Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #13108 > unrolled thread
| Started by | 蓝色基因 <bluegene8210@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-09-10 20:54 -0700 |
| Last post | 2011-09-11 08:46 -0700 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
Deadlock problem using multiprocessing 蓝色基因 <bluegene8210@gmail.com> - 2011-09-10 20:54 -0700
Re: Deadlock problem using multiprocessing Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com> - 2011-09-11 17:02 +0530
Re: Deadlock problem using multiprocessing Jacky Liu <bluegene8210@gmail.com> - 2011-09-11 08:46 -0700
| From | 蓝色基因 <bluegene8210@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-10 20:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Deadlock problem using multiprocessing |
| Message-ID | <5ccb9d98-f3f8-4f86-b53c-cda4522b40fc@14g2000prv.googlegroups.com> |
This is my first touch on the multiprocessing module, and I admit not having a deep understanding of parallel programming, forgive me if there's any obvious error. This is my test code: # deadlock.py import multiprocessing class MPTask: def __init__(self): self._tseq= range(10) # task sequence self._pool= multiprocessing.Pool(2) # process pool def _exe(self, num): return num**2 def run(self): result= self._pool.map_async(self._exe, self._tseq) return result.get() result= MPTask().run() print(result) And seemingly it creates a deadlock, I have to manually kill the processes in the system monitor, yet it would be OK if the _exe() function was defined outside the MPTask class: # no_deadlock.py import multiprocessing def _exe(num): return num**2 class MPTask: def __init__(self): self._tseq= range(10) # task sequence self._pool= multiprocessing.Pool(2) # process pool def run(self): result= self._pool.map_async(_exe, self._tseq) return result.get() result= MPTask().run() print(result) This would give the correct answer without any deadlock. My questions: 1. Why is this, where did the deadlock come from? 2. Besides, is there any material I can refer to about how to avoid deadlocks when using multiple processes in the program? Thanks!
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-11 17:02 +0530 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.981.1315740760.27778.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #13108 |
2011/9/11 蓝色基因 <bluegene8210@gmail.com>:
> This is my first touch on the multiprocessing module, and I admit not
> having a deep understanding of parallel programming, forgive me if
> there's any obvious error. This is my test code:
>
> # deadlock.py
>
> import multiprocessing
>
> class MPTask:
> def __init__(self):
> self._tseq= range(10) # task sequence
> self._pool= multiprocessing.Pool(2) # process pool
> def _exe(self, num):
> return num**2
> def run(self):
> result= self._pool.map_async(self._exe, self._tseq)
> return result.get()
>
> result= MPTask().run()
> print(result)
>
> And seemingly it creates a deadlock, I have to manually kill the
> processes in the system monitor, yet it would be OK if the _exe()
> function was defined outside the MPTask class:
>
> # no_deadlock.py
> import multiprocessing
>
> def _exe(num):
> return num**2
>
> class MPTask:
> def __init__(self):
> self._tseq= range(10) # task sequence
> self._pool= multiprocessing.Pool(2) # process pool
> def run(self):
> result= self._pool.map_async(_exe, self._tseq)
> return result.get()
>
> result= MPTask().run()
> print(result)
>
> This would give the correct answer without any deadlock. My questions:
>
> 1. Why is this, where did the deadlock come from?
>
> 2. Besides, is there any material I can refer to about how to avoid
> deadlocks when using multiple processes in the program?
>
I get this exception when I run the first program:
Exception in thread Thread-1:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.1/threading.py", line 516, in _bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File "/usr/lib/python3.1/threading.py", line 469, in run
self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python3.1/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 231, in _handle_tasks
put(task)
File "/usr/lib/python3.1/pickle.py", line 1349, in dumps
Pickler(f, protocol, fix_imports=fix_imports).dump(obj)
_pickle.PicklingError: Can't pickle <class 'method'>: attribute lookup
builtins.method failed
There is no deadlock. You are hitting this problem:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1816958/cant-pickle-type-instancemethod-when-using-pythons-multiprocessing-pool-map
--
regards,
kushal
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jacky Liu <bluegene8210@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-11 08:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b40429ce-3632-4540-aa29-79b99c41aa27@a10g2000prn.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #13121 |
> > I get this exception when I run the first program: > > Exception in thread Thread-1: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python3.1/threading.py", line 516, in _bootstrap_inner > self.run() > File "/usr/lib/python3.1/threading.py", line 469, in run > self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs) > File "/usr/lib/python3.1/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 231, in _handle_tasks > put(task) > File "/usr/lib/python3.1/pickle.py", line 1349, in dumps > Pickler(f, protocol, fix_imports=fix_imports).dump(obj) > _pickle.PicklingError: Can't pickle <class 'method'>: attribute lookup > builtins.method failed > > There is no deadlock. You are hitting this problem:http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1816958/cant-pickle-type-instancem... > > -- > regards, > kushal You're right. I just realized that I was running the program through my Vim plug-in which would use the subprocess module to open the process, wait for its termination and get the output. It seems that multi-process program would act quite differently such that my Vim plug-in had been halted without getting any error information, so I was to falsely take it as a deadlock. The thread in stackoverflow you referenced is great, now I'm trying to fit the solution in my own program, thanks a lot!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web