Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #6559
| From | Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: what's up with return *splat ? |
| Date | 2012-06-12 23:19 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <a3pq3mFm27U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <0fae13bb-3468-4883-b855-17950bee1117@t2g2000pbl.googlegroups.com> |
On 12.06.2012 20:48, Phlip wrote: > Rubies: > > Back in the Halcyon days (whatever that means) of Ruby 1.8, a function > could obey the contract "return nil, a scalar, or an array" with a > mere splat: > > return * splat > > The interpretation there is (roughly!) "splat behaves as if you had > written each argument in an array as scalars separated by commas." > > So (roughly!), you would get one of these three results: > > return nil > return scalar > return [ scalar1, scalar2, scalar3 ] > > Now that I work in Ruby 1.9, the splat don't work like that. It just > passes through an array. > > Am I using it wrong? Did splat change? If so, why? And can I use some > other 1.9-compliant trick? Can you please show the code you used for testing? Thank you. Kind regards robert -- remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
what's up with return *splat ? Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> - 2012-06-12 11:48 -0700
Re: what's up with return *splat ? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-12 23:19 +0200
Re: what's up with return *splat ? Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> - 2012-06-12 17:10 -0700
Re: what's up with return *splat ? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-16 15:04 +0200
Re: what's up with return *splat ? Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> - 2012-06-21 16:24 -0700
Re: what's up with return *splat ? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-22 18:24 +0200
Re: what's up with return *splat ? Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> - 2012-06-22 10:02 -0700
Re: what's up with return *splat ? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-22 23:36 +0200
Re: what's up with return *splat ? Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> - 2012-06-24 16:27 -0700
csiph-web