Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #4296 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-04-28 22:23 -0600 |
| Last post | 2011-04-28 22:23 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Composition instead of inheritance Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-04-28 22:23 -0600
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-28 22:23 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Composition instead of inheritance |
| Message-ID | <mailman.983.1304051025.9059.python-list@python.org> |
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > For anybody interested in composition instead of multiple inheritance, I > have posted this recipe on ActiveState (for python 2.6/7, not 3.x): > > http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577658-composition-of-classes-instead-of-multiple-inherit/ > > Comments welcome! On line 14, is it intentional that attributes whose values happen to be false are not considered as conflicts? On line 31, this code: thing = getattr(thing, '__func__', None) or thing could be simplified to this: thing = getattr(thing, '__func__', thing) Cheers, Ian
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web