Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #3246
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!talisker.lacave.net!lacave.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> |
| Date | Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:18:51 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Lines | 22 |
| Message-ID | <9b174c2306ccb671f0cdd13f433067f9@ruby-forum.com> (permalink) |
| References | <BANLkTimdp71nhRkF5GiOxsQ-gtP4wkwE9w@mail.gmail.com> <03b15245deb79f0148cf821c34a7ed41@ruby-forum.com> <ae38c1271ac391d8aad35ef2cc946cda@ruby-forum.com> <BANLkTimUF7wuGnis4endTjSQgW7TOnpJ+w@mail.gmail.com> <F3D54DF8-5D84-4B3F-9EFF-BE6D36319697@carboni.ca> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | bristol.highgroove.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | talisker.lacave.net 1303312880 945 65.111.164.187 (20 Apr 2011 15:21:20 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@lacave.net |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) |
| In-Reply-To | <F3D54DF8-5D84-4B3F-9EFF-BE6D36319697@carboni.ca> |
| X-Received-From | This message has been automatically forwarded from the ruby-talk mailing list by a gateway at comp.lang.ruby. If it is SPAM, it did not originate at comp.lang.ruby. Please report the original sender, and not us. Thanks! For more details about this gateway, please visit: http://blog.grayproductions.net/categories/the_gateway |
| X-Mail-Count | 381927 |
| X-Ml-Name | ruby-talk |
| X-Rubymirror | Yes |
| X-Ruby-Talk | <9b174c2306ccb671f0cdd13f433067f9@ruby-forum.com> |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.ruby:3246 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Michael Edgar wrote in post #993817: > Proc > doesn't implement #initialize, so it bubbles up to Object#initialize. > Since Object#initialize just takes any number of arguments and ignores > them, providing an argument to Proc.new doesn't raise. So I think the question becomes: why does Object#initialize accept any number of arguments in 1.9? It doesn't in 1.8. $ ruby -ve 'Object.new(1,2,3)' ruby 1.8.7 (2010-06-23 patchlevel 299) [x86_64-linux] -e:1:in `initialize': wrong number of arguments (3 for 0) (ArgumentError) from -e:1:in `new' from -e:1 $ ruby192 -ve 'Object.new(1,2,3)' ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-18 revision 29036) [x86_64-linux] $ -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-04-19 01:07 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-19 02:30 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-19 03:05 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-19 03:15 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-04-19 04:57 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-19 07:24 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Adam Prescott <adam@aprescott.com> - 2011-04-19 14:55 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-04-19 16:43 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-19 18:48 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-19 21:28 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-04-20 01:03 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-20 02:23 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com> - 2011-04-20 05:55 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-20 12:32 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com> - 2011-04-20 12:59 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-20 15:40 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-20 19:51 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-04-21 01:31 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-21 04:34 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-21 06:13 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-21 09:20 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-21 11:56 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com> - 2011-04-21 12:06 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-27 06:49 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-04-27 13:33 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com> - 2011-04-27 17:06 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-19 13:02 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-19 13:19 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com> - 2011-04-19 13:26 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Michael Edgar <adgar@carboni.ca> - 2011-04-19 13:51 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-20 10:18 -0500
Re: anonymous closures with Proc,new, lambda and -> Jeremy Bopp <jeremy@bopp.net> - 2011-04-20 12:44 -0500
csiph-web