Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #5004
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!talisker.lacave.net!lacave.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Mike Stephens <rubfor@recitel.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: Object-Oriented thinking |
| Date | Tue, 24 May 2011 12:52:24 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Lines | 15 |
| Message-ID | <7e88a5aca3b722a515b09000f840d958@ruby-forum.com> (permalink) |
| References | <BANLkTikscf+gkAPgfBh4h30RZ55tj_vSVw@mail.gmail.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | bristol.highgroove.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | talisker.lacave.net 1306259563 79302 65.111.164.187 (24 May 2011 17:52:43 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@lacave.net |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 24 May 2011 17:52:43 +0000 (UTC) |
| In-Reply-To | <BANLkTikscf+gkAPgfBh4h30RZ55tj_vSVw@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Received-From | This message has been automatically forwarded from the ruby-talk mailing list by a gateway at comp.lang.ruby. If it is SPAM, it did not originate at comp.lang.ruby. Please report the original sender, and not us. Thanks! For more details about this gateway, please visit: http://blog.grayproductions.net/categories/the_gateway |
| X-Mail-Count | 383710 |
| X-Ml-Name | ruby-talk |
| X-Rubymirror | Yes |
| X-Ruby-Talk | <7e88a5aca3b722a515b09000f840d958@ruby-forum.com> |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.ruby:5004 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Michael Sokol wrote in post #999929: > the boundary between the two ways of thinking (procedural > vs OOP) seem very thin, I know it's not what you asked, but it's easy to forget that computers can't run object-oriented (or functional) code. They can only run procedural. Your objects are always disguising procedures and your functions are always on top of procedural code. If you lift the bonnet (hood) don't be surprised to see it, or worry about dabbling a bit. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Object-Oriented thinking Michael Sokol <mikaa123@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 12:58 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Mike Moore <blowmage@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 14:10 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-05-20 19:17 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-23 02:23 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Mike Stephens <rubfor@recitel.net> - 2011-05-24 12:52 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Christopher Dicely <cmdicely@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 02:32 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com> - 2011-05-24 22:12 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Mark T <paradisaeidae@gmail.com> - 2011-05-25 01:10 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Michael Sokol <mikaa123@gmail.com> - 2011-05-25 12:43 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Mark T <paradisaeidae@gmail.com> - 2011-05-25 22:06 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com> - 2011-05-25 13:36 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Jörg W Mittag <JoergWMittag+Ruby@GoogleMail.Com> - 2011-06-07 14:32 +0200
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-06-07 16:12 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Mike Moore <blowmage@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 16:22 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-06-07 16:40 -0500
Re: Object-Oriented thinking Eleanor McHugh <eleanor@games-with-brains.com> - 2011-06-19 08:30 -0500
csiph-web