Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #4661
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.cgarbs.de!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!talisker.lacave.net!lacave.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ralf Mueller <ralf.mueller@zmaw.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: Ruby Future Or? |
| Date | Tue, 17 May 2011 03:06:20 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Lines | 21 |
| Message-ID | <4DD22C76.2010501@zmaw.de> (permalink) |
| References | <6d05b0fcba29bff5bd6d7cc4fb9c0187@ruby-forum.com> <BANLkTimMnDC4q63qydS6--20w12UCwTKvg@mail.gmail.com> <7fa70e02-65ff-43f0-8bd3-2e85f332ef0d@r33g2000prh.googlegroups.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | bristol.highgroove.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | talisker.lacave.net 1305619602 52115 65.111.164.187 (17 May 2011 08:06:42 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@lacave.net |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 17 May 2011 08:06:42 +0000 (UTC) |
| In-Reply-To | <7fa70e02-65ff-43f0-8bd3-2e85f332ef0d@r33g2000prh.googlegroups.com> |
| X-Received-From | This message has been automatically forwarded from the ruby-talk mailing list by a gateway at comp.lang.ruby. If it is SPAM, it did not originate at comp.lang.ruby. Please report the original sender, and not us. Thanks! For more details about this gateway, please visit: http://blog.grayproductions.net/categories/the_gateway |
| X-Mail-Count | 383376 |
| X-Ml-Name | ruby-talk |
| X-Rubymirror | Yes |
| X-Ruby-Talk | <4DD22C76.2010501@zmaw.de> |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.ruby:4661 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 05/16/2011 11:20 PM, Daniel Berger wrote: > > On May 15, 1:25 pm, Stu<s...@rubyprogrammer.net> wrote: >> Python and Ruby are pretty much in the same boat. Python won't be the >> Ruby killer. > My prediction? Javascript eventually kills the other dynamic languages > in the web development arena. Why use two languages when you can use > one? Sorry, but this argument just does NOT count (for me). It's leads to the question: Why develop something new? The is no language, which can to everything to the utmost satisfaction of every programmer. This will NOT happen. In contrast every language has areas, where is works fine and others which are tricky to handle with. Even if you stick to web-development (which is itself a large area), JS is not ... let's say that well suited from a programmers point of view. I'd love to see a beautifully designed language like Ruby doing client side web-programming. The other thing is taste: I personally don't like the idea of giving space such a meaning in a programming language. That's one of the reasons, I dislike about Python. Or in other words: Did we really need a dynamic language after PERL? The answer is YES, isn't it? cheers ralf
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ruby Future Or? Robert Johns <piratej74@live.com> - 2011-05-15 06:31 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? John Feminella <johnf@bitsbuilder.com> - 2011-05-15 06:46 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-15 14:00 +0200
Re: Ruby Future Or? Clifford Heath <no@spam.please.net> - 2011-05-15 22:57 +1000
Re: Ruby Future Or? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-15 15:37 +0200
Re: Ruby Future Or? Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@gmail.com> - 2011-05-15 11:08 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-05-15 14:25 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 16:20 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? spiralofhope <spiralofhope_rubyml@lavabit.com> - 2011-05-16 16:49 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Thiel Chang <schang@wxs.nl> - 2011-05-16 17:17 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 19:54 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Stu <stu@rubyprogrammer.net> - 2011-05-16 16:58 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Ralf Mueller <ralf.mueller@zmaw.de> - 2011-05-17 03:06 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Rimantas Liubertas <rimantas@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 05:09 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Vassilis Rizopoulos <eldestdamphyr@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 02:40 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? spiralofhope <spiralofhope_rubyml@lavabit.com> - 2011-05-16 03:30 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Kirk Haines <wyhaines@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 15:31 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Kirk Haines <wyhaines@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 07:28 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Zach Dennis <zach.dennis@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 17:10 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Ivan Cenov <i_cenov@botevgrad.com> - 2011-05-18 04:53 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-17 18:49 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Sam Duncan <sduncan@wetafx.co.nz> - 2011-05-17 19:04 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-17 19:49 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com> - 2011-05-17 21:05 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? David Jacobs <developer@wit.io> - 2011-05-17 22:34 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Christopher Dicely <cmdicely@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 01:21 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? Alexey Petrushin <axyd80@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 18:21 -0500
Re: Ruby Future Or? "Markus H." <shevegen@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 12:51 -0500
csiph-web