Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #2530
| From | Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? |
| Date | 2011-04-08 08:20 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Message-ID | <20110408142041.1bad84cd@fractal> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <20110407163617.GA14421@guilt.hydra> <f2bd41732314686b9da54fedf61e213a@mail.whitequark.org> <20110408014855.GC15718@guilt.hydra> <99220FC9-DD3C-43A7-B219-D8F320FBE7F8@coretech.net.au> <BANLkTik4HHa=yFM2T75YEjYm8wsh=d7eQQ@mail.gmail.com> |
> That is incredibly cool! But can you really implement *any* language? > What about languages that are completely different from javascript? > In Haskell, for example, everything happens lazily, data is > immutable, there is a complex type system. Can you really map this > right to javascript? (or am I misunderstanding OMeta?) My take here is full of handwaving. I'll admit I've never of O-Meta before. Comp sci point of view: OMeta is turing complete? If so then by universality it is possible. Further, OMeta can run C#, it doesn't take a huge stretch of the imagine to say it can run C. Haskell can compile to C*. Therefore it can run Haskell. The best way to do it though would be to port the STG-Machine** into O-meta. Fun! * Check the list of GHC features http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ ** See "Implementing lazy functional languages on stock hardware: the Spineless Tagless G-machine", Simon Peyton Jones 1992. The link on SPJ's website is dead unforunately :( I've been tempted to port STG into ruby before. Or maybe just G-Machine because it's simpler. It just sounds like a fun little project. Sorry for yet another random long interjection on functional programming. SIGH.
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Sniper Abandon <sathish.salem.1984@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 01:44 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Dhruva Sagar <dhruva.sagar@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 01:52 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz> - 2011-04-07 08:00 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Sniper Abandon <sathish.salem.1984@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 02:33 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Dhruva Sagar <dhruva.sagar@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 03:17 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Mike Stephens <rubfor@recitel.net> - 2011-04-07 07:28 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Peter Zotov <whitequark@whitequark.org> - 2011-04-07 07:50 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Peter Zotov <whitequark@whitequark.org> - 2011-04-07 15:37 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Julian Leviston <julian@coretech.net.au> - 2011-04-07 23:46 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-08 08:03 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> - 2011-04-08 08:20 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> - 2011-04-08 08:34 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz> - 2011-04-11 04:45 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-11 05:34 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz> - 2011-04-11 07:59 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? William Rutiser <wruyahoo05@comcast.net> - 2011-04-11 09:48 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> - 2011-04-11 11:53 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> - 2011-04-11 11:57 -0500
"of" keyword? inverse dot syntax... Julian Leviston <julian@coretech.net.au> - 2011-04-08 03:34 -0500
Re: "of" keyword? inverse dot syntax... Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-08 07:52 -0500
Re: "of" keyword? inverse dot syntax... Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> - 2011-04-08 14:02 -0500
Re: "of" keyword? inverse dot syntax... Vincent Manis <vmanis@telus.net> - 2011-04-08 20:42 -0500
Re: "of" keyword? inverse dot syntax... Yossef Mendelssohn <ymendel@pobox.com> - 2011-04-09 18:13 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Peter Zotov <whitequark@whitequark.org> - 2011-04-08 04:47 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Alexey Petrushin <axyd80@gmail.com> - 2011-04-09 22:58 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-11 08:17 -0500
Re: can we use direct ruby instaed of javascript ? Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-11 09:07 -0500
csiph-web