Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #51757 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-08-01 15:25 -0400 |
| Last post | 2013-08-01 15:25 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Oddity with 'yield' as expression - parentheses demanded Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-01 15:25 -0400
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-08-01 15:25 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Oddity with 'yield' as expression - parentheses demanded |
| Message-ID | <mailman.91.1375385141.1251.python-list@python.org> |
On 8/1/2013 1:58 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote: >> yield was a statement before it became an expression, and the syntax >> "yield x, y, z" was (and still is) perfectly legal, with all three >> expressions (technically a single tuple expression) being governed by >> the yield. That is to say, "yield x, y, z" and "yield (x, y, z)" are >> semantically equivalent. When it became an expression, in order to >> preserve this equivalence, that meant that the yield expression needed >> to bind even less tightly than the comma. In terms of the grammar, >> yield needed to take an expression_list, not just an expression. >> >> There are only three places in the grammar where expression_lists are >> used without enclosing them in brackets: expression statements (in >> this case analogous to the yield statement), the return statement (not >> normally used to return a value in a generator), and the assignment >> statements. So for consistency and clarity the rules for >> parenthesizing yield statements are basically adopted from the >> existing rules for parenthesizing expression_lists. > > Ahh, right. That makes good sense. > > If this were being created anew now, would yield be made to bind more > tightly than the comma? As a statement (which is the primary use of yield), yield is like return, except that the execution frame is not discarded. So I think it should bind like return, which is very loosely. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web