Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #70406 > unrolled thread

Re: Why Python 3?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Why Python 3? Ian Foote <ian@feete.org> - 2014-04-20 09:47 +0100

#70406 — Re: Why Python 3?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 20/04/14 03:34, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 04/18/2014 10:49 PM, Andrew Berg wrote:
>> Python 3 is not the future; it is the present. If you're
>> developing an application, just use Python 3.4 and don't look
>> back unless you absolutely positively *need* one of the big
>> libraries that doesn't fully support Python 3 yet.
> 
> Depends on what OS you want to be running on.  I don't know of any 
> currently-supported Enterprise distributions (long-term support)
> that ship with Python 3.4.

I don't know if you'd count it as an "Enterprise" distribution, but
ubuntu 14.04 (LTS) ships with python 3.4 (and 2.7).

Regards,
Ian F
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTU4mGAAoJEODsV4MF7PWzR2sIAL4P0DhzWr5b7T4tfxSFWvlM
A31VEwh1MiL8qQKi+ukzm1lumnqF0VZG5a8VYOrq9F/AgbPmkmdaJ3vwlNSZYYrq
X6E0zdszTbnK6ec3zNHsqhWd7id/vzyJG5OQkDgg7K9dHY2r2lYfneIUhKvGy01q
6kaqWWXs77UIeWam2amjhtAMsUZtte/828CoIugHBdZgUhmbbNA8PK6/38w6BSgw
3NzT2kCz0298jqPUUZw++pap0Bb/9tQ+Ceps6KKeCE3QJ12Qn7Viv7TnrpQQnkeT
Wt56VWoS9VGodB8h7ozHFGeA11VePN9YdLeM+CuUqNsOxXhuean7ysMiazMU30s=
=mv5B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web