Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #4809
| From | Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. |
| Date | Fri, 20 May 2011 07:34:46 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Lines | 15 |
| Message-ID | <BANLkTim6gfUt2C5sX72YNXLkynpHaW0UTQ@mail.gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <iqqupr$i2j$1@dont-email.me> <89280a1ffc0d0e79f6d550c5a42fac25@ruby-forum.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | bristol.highgroove.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-Trace | talisker.lacave.net 1305894906 65033 65.111.164.187 (20 May 2011 12:35:06 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@lacave.net |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 20 May 2011 12:35:06 +0000 (UTC) |
| In-Reply-To | <89280a1ffc0d0e79f6d550c5a42fac25@ruby-forum.com> |
| X-Received-From | This message has been automatically forwarded from the ruby-talk mailing list by a gateway at comp.lang.ruby. If it is SPAM, it did not originate at comp.lang.ruby. Please report the original sender, and not us. Thanks! For more details about this gateway, please visit: http://blog.grayproductions.net/categories/the_gateway |
| X-Mail-Count | 383514 |
| X-Ml-Name | ruby-talk |
| X-Gateway-Modified | [Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.] |
| X-Rubymirror | Yes |
| X-Ruby-Talk | <BANLkTim6gfUt2C5sX72YNXLkynpHaW0UTQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!feed.ac-versailles.fr!talisker.lacave.net!lacave.net!not-for-mail |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.ruby:4809 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.] On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> wrote: > > Otherwise, I guess ruby is not the language for you. For those who need > to write programs using formal methods or safety-critical systems I'd > say it's definitely not. But many of us use it because ruby helps us > write useful applications quickly and enjoyably. > > > Why is not suitable for safety-critical systems?
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. no.top.post@gmail.com - 2011-05-16 10:37 +0000
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Adam Prescott <adam@aprescott.com> - 2011-05-16 06:15 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Peter Hickman <peterhickman386@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-16 06:24 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-16 06:52 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Clifford Heath <no@spam.please.net> - 2011-05-17 09:17 +1000
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> - 2011-05-16 19:50 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-05-17 02:41 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-18 20:35 +0200
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 05:07 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-05-16 18:30 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. William Rutiser <wruyahoo05@comcast.net> - 2011-05-16 19:21 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Justin Collins <justincollins@ucla.edu> - 2011-05-17 04:24 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. "Markus H." <shevegen@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 12:57 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Kevin <darkintent@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 13:42 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-05-20 03:25 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 07:34 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. spiralofhope <spiralofhope_rubyml@lavabit.com> - 2011-05-20 13:24 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Intransition <transfire@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 08:12 -0500
Re: canonical/syntax-diagrams representation. Intransition <transfire@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 08:12 -0500
csiph-web