Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #102745 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-09 19:40 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-02-09 19:40 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string! Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org> - 2016-02-09 19:40 -0600
| From | Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-09 19:40 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string! |
| Message-ID | <mailman.9.1455068428.7749.python-list@python.org> |
On 02/09/2016 07:26 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I am using datetime.now() to create a unique version of a filename. > When the final file is named, it will look something like: > > myfile-2015-02-09-19-08-45-4223 > > Notice I'm replacing all of the "."'s, " "'s, and ":"'s returned by > datetime.now() with "-"'s. I'm doing that using the following code but > it's freaking ugly and I KNOW there is a better way to do it. I just > can't seem to think of it right now. Can anyone help? What is the > "right", or at least, less ugly, way to do this task? Found the solution in strftime(). Exactly what I was looking for.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web