Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #3332
| From | Andrew Berkeley <andrew.berkeley.is@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | class_eval doesn't find const_missing |
| Date | 2011-04-21 14:20 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Message-ID | <094bd73f3389eb03672e8bb25c9b8ec6@ruby-forum.com> (permalink) |
I am trying to write a DSL which uses method_missing and const_missing
to catch upper and lowercase names (specified in isolation) and fetch
the asscoated (already initialized) objects. This works great until I
need to use class_eval which seemingly doesn't follow the custom
const_missing method.
Here's a more simple example of a class with a constant and
#method_missing and #const_missing methods.
class DummyClass
NAME = 'dummy constant'
def self.method_missing(method,*args,&block)
return "this #{method} was captured by #method_missing"
end
def self.const_missing(constant)
return "this #{constant} was captured by #const_missing"
end
end
Accessing the constant is no problem
> DummyClass::NAME
=> "dummy constant"
Unknown methods and constants are handled as expected
> DummyClass::ANOTHER_CONSTANT
=> "this ANOTHER_CONSTANT was captured by #const_missing"
> DummyClass.some_method
=> "this some_method was captured by #method_missing"
Accessing the constant via class_eval is variable - it works when
evaluating strings but not blocks.
> DummyClass.class_eval "NAME"
=> "dummy constant"
> DummyClass.class_eval {NAME}
NameError: uninitialized constant NAME
from (irb):14
from (irb):14:in `class_eval'
from (irb):14
from :0
This is partly understood since blocks are scoped to the context in
which they were created. But even if the explicit constant is not
recognised, why isn't the class #const_missing method invoked?
Does the class_eval method allow the method_missing method to be used?
> DummyClass.class_eval "dummy_method"
=> "this dummy_method was captured by #method_missing"
> DummyClass.class_eval {dummy_method}
=> "this dummy_method was captured by #method_missing"
Yes. #method_missing works as expected, in both string and block
formats. So only #const_missing is causing a problem.
Interestingly, an explicit call to #const_missing inside a class_eval
block DOES work.
> DummyClass.class_eval {const_missing :ANOTHER_CONSTANT}
=> "this ANOTHER_CONSTANT was captured by #const_missing"
Anybody understand this, and is there a way to get around it?
Cheers
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
class_eval doesn't find const_missing Andrew Berkeley <andrew.berkeley.is@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-21 14:20 -0500
Re: class_eval doesn't find const_missing Stephen Prater <stephenp@agrussell.com> - 2011-04-21 16:34 -0500
Re: class_eval doesn't find const_missing 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-21 18:14 -0500
Re: class_eval doesn't find const_missing 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-21 17:38 -0500
Re: class_eval doesn't find const_missing 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-21 18:29 -0500
Re: class_eval doesn't find const_missing Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-21 16:26 -0500
Re: class_eval doesn't find const_missing Andrew Berkeley <andrew.berkeley.is@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-22 14:43 -0500
csiph-web