Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #94443 > unrolled thread

Re: problem with selecting remote procedure calls

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: problem with selecting remote procedure calls Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2015-07-23 12:39 +0100
    Re: problem with selecting remote procedure calls Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2015-07-23 20:57 +0200

#94443 — Re: problem with selecting remote procedure calls

On 23/07/2015 04:10, eric johansson wrote:
> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1M-TzfRaSaAhFXQk1OmcmHNOaW31_7W_7q0bf8CAJqSw/edit?usp=sharing
>
>  while this is related to my speech recognition through the next
> project, is actually a good question for RPCs in general.
> Specifically, are there any good-RPCs out there that are fast,
> supported, and easy to use?

It looks like a decent fit for Pyro:

  https://github.com/irmen/Pyro4

  http://pythonhosted.org/Pyro4/

  https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Pyro4

Pyro's certainly actively maintained and I've seen its developer, Irmen
de Jong, pop up on this list fairly recently.

Exactly how good a fit it is would depend on your precise setup. But I
think it's worth exploring. I can't speak as to its speed -- I've only
used it where speed wasn't really an issue.

TJG

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#94462

On 23-7-2015 13:39, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 23/07/2015 04:10, eric johansson wrote:
>> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1M-TzfRaSaAhFXQk1OmcmHNOaW31_7W_7q0bf8CAJqSw/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>>  while this is related to my speech recognition through the next
>> project, is actually a good question for RPCs in general.
>> Specifically, are there any good-RPCs out there that are fast,
>> supported, and easy to use?
> 
> It looks like a decent fit for Pyro:
> 
>   https://github.com/irmen/Pyro4
>   http://pythonhosted.org/Pyro4/
>   https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Pyro4
> 
> Pyro's certainly actively maintained and I've seen its developer, Irmen
> de Jong, pop up on this list fairly recently.

Hi!


> Exactly how good a fit it is would depend on your precise setup. But I
> think it's worth exploring. I can't speak as to its speed -- I've only
> used it where speed wasn't really an issue.

Performance depends on many factors. I used to have a table with numbers in the manual
but since replaced it by a more general indication;
http://pythonhosted.org/Pyro4/intro.html#performance

Eric, if you're concerned about performance, Pyro4 (the source distribution) comes with
several examples that do simple performance related tests. You could run these and see
what figures you get on your setup to see if it's anywhere acceptable, before even
building anything with Pyro yourself.

Interesting project btw.
Good luck!

Irmen

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web