Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #7404
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-25 08:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <841d1cc3-7a6f-49e9-a115-feef6c3620d7@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | question regarding the order of development- pry, pry-byebug, byebug |
| From | Robert Phillips <robert.phillips37@gmail.com> |
I can see that pry was made then pry-byebug, then byebug pry initial commit is dec 2010 https://github.com/pry/pry/commits/master?after=f87764d8c2d532e6e5c78c9e0a7f1c7716187ae9+3884 pry-byebug initial commit is june 2012 https://github.com/deivid-rodriguez/pry-byebug/commits/master?before=283357cb5837022096373851950a69b37f0a4f8a+455 byebug initial commit is march 2013 https://github.com/deivid-rodriguez/byebug/commits/master?after=af25ece0b5a43fd857d19a45206653d0c402cd10+2659 I can guess that pry-byebug is meant to be an improvement of pry's debugging. Is byebug meant to be an improvement on pry-byebug ? If not, why was it developed after? Thanks
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next | Find similar
question regarding the order of development- pry, pry-byebug, byebug Robert Phillips <robert.phillips37@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 08:09 -0800
csiph-web