='whoopee'", b
end

baz = {:fluff => :ork}
bar(binding)
p baz

It involves either passing a Binding (as shown), or passing a block, 
which also carries a Binding, and then evaluating code in the context of 
that Binding. Unless you're writing a debugger or something like that, 
you almost certainly don't want to do this.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Thread

Setting a 'reference' inside the method body Peter Szinek <peter.szinek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 09:55 -0500
  Re: Setting a 'reference' inside the method body Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> - 2011-04-26 10:04 -0500
    Re: Setting a 'reference' inside the method body Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-26 10:28 -0500
      Re: Setting a 'reference' inside the method body Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com> - 2011-04-27 00:46 -0500
        Re: Setting a 'reference' inside the method body Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> - 2011-04-27 01:04 -0500

csiph-web